Improving Written Mathematical Arguments

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Improving Written Mathematical Arguments
Language: English
Authors: Pallanck, Jennifer L., Castro, Gabriel O., Colonnese, Madelyn W., Casa, Tutita M.
Source: Mathematics Teacher: Learning and Teaching PK-12. Nov 2020 113(11):910-917.
Availability: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. 1906 Association Drive, Reston, VA 20191. Tel: 800-235-7566; Tel: 703-620-9840; Fax: 703-476-2570; e-mail: publicationsdept@nctm.org; Web site: https://pubs.nctm.org/
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 8
Publication Date: 2020
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Descriptive
Education Level: Elementary Education
Grade 6
Intermediate Grades
Middle Schools
Elementary Secondary Education
Descriptors: Mathematics Instruction, Persuasive Discourse, Common Core State Standards, Best Practices, Teaching Methods, Grade 6, Models, Mathematical Concepts, Concept Formation, Writing (Composition), Elementary Secondary Education
DOI: 10.5951/MTLT.2019.0112
ISSN: 0025-5769
Abstract: Facilitating meaningful discourse directly supports what students should be able to do with respect to the third of the eight Standards for Mathematical Practice (SMP 3) in the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics (NGA Center and CCSSO 2010): "Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others" (p. 6). Following best practices of teaching the features unique to argumentative writing and sharing exemplars, the authors presumed they could build students' capacities to realize what composes a mathematical argument and help them identify ways to improve their individual writing. Specifically, the authors decided to have students address four components when constructing a mathematical argument: (1) the "claim" presenting the position being taken; (2) the "evidence" that supports the claim; (3) the "warrant" explaining how the evidence supports the claim, such as a definition; and (4) the "mechanics," which help to convey ideas that flow. The authors used student- and teacher-made exemplars and discussed and explained "how each text demonstrates characteristics of effective writing in that particular genre" (Graham et al. 2012, p. 22). The authors also created mathematical arguments that excluded key components (i.e., claim, evidence, or warrant) and had students critique them. These samples reflected students' struggles when writing a mathematical argument. Reflecting best literacy practices, the samples were then used to model techniques for improving the mathematical argument so students could imitate this process when revising their own work.
Abstractor: ERIC
Entry Date: 2020
Accession Number: EJ1275177
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1275177
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Improving Written Mathematical Arguments
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Pallanck%2C+Jennifer+L%2E%22">Pallanck, Jennifer L.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Castro%2C+Gabriel+O%2E%22">Castro, Gabriel O.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Colonnese%2C+Madelyn+W%2E%22">Colonnese, Madelyn W.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Casa%2C+Tutita+M%2E%22">Casa, Tutita M.</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Mathematics+Teacher%3A+Learning+and+Teaching+PK-12%22"><i>Mathematics Teacher: Learning and Teaching PK-12</i></searchLink>. Nov 2020 113(11):910-917.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. 1906 Association Drive, Reston, VA 20191. Tel: 800-235-7566; Tel: 703-620-9840; Fax: 703-476-2570; e-mail: publicationsdept@nctm.org; Web site: https://pubs.nctm.org/
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 8
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2020
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Descriptive
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Elementary+Education%22">Elementary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Grade+6%22">Grade 6</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Intermediate+Grades%22">Intermediate Grades</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Middle+Schools%22">Middle Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Elementary+Secondary+Education%22">Elementary Secondary Education</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mathematics+Instruction%22">Mathematics Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Persuasive+Discourse%22">Persuasive Discourse</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Common+Core+State+Standards%22">Common Core State Standards</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Best+Practices%22">Best Practices</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teaching+Methods%22">Teaching Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grade+6%22">Grade 6</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Models%22">Models</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mathematical+Concepts%22">Mathematical Concepts</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Concept+Formation%22">Concept Formation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+%28Composition%29%22">Writing (Composition)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Elementary+Secondary+Education%22">Elementary Secondary Education</searchLink>
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.5951/MTLT.2019.0112
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 0025-5769
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Facilitating meaningful discourse directly supports what students should be able to do with respect to the third of the eight Standards for Mathematical Practice (SMP 3) in the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics (NGA Center and CCSSO 2010): "Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others" (p. 6). Following best practices of teaching the features unique to argumentative writing and sharing exemplars, the authors presumed they could build students' capacities to realize what composes a mathematical argument and help them identify ways to improve their individual writing. Specifically, the authors decided to have students address four components when constructing a mathematical argument: (1) the "claim" presenting the position being taken; (2) the "evidence" that supports the claim; (3) the "warrant" explaining how the evidence supports the claim, such as a definition; and (4) the "mechanics," which help to convey ideas that flow. The authors used student- and teacher-made exemplars and discussed and explained "how each text demonstrates characteristics of effective writing in that particular genre" (Graham et al. 2012, p. 22). The authors also created mathematical arguments that excluded key components (i.e., claim, evidence, or warrant) and had students critique them. These samples reflected students' struggles when writing a mathematical argument. Reflecting best literacy practices, the samples were then used to model techniques for improving the mathematical argument so students could imitate this process when revising their own work.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: ERIC
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2020
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1275177
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1275177
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.5951/MTLT.2019.0112
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 8
        StartPage: 910
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Mathematics Instruction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Persuasive Discourse
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Common Core State Standards
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Best Practices
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Teaching Methods
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Grade 6
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Models
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Mathematical Concepts
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Concept Formation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Writing (Composition)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Elementary Secondary Education
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Improving Written Mathematical Arguments
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Pallanck, Jennifer L.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Castro, Gabriel O.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Colonnese, Madelyn W.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Casa, Tutita M.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 11
              Type: published
              Y: 2020
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 0025-5769
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 113
            – Type: issue
              Value: 11
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Mathematics Teacher: Learning and Teaching PK-12
              Type: main
ResultId 1