Collaborative Writing at Work: Peer Feedback in a Blended Learning Environment

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Collaborative Writing at Work: Peer Feedback in a Blended Learning Environment
Language: English
Authors: López-Pellisa, Teresa (ORCID 0000-0003-3151-447X), Rotger, Neus (ORCID 0000-0002-5298-2267), Rodríguez-Gallego, Fernando (ORCID 0000-0002-6539-0447)
Source: Education and Information Technologies. Jan 2021 26(1):1293-1310.
Availability: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 18
Publication Date: 2021
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Collaborative Writing, Peer Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Blended Learning, Revision (Written Composition), Error Correction, Writing Instruction, Academic Language, Technology Integration, Graduate Students, Reflection
DOI: 10.1007/s10639-020-10312-2
ISSN: 1360-2357
Abstract: This exploratory study aims to analyse the nature of peer feedback during a collaborative writing assignment, and to identify the possible effects of feedback on the revision of a text written by university students in a blended learning environment. Under analysis are two different graduate courses in academic writing, during which, over a period of a semester, the students (n = 85) were divided into 25 work groups to carry out a co-evaluation assignment with the support of a technology platform. The results obtained indicate that, when collaborative writing includes peer feedback, instead of unidirectional corrections from the teacher, the students respond more reflectively and constructively, they discuss the content they are working with, and, as a result, they make significant changes in their own writing.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2021
Accession Number: EJ1280681
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1280681
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Collaborative Writing at Work: Peer Feedback in a Blended Learning Environment
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22López-Pellisa%2C+Teresa%22">López-Pellisa, Teresa</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3151-447X">0000-0003-3151-447X</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rotger%2C+Neus%22">Rotger, Neus</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5298-2267">0000-0002-5298-2267</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rodríguez-Gallego%2C+Fernando%22">Rodríguez-Gallego, Fernando</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6539-0447">0000-0002-6539-0447</externalLink>)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Education+and+Information+Technologies%22"><i>Education and Information Technologies</i></searchLink>. Jan 2021 26(1):1293-1310.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 18
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2021
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Collaborative+Writing%22">Collaborative Writing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Peer+Evaluation%22">Peer Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Feedback+%28Response%29%22">Feedback (Response)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Blended+Learning%22">Blended Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Revision+%28Written+Composition%29%22">Revision (Written Composition)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Error+Correction%22">Error Correction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+Instruction%22">Writing Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Academic+Language%22">Academic Language</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Technology+Integration%22">Technology Integration</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Graduate+Students%22">Graduate Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reflection%22">Reflection</searchLink>
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1007/s10639-020-10312-2
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 1360-2357
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: This exploratory study aims to analyse the nature of peer feedback during a collaborative writing assignment, and to identify the possible effects of feedback on the revision of a text written by university students in a blended learning environment. Under analysis are two different graduate courses in academic writing, during which, over a period of a semester, the students (n = 85) were divided into 25 work groups to carry out a co-evaluation assignment with the support of a technology platform. The results obtained indicate that, when collaborative writing includes peer feedback, instead of unidirectional corrections from the teacher, the students respond more reflectively and constructively, they discuss the content they are working with, and, as a result, they make significant changes in their own writing.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2021
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1280681
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1280681
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s10639-020-10312-2
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 18
        StartPage: 1293
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Collaborative Writing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Peer Evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Feedback (Response)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Blended Learning
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Revision (Written Composition)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Error Correction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Writing Instruction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Academic Language
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Technology Integration
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Graduate Students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Reflection
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Collaborative Writing at Work: Peer Feedback in a Blended Learning Environment
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: López-Pellisa, Teresa
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Rotger, Neus
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Rodríguez-Gallego, Fernando
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 2021
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 1360-2357
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 26
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Education and Information Technologies
              Type: main
ResultId 1