Collaborative Writing at Work: Peer Feedback in a Blended Learning Environment
Saved in:
| Title: | Collaborative Writing at Work: Peer Feedback in a Blended Learning Environment |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | López-Pellisa, Teresa (ORCID |
| Source: | Education and Information Technologies. Jan 2021 26(1):1293-1310. |
| Availability: | Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/ |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 18 |
| Publication Date: | 2021 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Collaborative Writing, Peer Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Blended Learning, Revision (Written Composition), Error Correction, Writing Instruction, Academic Language, Technology Integration, Graduate Students, Reflection |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s10639-020-10312-2 |
| ISSN: | 1360-2357 |
| Abstract: | This exploratory study aims to analyse the nature of peer feedback during a collaborative writing assignment, and to identify the possible effects of feedback on the revision of a text written by university students in a blended learning environment. Under analysis are two different graduate courses in academic writing, during which, over a period of a semester, the students (n = 85) were divided into 25 work groups to carry out a co-evaluation assignment with the support of a technology platform. The results obtained indicate that, when collaborative writing includes peer feedback, instead of unidirectional corrections from the teacher, the students respond more reflectively and constructively, they discuss the content they are working with, and, as a result, they make significant changes in their own writing. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2021 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1280681 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1280681 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Collaborative Writing at Work: Peer Feedback in a Blended Learning Environment – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22López-Pellisa%2C+Teresa%22">López-Pellisa, Teresa</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3151-447X">0000-0003-3151-447X</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rotger%2C+Neus%22">Rotger, Neus</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5298-2267">0000-0002-5298-2267</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rodríguez-Gallego%2C+Fernando%22">Rodríguez-Gallego, Fernando</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6539-0447">0000-0002-6539-0447</externalLink>) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Education+and+Information+Technologies%22"><i>Education and Information Technologies</i></searchLink>. Jan 2021 26(1):1293-1310. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/ – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 18 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2021 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Collaborative+Writing%22">Collaborative Writing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Peer+Evaluation%22">Peer Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Feedback+%28Response%29%22">Feedback (Response)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Blended+Learning%22">Blended Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Revision+%28Written+Composition%29%22">Revision (Written Composition)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Error+Correction%22">Error Correction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+Instruction%22">Writing Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Academic+Language%22">Academic Language</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Technology+Integration%22">Technology Integration</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Graduate+Students%22">Graduate Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reflection%22">Reflection</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1007/s10639-020-10312-2 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 1360-2357 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This exploratory study aims to analyse the nature of peer feedback during a collaborative writing assignment, and to identify the possible effects of feedback on the revision of a text written by university students in a blended learning environment. Under analysis are two different graduate courses in academic writing, during which, over a period of a semester, the students (n = 85) were divided into 25 work groups to carry out a co-evaluation assignment with the support of a technology platform. The results obtained indicate that, when collaborative writing includes peer feedback, instead of unidirectional corrections from the teacher, the students respond more reflectively and constructively, they discuss the content they are working with, and, as a result, they make significant changes in their own writing. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2021 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1280681 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1280681 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1007/s10639-020-10312-2 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 18 StartPage: 1293 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Collaborative Writing Type: general – SubjectFull: Peer Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Feedback (Response) Type: general – SubjectFull: Blended Learning Type: general – SubjectFull: Revision (Written Composition) Type: general – SubjectFull: Error Correction Type: general – SubjectFull: Writing Instruction Type: general – SubjectFull: Academic Language Type: general – SubjectFull: Technology Integration Type: general – SubjectFull: Graduate Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Reflection Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Collaborative Writing at Work: Peer Feedback in a Blended Learning Environment Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: López-Pellisa, Teresa – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Rotger, Neus – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Rodríguez-Gallego, Fernando IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2021 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 1360-2357 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 26 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: Education and Information Technologies Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |