Attitudes to Fair Assessment in the Light of COVID-19
Saved in:
| Title: | Attitudes to Fair Assessment in the Light of COVID-19 |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Shaw, Stuart, Nisbet, Isabel |
| Source: | Research Matters. Spr 2021 (31):6-21. |
| Availability: | University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate (Cambridge Assessment). The Triangle Building, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge, United Kingdom CB2 8EA. Tel: +44-1223-553311; e-mail: info@cambridgeassessment.org.uk; Web site: https://www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/our-research/all-published-resources/research-matters/ |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 16 |
| Publication Date: | 2021 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Descriptive |
| Descriptors: | COVID-19, Pandemics, Student Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Foreign Countries, Grading, Grades (Scholastic), Barriers, Public Opinion, Standards, Test Validity, Test Reliability, Standardized Tests, Educational Opportunities |
| Geographic Terms: | United Kingdom, Ireland |
| ISSN: | 1755-6031 |
| Abstract: | Was the approach proposed for calculating exam grades in summer 2020 fair? Were the grades eventually awarded (after policy changes) fair? What is a fair arrangement for 2021? These questions have been at the heart of debate in the UK in the light of COVID-19. After schools were closed in the spring of 2020 and the decision was made not to proceed with summer exams, it was judged unfair to deny students the grades they needed to progress to the next stage in their lives. The task was to find a fair way to award grades in the absence of exams. The approaches developed in all four parts of the UK--and the Republic of Ireland--were thought by the regulators and Ministers to be the fairest possible, but in the event the grades initially awarded were widely decried as "unfair" and instead all the UK countries switched to awarding Centre Assessed Grades (CAGs). The result was not only significant grade inflation (compared to previous years) but unequal treatment of different subjects and groups of candidates. In this article, we shall briefly recall the conceptual map of "fairness" that we have offered elsewhere and outline received views of assessment fairness before 2020. We shall then discuss five challenges to those received views raised by the COVID-19 experience, particularly in the UK. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2021 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1293947 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1293947 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1293947 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Attitudes to Fair Assessment in the Light of COVID-19 – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Shaw%2C+Stuart%22">Shaw, Stuart</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Nisbet%2C+Isabel%22">Nisbet, Isabel</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Research+Matters%22"><i>Research Matters</i></searchLink>. Spr 2021 (31):6-21. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate (Cambridge Assessment). The Triangle Building, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge, United Kingdom CB2 8EA. Tel: +44-1223-553311; e-mail: info@cambridgeassessment.org.uk; Web site: https://www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/our-research/all-published-resources/research-matters/ – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: N – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 16 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2021 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Descriptive – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22COVID-19%22">COVID-19</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Pandemics%22">Pandemics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Evaluation%22">Student Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+Methods%22">Evaluation Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grading%22">Grading</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grades+%28Scholastic%29%22">Grades (Scholastic)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Barriers%22">Barriers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Public+Opinion%22">Public Opinion</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Standards%22">Standards</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Validity%22">Test Validity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Reliability%22">Test Reliability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Standardized+Tests%22">Standardized Tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Opportunities%22">Educational Opportunities</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+Kingdom%22">United Kingdom</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ireland%22">Ireland</searchLink> – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 1755-6031 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Was the approach proposed for calculating exam grades in summer 2020 fair? Were the grades eventually awarded (after policy changes) fair? What is a fair arrangement for 2021? These questions have been at the heart of debate in the UK in the light of COVID-19. After schools were closed in the spring of 2020 and the decision was made not to proceed with summer exams, it was judged unfair to deny students the grades they needed to progress to the next stage in their lives. The task was to find a fair way to award grades in the absence of exams. The approaches developed in all four parts of the UK--and the Republic of Ireland--were thought by the regulators and Ministers to be the fairest possible, but in the event the grades initially awarded were widely decried as "unfair" and instead all the UK countries switched to awarding Centre Assessed Grades (CAGs). The result was not only significant grade inflation (compared to previous years) but unequal treatment of different subjects and groups of candidates. In this article, we shall briefly recall the conceptual map of "fairness" that we have offered elsewhere and outline received views of assessment fairness before 2020. We shall then discuss five challenges to those received views raised by the COVID-19 experience, particularly in the UK. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2021 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1293947 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1293947 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 16 StartPage: 6 Subjects: – SubjectFull: COVID-19 Type: general – SubjectFull: Pandemics Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Evaluation Methods Type: general – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries Type: general – SubjectFull: Grading Type: general – SubjectFull: Grades (Scholastic) Type: general – SubjectFull: Barriers Type: general – SubjectFull: Public Opinion Type: general – SubjectFull: Standards Type: general – SubjectFull: Test Validity Type: general – SubjectFull: Test Reliability Type: general – SubjectFull: Standardized Tests Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Opportunities Type: general – SubjectFull: United Kingdom Type: general – SubjectFull: Ireland Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Attitudes to Fair Assessment in the Light of COVID-19 Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Shaw, Stuart – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Nisbet, Isabel IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2021 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 1755-6031 Numbering: – Type: issue Value: 31 Titles: – TitleFull: Research Matters Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |