Learners' Beliefs about the Functions of Proof: Building an Argument for Validity

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Learners' Beliefs about the Functions of Proof: Building an Argument for Validity
Language: English
Authors: Shongwe, Benjamin (ORCID 0000-0001-8083-6462)
Source: Educational Studies in Mathematics. Jul 2021 107(3):503-523.
Availability: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 21
Publication Date: 2021
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Tests/Questionnaires
Education Level: Grade 11
High Schools
Secondary Education
Descriptors: Student Attitudes, Beliefs, Mathematical Logic, Likert Scales, Grade 11, High School Students, Foreign Countries, Test Validity
Geographic Terms: South Africa
DOI: 10.1007/s10649-021-10047-y
ISSN: 0013-1954
Abstract: Learners' difficulties with proof have been ascribed to their lack of understanding of functions that proof performs in mathematics, namely, verification, explanation, communication, discovery, and systematization. However, the extant mathematics education literature on validation of instruments designed to measure learners' beliefs about the functions of proof is scant. The purpose of this mixed methods study was to use the "Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing" (as discussed by the American Educational Research Association/American Psychological Association/National Council on Measurement in Education (AERA/APA/NCME), 2014) as a theoretical and methodological platform to support arguments for the validity of the learners' beliefs about the functions of proof (BAFP) instrument. Scale items were generated from de Villiers' model and a review of the literature, panel of experts, and key informants. The resulting instrument, comprising 28 Likert-scale items and 5 open questions that assessed the five functions of proof, was administered to 87 grade 11 learners in one high school in the Pinetown Education District, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. The results put the validity of the scores on the BAFP instrument into question. The study was an exploration of validity arguments based on the evidence from various data sources. Confirmatory factor analysis with a larger sample in a different context needs to be conducted to warrant the use of the BAFP instrument. The key contribution of this study to the field is that it sheds light on the complexities of instrument validation; the scope of the effort may explain why comprehensive validation efforts have not been documented extensively in literature.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2021
Accession Number: EJ1306061
Database: ERIC
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
    Url: https://content.ebscohost.com/cds/retrieve?content=AQICAHj0k_4E0hTGH8RJwT4gCJyBsGNe_WN95AvKlDbXJGqwxwGd4gZehFxwHyjQsHFa33ztAAAA4zCB4AYJKoZIhvcNAQcGoIHSMIHPAgEAMIHJBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHgYJYIZIAWUDBAEuMBEEDLrkrfqyG9yTXvx_QQIBEICBm1dCrDQN7W3uG5PzRqz-AZAGCjIwz67XnQ40zx9uHpixIJW7iVdpLfS8O1uXzgdFdRdXlhUE3-fDUPRqngbRVkjugeb9jvICbuWaK6RwG9iHgukT7SNxW7yPia9TLM8hc8ao5O0RK3cGrAc8F96jf3SrlU4SsxDkHTXTTQlEnl2oGWw6eMluzqYal9992Wfb-dGoD7kC9LZBtO90
Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1306061
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Learners' Beliefs about the Functions of Proof: Building an Argument for Validity
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Shongwe%2C+Benjamin%22">Shongwe, Benjamin</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8083-6462">0000-0001-8083-6462</externalLink>)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Educational+Studies+in+Mathematics%22"><i>Educational Studies in Mathematics</i></searchLink>. Jul 2021 107(3):503-523.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 21
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2021
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research<br />Tests/Questionnaires
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Grade+11%22">Grade 11</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22High+Schools%22">High Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Secondary+Education%22">Secondary Education</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Attitudes%22">Student Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Beliefs%22">Beliefs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mathematical+Logic%22">Mathematical Logic</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Likert+Scales%22">Likert Scales</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grade+11%22">Grade 11</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22High+School+Students%22">High School Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Validity%22">Test Validity</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22South+Africa%22">South Africa</searchLink>
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1007/s10649-021-10047-y
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 0013-1954
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Learners' difficulties with proof have been ascribed to their lack of understanding of functions that proof performs in mathematics, namely, verification, explanation, communication, discovery, and systematization. However, the extant mathematics education literature on validation of instruments designed to measure learners' beliefs about the functions of proof is scant. The purpose of this mixed methods study was to use the "Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing" (as discussed by the American Educational Research Association/American Psychological Association/National Council on Measurement in Education (AERA/APA/NCME), 2014) as a theoretical and methodological platform to support arguments for the validity of the learners' beliefs about the functions of proof (BAFP) instrument. Scale items were generated from de Villiers' model and a review of the literature, panel of experts, and key informants. The resulting instrument, comprising 28 Likert-scale items and 5 open questions that assessed the five functions of proof, was administered to 87 grade 11 learners in one high school in the Pinetown Education District, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. The results put the validity of the scores on the BAFP instrument into question. The study was an exploration of validity arguments based on the evidence from various data sources. Confirmatory factor analysis with a larger sample in a different context needs to be conducted to warrant the use of the BAFP instrument. The key contribution of this study to the field is that it sheds light on the complexities of instrument validation; the scope of the effort may explain why comprehensive validation efforts have not been documented extensively in literature.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2021
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1306061
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1306061
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s10649-021-10047-y
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 21
        StartPage: 503
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Student Attitudes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Beliefs
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Mathematical Logic
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Likert Scales
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Grade 11
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: High School Students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Test Validity
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: South Africa
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Learners' Beliefs about the Functions of Proof: Building an Argument for Validity
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Shongwe, Benjamin
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 07
              Type: published
              Y: 2021
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 0013-1954
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 107
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Educational Studies in Mathematics
              Type: main
ResultId 1