View in EDS

Data Collection and Analysis in Response-to-Intervention: A Survey of School Psychologists

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Data Collection and Analysis in Response-to-Intervention: A Survey of School Psychologists
Language: English
Authors: Silva, Meghan R., Collier-Meek, Melissa A., Codding, Robin S., Kleinert, Whitney L., Feinberg, Adam
Source: Contemporary School Psychology. Dec 2021 25(4):554-571.
Availability: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 18
Publication Date: 2021
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Data Collection, Data Analysis, Response to Intervention, Decision Making, School Psychologists, Best Practices, Training, Progress Monitoring
DOI: 10.1007/s40688-020-00280-2
ISSN: 2159-2020
Abstract: Response-to-intervention (RtI) is a multi-tiered framework designed to prevent academic difficulties by facilitating robust, research-based instruction and providing targeted or individualized short-term interventions for students at-risk per periodic screening and progress monitoring data. The cornerstone of RtI is data-based decision-making to guide system-wide practices as well as ensure appropriate student-level academic supports and accurate decisions. However, a 2010 survey of administrators representing over 1000 districts suggest that most schools do not use data-based decisions and research-based interventions. As such, the extent to which RtI generally and data-driven best practices, specifically, occur in schools is unknown. To that end, we surveyed school psychologists to evaluate the extent to which RtI and data-driven practices are implemented. Further, we asked about related training. Findings suggest that although screening data is collected frequently, academic progress monitoring is not and, overall, using data to make instructional or intervention decisions is not part of regular practice.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2021
Accession Number: EJ1316642
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1316642
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Data Collection and Analysis in Response-to-Intervention: A Survey of School Psychologists
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Silva%2C+Meghan+R%2E%22">Silva, Meghan R.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Collier-Meek%2C+Melissa+A%2E%22">Collier-Meek, Melissa A.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Codding%2C+Robin+S%2E%22">Codding, Robin S.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kleinert%2C+Whitney+L%2E%22">Kleinert, Whitney L.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Feinberg%2C+Adam%22">Feinberg, Adam</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Contemporary+School+Psychology%22"><i>Contemporary School Psychology</i></searchLink>. Dec 2021 25(4):554-571.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 18
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2021
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+Collection%22">Data Collection</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+Analysis%22">Data Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Response+to+Intervention%22">Response to Intervention</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Decision+Making%22">Decision Making</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22School+Psychologists%22">School Psychologists</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Best+Practices%22">Best Practices</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Training%22">Training</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Progress+Monitoring%22">Progress Monitoring</searchLink>
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1007/s40688-020-00280-2
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 2159-2020
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Response-to-intervention (RtI) is a multi-tiered framework designed to prevent academic difficulties by facilitating robust, research-based instruction and providing targeted or individualized short-term interventions for students at-risk per periodic screening and progress monitoring data. The cornerstone of RtI is data-based decision-making to guide system-wide practices as well as ensure appropriate student-level academic supports and accurate decisions. However, a 2010 survey of administrators representing over 1000 districts suggest that most schools do not use data-based decisions and research-based interventions. As such, the extent to which RtI generally and data-driven best practices, specifically, occur in schools is unknown. To that end, we surveyed school psychologists to evaluate the extent to which RtI and data-driven practices are implemented. Further, we asked about related training. Findings suggest that although screening data is collected frequently, academic progress monitoring is not and, overall, using data to make instructional or intervention decisions is not part of regular practice.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2021
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1316642
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1316642
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s40688-020-00280-2
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 18
        StartPage: 554
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Data Collection
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Data Analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Response to Intervention
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Decision Making
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: School Psychologists
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Best Practices
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Training
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Progress Monitoring
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Data Collection and Analysis in Response-to-Intervention: A Survey of School Psychologists
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Silva, Meghan R.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Collier-Meek, Melissa A.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Codding, Robin S.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Kleinert, Whitney L.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Feinberg, Adam
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 12
              Type: published
              Y: 2021
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 2159-2020
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 25
            – Type: issue
              Value: 4
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Contemporary School Psychology
              Type: main
ResultId 1