Make a Note of It: Comparison in Longhand, Keyboard, and Stylus Note-Taking Techniques
Saved in:
| Title: | Make a Note of It: Comparison in Longhand, Keyboard, and Stylus Note-Taking Techniques |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Shell, Madelynn D., Strouth, Maranda, Reynolds, Alexandria M. |
| Source: | Learning Assistance Review. Fall 2021 26(2):1-21. |
| Availability: | National College Learning Center Association. Web site: http://www.nclca.org/tlar |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 21 |
| Publication Date: | 2021 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Notetaking, Lecture Method, Keyboarding (Data Entry), Handwriting, Computer Peripherals, Academic Achievement, Grades (Scholastic), Performance Factors, Recall (Psychology), Student Participation, Undergraduate Students, Introductory Courses, Preferences, Affordances |
| ISSN: | 1087-0059 |
| Abstract: | This study investigated the influence of longhand (paper and pen), keyboard, and stylus note-taking on academic performance in college classes. Students attended mini-lectures and took notes using longhand, keyboard, or stylus. Students took quizzes after each mini-lecture and reported their engagement. Final course grades were recorded. Note-taking did not directly affect recall, but students performed better using their preferred note-taking method. Stylus and longhand note-taking conferred advantages in course grades and were associated with higher perceived recall and engagement. Although there may be advantages to longhand and stylus note-taking, it is important to allow flexibility for student note-taking preferences. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2021 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1317169 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Url: https://content.ebscohost.com/cds/retrieve?content=AQICAHj0k_4E0hTGH8RJwT4gCJyBsGNe_WN95AvKlDbXJGqwxwGLOJCRHe6QwhBF1aQRfP0lAAAA4zCB4AYJKoZIhvcNAQcGoIHSMIHPAgEAMIHJBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHgYJYIZIAWUDBAEuMBEEDI9kU1UFI6toxFOhsgIBEICBm_4dQBgyenlvzlocDMcpebGyl6HhqDOT56HUaJGJp_p7E_EC_d_qwxRQi244Q7UxnrAE9lt9xKCnIz-Llj6otDhljykL_AVcHLykjlif_J10aMpk8Bch6Wwu99V3as6TDNr5eMJgRwTtOKrz_xQuw9xZAiZ8bPZHyrs_hK9V-EvPyB2oCTVR9jJOZVDBy8f4s4Zl-RUQVMcjR27z Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1317169 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1317169 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Make a Note of It: Comparison in Longhand, Keyboard, and Stylus Note-Taking Techniques – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Shell%2C+Madelynn+D%2E%22">Shell, Madelynn D.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Strouth%2C+Maranda%22">Strouth, Maranda</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Reynolds%2C+Alexandria+M%2E%22">Reynolds, Alexandria M.</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Learning+Assistance+Review%22"><i>Learning Assistance Review</i></searchLink>. Fall 2021 26(2):1-21. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: National College Learning Center Association. Web site: http://www.nclca.org/tlar – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 21 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2021 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Notetaking%22">Notetaking</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Lecture+Method%22">Lecture Method</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Keyboarding+%28Data+Entry%29%22">Keyboarding (Data Entry)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Handwriting%22">Handwriting</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+Peripherals%22">Computer Peripherals</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Academic+Achievement%22">Academic Achievement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grades+%28Scholastic%29%22">Grades (Scholastic)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Performance+Factors%22">Performance Factors</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Recall+%28Psychology%29%22">Recall (Psychology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Participation%22">Student Participation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Undergraduate+Students%22">Undergraduate Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Introductory+Courses%22">Introductory Courses</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Preferences%22">Preferences</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Affordances%22">Affordances</searchLink> – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 1087-0059 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This study investigated the influence of longhand (paper and pen), keyboard, and stylus note-taking on academic performance in college classes. Students attended mini-lectures and took notes using longhand, keyboard, or stylus. Students took quizzes after each mini-lecture and reported their engagement. Final course grades were recorded. Note-taking did not directly affect recall, but students performed better using their preferred note-taking method. Stylus and longhand note-taking conferred advantages in course grades and were associated with higher perceived recall and engagement. Although there may be advantages to longhand and stylus note-taking, it is important to allow flexibility for student note-taking preferences. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2021 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1317169 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1317169 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 21 StartPage: 1 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Notetaking Type: general – SubjectFull: Lecture Method Type: general – SubjectFull: Keyboarding (Data Entry) Type: general – SubjectFull: Handwriting Type: general – SubjectFull: Computer Peripherals Type: general – SubjectFull: Academic Achievement Type: general – SubjectFull: Grades (Scholastic) Type: general – SubjectFull: Performance Factors Type: general – SubjectFull: Recall (Psychology) Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Participation Type: general – SubjectFull: Undergraduate Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Introductory Courses Type: general – SubjectFull: Preferences Type: general – SubjectFull: Affordances Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Make a Note of It: Comparison in Longhand, Keyboard, and Stylus Note-Taking Techniques Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Shell, Madelynn D. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Strouth, Maranda – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Reynolds, Alexandria M. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2021 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 1087-0059 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 26 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: Learning Assistance Review Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |