Describing the Development of the Assessment of Biological Reasoning (ABR)

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Describing the Development of the Assessment of Biological Reasoning (ABR)
Authors: Schellinger, Jennifer, Enderle, Patrick J. (ORCID 0000-0002-3018-4416), Roberts, Kari (ORCID 0000-0001-7824-8311), Skrob-Martin, Sam, Rhemer, Danielle, Southerland, Sherry A.
Source: Education Sciences. 2021 11.
Availability: MDPI AG. Klybeckstrasse 64, 4057 Basel, Switzerland. e-mail: education@mdpi.com; e-mail: indexing@mdpi.com; Web site: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/education
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 20
Publication Date: 2021
Sponsoring Agency: National Science Foundation (NSF)
Contract Number: DRL1720587
DMR1644779
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: High Schools
Secondary Education
Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Thinking Skills, Science Instruction, Scientific Concepts, Biology, Test Construction, Multiple Choice Tests, Knowledge Level, Test Validity, Test Reliability, High School Teachers, College Faculty, Secondary School Science, College Science
ISSN: 2227-7102
Abstract: Assessments of scientific reasoning that capture the intertwining aspects of conceptual, procedural and epistemic knowledge are often associated with intensive qualitative analyses of student responses to open-ended questions, work products, interviews, discourse and classroom observations. While such analyses provide evaluations of students' reasoning skills, they are not scalable. The purpose of this study is to develop a three-tiered multiple-choice assessment to measure students' reasoning about biological phenomena and to understand the affordances and limitations of such an assessment. To validate the assessment and to understand what the assessment measures, qualitative and quantitative data were collected and analyzed, including read-aloud, focus group interviews and analysis of large sample data sets. These data served to validate our three-tiered assessment called the Assessment of Biological Reasoning (ABR) consisting of 10 question sets focused on core biological concepts. Further examination of our data suggests that students' reasoning is intertwined in such a way that procedural and epistemic knowledge is reliant on and given meaning by conceptual knowledge, an idea that pushes against the conceptualization that the latter forms of knowledge construction are more broadly applicable across disciplines.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2022
Accession Number: EJ1320912
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1320912
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1320912
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Describing the Development of the Assessment of Biological Reasoning (ABR)
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Schellinger%2C+Jennifer%22">Schellinger, Jennifer</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Enderle%2C+Patrick+J%2E%22">Enderle, Patrick J.</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3018-4416">0000-0002-3018-4416</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Roberts%2C+Kari%22">Roberts, Kari</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7824-8311">0000-0001-7824-8311</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Skrob-Martin%2C+Sam%22">Skrob-Martin, Sam</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rhemer%2C+Danielle%22">Rhemer, Danielle</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Southerland%2C+Sherry+A%2E%22">Southerland, Sherry A.</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Education+Sciences%22"><i>Education Sciences</i></searchLink>. 2021 11.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: MDPI AG. Klybeckstrasse 64, 4057 Basel, Switzerland. e-mail: education@mdpi.com; e-mail: indexing@mdpi.com; Web site: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/education
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 20
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2021
– Name: SourceSuprt
  Label: Sponsoring Agency
  Group: SrcSuprt
  Data: National Science Foundation (NSF)
– Name: NumberContract
  Label: Contract Number
  Group: NumCntrct
  Data: DRL1720587<br />DMR1644779
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22High+Schools%22">High Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Secondary+Education%22">Secondary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Thinking+Skills%22">Thinking Skills</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Science+Instruction%22">Science Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scientific+Concepts%22">Scientific Concepts</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Biology%22">Biology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Construction%22">Test Construction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Multiple+Choice+Tests%22">Multiple Choice Tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Knowledge+Level%22">Knowledge Level</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Validity%22">Test Validity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Reliability%22">Test Reliability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22High+School+Teachers%22">High School Teachers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Faculty%22">College Faculty</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Secondary+School+Science%22">Secondary School Science</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Science%22">College Science</searchLink>
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 2227-7102
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Assessments of scientific reasoning that capture the intertwining aspects of conceptual, procedural and epistemic knowledge are often associated with intensive qualitative analyses of student responses to open-ended questions, work products, interviews, discourse and classroom observations. While such analyses provide evaluations of students' reasoning skills, they are not scalable. The purpose of this study is to develop a three-tiered multiple-choice assessment to measure students' reasoning about biological phenomena and to understand the affordances and limitations of such an assessment. To validate the assessment and to understand what the assessment measures, qualitative and quantitative data were collected and analyzed, including read-aloud, focus group interviews and analysis of large sample data sets. These data served to validate our three-tiered assessment called the Assessment of Biological Reasoning (ABR) consisting of 10 question sets focused on core biological concepts. Further examination of our data suggests that students' reasoning is intertwined in such a way that procedural and epistemic knowledge is reliant on and given meaning by conceptual knowledge, an idea that pushes against the conceptualization that the latter forms of knowledge construction are more broadly applicable across disciplines.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2022
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1320912
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1320912
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 20
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Thinking Skills
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Science Instruction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Scientific Concepts
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Biology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Test Construction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Multiple Choice Tests
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Knowledge Level
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Test Validity
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Test Reliability
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: High School Teachers
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: College Faculty
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Secondary School Science
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: College Science
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Describing the Development of the Assessment of Biological Reasoning (ABR)
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Schellinger, Jennifer
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Enderle, Patrick J.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Roberts, Kari
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Skrob-Martin, Sam
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Rhemer, Danielle
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Southerland, Sherry A.
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 2021
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 2227-7102
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 11
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Education Sciences
              Type: main
ResultId 1