Describing the Development of the Assessment of Biological Reasoning (ABR)
Saved in:
| Title: | Describing the Development of the Assessment of Biological Reasoning (ABR) |
|---|---|
| Authors: | Schellinger, Jennifer, Enderle, Patrick J. (ORCID |
| Source: | Education Sciences. 2021 11. |
| Availability: | MDPI AG. Klybeckstrasse 64, 4057 Basel, Switzerland. e-mail: education@mdpi.com; e-mail: indexing@mdpi.com; Web site: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/education |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 20 |
| Publication Date: | 2021 |
| Sponsoring Agency: | National Science Foundation (NSF) |
| Contract Number: | DRL1720587 DMR1644779 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | High Schools Secondary Education Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Thinking Skills, Science Instruction, Scientific Concepts, Biology, Test Construction, Multiple Choice Tests, Knowledge Level, Test Validity, Test Reliability, High School Teachers, College Faculty, Secondary School Science, College Science |
| ISSN: | 2227-7102 |
| Abstract: | Assessments of scientific reasoning that capture the intertwining aspects of conceptual, procedural and epistemic knowledge are often associated with intensive qualitative analyses of student responses to open-ended questions, work products, interviews, discourse and classroom observations. While such analyses provide evaluations of students' reasoning skills, they are not scalable. The purpose of this study is to develop a three-tiered multiple-choice assessment to measure students' reasoning about biological phenomena and to understand the affordances and limitations of such an assessment. To validate the assessment and to understand what the assessment measures, qualitative and quantitative data were collected and analyzed, including read-aloud, focus group interviews and analysis of large sample data sets. These data served to validate our three-tiered assessment called the Assessment of Biological Reasoning (ABR) consisting of 10 question sets focused on core biological concepts. Further examination of our data suggests that students' reasoning is intertwined in such a way that procedural and epistemic knowledge is reliant on and given meaning by conceptual knowledge, an idea that pushes against the conceptualization that the latter forms of knowledge construction are more broadly applicable across disciplines. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2022 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1320912 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1320912 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1320912 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Describing the Development of the Assessment of Biological Reasoning (ABR) – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Schellinger%2C+Jennifer%22">Schellinger, Jennifer</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Enderle%2C+Patrick+J%2E%22">Enderle, Patrick J.</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3018-4416">0000-0002-3018-4416</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Roberts%2C+Kari%22">Roberts, Kari</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7824-8311">0000-0001-7824-8311</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Skrob-Martin%2C+Sam%22">Skrob-Martin, Sam</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rhemer%2C+Danielle%22">Rhemer, Danielle</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Southerland%2C+Sherry+A%2E%22">Southerland, Sherry A.</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Education+Sciences%22"><i>Education Sciences</i></searchLink>. 2021 11. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: MDPI AG. Klybeckstrasse 64, 4057 Basel, Switzerland. e-mail: education@mdpi.com; e-mail: indexing@mdpi.com; Web site: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/education – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 20 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2021 – Name: SourceSuprt Label: Sponsoring Agency Group: SrcSuprt Data: National Science Foundation (NSF) – Name: NumberContract Label: Contract Number Group: NumCntrct Data: DRL1720587<br />DMR1644779 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22High+Schools%22">High Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Secondary+Education%22">Secondary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Thinking+Skills%22">Thinking Skills</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Science+Instruction%22">Science Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scientific+Concepts%22">Scientific Concepts</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Biology%22">Biology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Construction%22">Test Construction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Multiple+Choice+Tests%22">Multiple Choice Tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Knowledge+Level%22">Knowledge Level</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Validity%22">Test Validity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Reliability%22">Test Reliability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22High+School+Teachers%22">High School Teachers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Faculty%22">College Faculty</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Secondary+School+Science%22">Secondary School Science</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Science%22">College Science</searchLink> – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 2227-7102 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Assessments of scientific reasoning that capture the intertwining aspects of conceptual, procedural and epistemic knowledge are often associated with intensive qualitative analyses of student responses to open-ended questions, work products, interviews, discourse and classroom observations. While such analyses provide evaluations of students' reasoning skills, they are not scalable. The purpose of this study is to develop a three-tiered multiple-choice assessment to measure students' reasoning about biological phenomena and to understand the affordances and limitations of such an assessment. To validate the assessment and to understand what the assessment measures, qualitative and quantitative data were collected and analyzed, including read-aloud, focus group interviews and analysis of large sample data sets. These data served to validate our three-tiered assessment called the Assessment of Biological Reasoning (ABR) consisting of 10 question sets focused on core biological concepts. Further examination of our data suggests that students' reasoning is intertwined in such a way that procedural and epistemic knowledge is reliant on and given meaning by conceptual knowledge, an idea that pushes against the conceptualization that the latter forms of knowledge construction are more broadly applicable across disciplines. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2022 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1320912 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1320912 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 20 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Thinking Skills Type: general – SubjectFull: Science Instruction Type: general – SubjectFull: Scientific Concepts Type: general – SubjectFull: Biology Type: general – SubjectFull: Test Construction Type: general – SubjectFull: Multiple Choice Tests Type: general – SubjectFull: Knowledge Level Type: general – SubjectFull: Test Validity Type: general – SubjectFull: Test Reliability Type: general – SubjectFull: High School Teachers Type: general – SubjectFull: College Faculty Type: general – SubjectFull: Secondary School Science Type: general – SubjectFull: College Science Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Describing the Development of the Assessment of Biological Reasoning (ABR) Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Schellinger, Jennifer – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Enderle, Patrick J. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Roberts, Kari – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Skrob-Martin, Sam – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Rhemer, Danielle – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Southerland, Sherry A. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2021 Identifiers: – Type: issn-electronic Value: 2227-7102 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 11 Titles: – TitleFull: Education Sciences Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |