View in EDS

Engineering Advice in Policy Making: A New Domain of Inquiry in Evidence and Policy

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Engineering Advice in Policy Making: A New Domain of Inquiry in Evidence and Policy
Language: English
Authors: Cooper, Adam C. G., Marvulli, Lorenzo, Black, Katie, Holmes, John, Mehta, Harshal
Source: Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice. Aug 2021 17(3):487-505.
Availability: Policy Press. University of Bristol, 1-9 Old Park Hill, Bristol BS2 8BB, UK. Tel: +44-117-954-5940; e-mail: pp-info@policypress.co.uk; Web site: https://policypress.co.uk/journals/evidence-and-policy
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 19
Publication Date: 2021
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Engineering, Policy Formation, Government Employees, Expertise, Foreign Countries, Evidence Based Practice
Geographic Terms: United Kingdom
DOI: 10.1332/174426420X15852883943798
ISSN: 1744-2648
Abstract: Background: Academic research on technical advice to policy commonly focuses on social and related policy areas such as health, education and crime (Oliver et al. 2014) and disciplinary advice from science disciplines (Jasanoff 1994; Millstone and van Zwanenberg 2001). Little or no prior research in the social sciences have explored engineering expertise in policy domains where such advice is critical (e.g. energy policy). Aims and objectives: We aim to establish 'engineering advice' as a new domain of inquiry by showing how civil servants view it as distinctive (from 'science advice'), important and similar to policy making - implying it can clash or complement it. Methods: 18 qualitative interviews with a purposive sample of officials across a UK ministry were conducted by the authors (all but one of whom were civil servants) in 2012. The qualitative data were thematically coded to address the study aims. Findings: A majority of officials spontaneously identified engineering expertise as both distinctive and important for their work. There was clear evidence that it both complemented and clashed with policymaking. Discussion and conclusions: We identified a range of interactions that imply a need to consider styles of management internal deployment of experts within policy organisations as well as the implications for policy making and engineering expertise given the way practices overlap. Further research on the ontological, epistemological nature of engineering as it relates to policy making is needed if governments and therefore society are to fully benefit from engineering advice.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2022
Accession Number: EJ1321862
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1321862
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Engineering Advice in Policy Making: A New Domain of Inquiry in Evidence and Policy
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cooper%2C+Adam+C%2E+G%2E%22">Cooper, Adam C. G.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Marvulli%2C+Lorenzo%22">Marvulli, Lorenzo</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Black%2C+Katie%22">Black, Katie</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Holmes%2C+John%22">Holmes, John</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mehta%2C+Harshal%22">Mehta, Harshal</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Evidence+%26+Policy%3A+A+Journal+of+Research%2C+Debate+and+Practice%22"><i>Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice</i></searchLink>. Aug 2021 17(3):487-505.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: Policy Press. University of Bristol, 1-9 Old Park Hill, Bristol BS2 8BB, UK. Tel: +44-117-954-5940; e-mail: pp-info@policypress.co.uk; Web site: https://policypress.co.uk/journals/evidence-and-policy
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 19
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2021
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Engineering%22">Engineering</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Policy+Formation%22">Policy Formation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Government+Employees%22">Government Employees</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Expertise%22">Expertise</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evidence+Based+Practice%22">Evidence Based Practice</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+Kingdom%22">United Kingdom</searchLink>
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1332/174426420X15852883943798
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 1744-2648
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Background: Academic research on technical advice to policy commonly focuses on social and related policy areas such as health, education and crime (Oliver et al. 2014) and disciplinary advice from science disciplines (Jasanoff 1994; Millstone and van Zwanenberg 2001). Little or no prior research in the social sciences have explored engineering expertise in policy domains where such advice is critical (e.g. energy policy). Aims and objectives: We aim to establish 'engineering advice' as a new domain of inquiry by showing how civil servants view it as distinctive (from 'science advice'), important and similar to policy making - implying it can clash or complement it. Methods: 18 qualitative interviews with a purposive sample of officials across a UK ministry were conducted by the authors (all but one of whom were civil servants) in 2012. The qualitative data were thematically coded to address the study aims. Findings: A majority of officials spontaneously identified engineering expertise as both distinctive and important for their work. There was clear evidence that it both complemented and clashed with policymaking. Discussion and conclusions: We identified a range of interactions that imply a need to consider styles of management internal deployment of experts within policy organisations as well as the implications for policy making and engineering expertise given the way practices overlap. Further research on the ontological, epistemological nature of engineering as it relates to policy making is needed if governments and therefore society are to fully benefit from engineering advice.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2022
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1321862
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1321862
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1332/174426420X15852883943798
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 19
        StartPage: 487
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Engineering
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Policy Formation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Government Employees
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Expertise
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Evidence Based Practice
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: United Kingdom
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Engineering Advice in Policy Making: A New Domain of Inquiry in Evidence and Policy
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Cooper, Adam C. G.
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Marvulli, Lorenzo
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Black, Katie
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Holmes, John
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Mehta, Harshal
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 08
              Type: published
              Y: 2021
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 1744-2648
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 17
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice
              Type: main
ResultId 1