How Stereotypes and Relationships Influence Women and Underrepresented Minority Students' Fit in Engineering
Saved in:
| Title: | How Stereotypes and Relationships Influence Women and Underrepresented Minority Students' Fit in Engineering |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Campbell-Montalvo, Rebecca (ORCID |
| Source: | Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Apr 2022 59(4):656-692. |
| Availability: | Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 37 |
| Publication Date: | 2022 |
| Sponsoring Agency: | National Science Foundation (NSF) |
| Contract Number: | 1432297 1664366 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Sex Stereotypes, Interpersonal Relationship, Females, Minority Group Students, Disproportionate Representation, Engineering Education, Undergraduate Students, Student Experience, Sense of Community, Social Capital, Student Attitudes, Racial Bias, Gender Bias, Student Organizations |
| DOI: | 10.1002/tea.21740 |
| ISSN: | 0022-4308 |
| Abstract: | Women and underrepresented minority (URM) undergraduates declare and complete science, technology, engineering, and mathematics majors at different rates in comparison to majority groups. Explanations of these differences have long been deficit oriented, focusing on aptitude or similar characteristics, but more recent work focuses on institutional contexts, such as academic climate and feelings of belonging (fit). This study examines the experiences of women and URM students in engineering undergraduate programs, focusing on how they fit, experiential factors affecting fit, and how fit is mitigated by social relationships from their networks and organizations in which they participate (i.e., social capital). Thematic analysis of 55 women and URM interviewee responses shows that students who fit well were those with majority characteristics, including race (i.e., White, White-passing) and gender (i.e., men, masculine appearance), and those in groups well represented in their programs numerically (i.e., men, Asian). In contrast, women and Black students encountered threats to their fit due to stereotyping from bias and differential treatment from others (i.e., being excluded from group work). However, students received advice from their social networks (i.e., family, professors) in which they were warned to expect discrimination, or through organizations in which they participated (i.e., National Association of Black Engineers) where their sense of community was expanded. The advice and resources provided through this network-based and participatory social capital mitigated fit for women and Black students, albeit in different ways, helping to preserve their feelings of belonging and promote their persistence in engineering. We offer suggestions to enact university policies to increase access to social capital with homophilious alters and educational opportunities for majority groups. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2022 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1327959 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1327959 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: How Stereotypes and Relationships Influence Women and Underrepresented Minority Students' Fit in Engineering – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Campbell-Montalvo%2C+Rebecca%22">Campbell-Montalvo, Rebecca</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2671-8056">0000-0003-2671-8056</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kersaint%2C+Gladis%22">Kersaint, Gladis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Smith%2C+Chrystal+A%2E+S%2E%22">Smith, Chrystal A. S.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Puccia%2C+Ellen%22">Puccia, Ellen</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Skvoretz%2C+John%22">Skvoretz, John</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wao%2C+Hesborn%22">Wao, Hesborn</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Martin%2C+Julie+P%2E%22">Martin, Julie P.</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1962-8394">0000-0003-1962-8394</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22MacDonald%2C+George%22">MacDonald, George</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lee%2C+Reginald%22">Lee, Reginald</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Journal+of+Research+in+Science+Teaching%22"><i>Journal of Research in Science Teaching</i></searchLink>. Apr 2022 59(4):656-692. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 37 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2022 – Name: SourceSuprt Label: Sponsoring Agency Group: SrcSuprt Data: National Science Foundation (NSF) – Name: NumberContract Label: Contract Number Group: NumCntrct Data: 1432297<br />1664366 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sex+Stereotypes%22">Sex Stereotypes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interpersonal+Relationship%22">Interpersonal Relationship</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Females%22">Females</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Minority+Group+Students%22">Minority Group Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Disproportionate+Representation%22">Disproportionate Representation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Engineering+Education%22">Engineering Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Undergraduate+Students%22">Undergraduate Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Experience%22">Student Experience</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sense+of+Community%22">Sense of Community</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+Capital%22">Social Capital</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Attitudes%22">Student Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Racial+Bias%22">Racial Bias</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Gender+Bias%22">Gender Bias</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Organizations%22">Student Organizations</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1002/tea.21740 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 0022-4308 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Women and underrepresented minority (URM) undergraduates declare and complete science, technology, engineering, and mathematics majors at different rates in comparison to majority groups. Explanations of these differences have long been deficit oriented, focusing on aptitude or similar characteristics, but more recent work focuses on institutional contexts, such as academic climate and feelings of belonging (fit). This study examines the experiences of women and URM students in engineering undergraduate programs, focusing on how they fit, experiential factors affecting fit, and how fit is mitigated by social relationships from their networks and organizations in which they participate (i.e., social capital). Thematic analysis of 55 women and URM interviewee responses shows that students who fit well were those with majority characteristics, including race (i.e., White, White-passing) and gender (i.e., men, masculine appearance), and those in groups well represented in their programs numerically (i.e., men, Asian). In contrast, women and Black students encountered threats to their fit due to stereotyping from bias and differential treatment from others (i.e., being excluded from group work). However, students received advice from their social networks (i.e., family, professors) in which they were warned to expect discrimination, or through organizations in which they participated (i.e., National Association of Black Engineers) where their sense of community was expanded. The advice and resources provided through this network-based and participatory social capital mitigated fit for women and Black students, albeit in different ways, helping to preserve their feelings of belonging and promote their persistence in engineering. We offer suggestions to enact university policies to increase access to social capital with homophilious alters and educational opportunities for majority groups. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2022 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1327959 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1327959 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1002/tea.21740 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 37 StartPage: 656 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Sex Stereotypes Type: general – SubjectFull: Interpersonal Relationship Type: general – SubjectFull: Females Type: general – SubjectFull: Minority Group Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Disproportionate Representation Type: general – SubjectFull: Engineering Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Undergraduate Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Experience Type: general – SubjectFull: Sense of Community Type: general – SubjectFull: Social Capital Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: Racial Bias Type: general – SubjectFull: Gender Bias Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Organizations Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: How Stereotypes and Relationships Influence Women and Underrepresented Minority Students' Fit in Engineering Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Campbell-Montalvo, Rebecca – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Kersaint, Gladis – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Smith, Chrystal A. S. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Puccia, Ellen – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Skvoretz, John – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Wao, Hesborn – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Martin, Julie P. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: MacDonald, George – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Lee, Reginald IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 04 Type: published Y: 2022 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0022-4308 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 59 – Type: issue Value: 4 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Research in Science Teaching Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |