Corpus Analysis on Students' Counter and Support Arguments in Argumentative Writing
Saved in:
| Title: | Corpus Analysis on Students' Counter and Support Arguments in Argumentative Writing |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | McCarthy, Philip M. (ORCID |
| Source: | Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction. 2022 12(1):256-271. |
| Availability: | Pegem Academy Publishing and Educational Guidance Services TLC. Mesrutiyet Caddesi, No: 45, Ankara, Kizilay 06420, Turkey. e-mail: editor@pegegog.net; Web site: http://www.pegegog.net/ |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 16 |
| Publication Date: | 2022 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Computational Linguistics, Connected Discourse, Discourse Analysis, Readability, Classification, Language Usage, Language Processing, Cognitive Ability, Persuasive Discourse, College Students, Essays, Writing Evaluation, Computer Software, Advanced Students, Writing Instruction, Grades (Scholastic), Structural Analysis (Linguistics) |
| ISSN: | 2146-0655 |
| Abstract: | This study analyzes the linguistic features of counter-arguments and support arguments using two computational linguistic tools: Coh-Metrix and Gramulator. The research question investigates whether counter-argument paragraphs and support paragraphs are different in terms of their linguistic features. To conduct this study, a corpus of 78 argumentative papers was collected. The paragraphs in the papers were categorized in terms of their function. The categories included functions of Support, Counter-argument, Expostulation, Counter-argument and Expostulation, Background, and Other. The paragraphs were analyzed for their readability and writing quality through Coh-Metrix. With the exception of the measure of Deep Cohesion, the Coh-Metrix results suggest minimal differences in terms of readability and writing quality between counter-argument and support paragraphs. Following the Coh-Metrix analysis, both counter-argument and support corpora were analyzed through Gramulator for their lexical features. The Gramulator results suggest the presence of causal language and fixed expressions in counterarguments, as well as some tagged language in support arguments. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2022 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1329805 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1329805 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1329805 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Corpus Analysis on Students' Counter and Support Arguments in Argumentative Writing – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22McCarthy%2C+Philip+M%2E%22">McCarthy, Philip M.</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5869-3709">0000-0001-5869-3709</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kaddoura%2C+Noor+W%2E%22">Kaddoura, Noor W.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Al-Harthy%2C+Ayah%22">Al-Harthy, Ayah</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Thomas%2C+Anuja+M%2E%22">Thomas, Anuja M.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Duran%2C+Nicholas+D%2E%22">Duran, Nicholas D.</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ahmed%2C+Khawlah%22">Ahmed, Khawlah</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Pegem+Journal+of+Education+and+Instruction%22"><i>Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction</i></searchLink>. 2022 12(1):256-271. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Pegem Academy Publishing and Educational Guidance Services TLC. Mesrutiyet Caddesi, No: 45, Ankara, Kizilay 06420, Turkey. e-mail: editor@pegegog.net; Web site: http://www.pegegog.net/ – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 16 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2022 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computational+Linguistics%22">Computational Linguistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Connected+Discourse%22">Connected Discourse</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Discourse+Analysis%22">Discourse Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Readability%22">Readability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Classification%22">Classification</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Language+Usage%22">Language Usage</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Language+Processing%22">Language Processing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognitive+Ability%22">Cognitive Ability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Persuasive+Discourse%22">Persuasive Discourse</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Students%22">College Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Essays%22">Essays</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+Evaluation%22">Writing Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+Software%22">Computer Software</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Advanced+Students%22">Advanced Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+Instruction%22">Writing Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grades+%28Scholastic%29%22">Grades (Scholastic)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Structural+Analysis+%28Linguistics%29%22">Structural Analysis (Linguistics)</searchLink> – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 2146-0655 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This study analyzes the linguistic features of counter-arguments and support arguments using two computational linguistic tools: Coh-Metrix and Gramulator. The research question investigates whether counter-argument paragraphs and support paragraphs are different in terms of their linguistic features. To conduct this study, a corpus of 78 argumentative papers was collected. The paragraphs in the papers were categorized in terms of their function. The categories included functions of Support, Counter-argument, Expostulation, Counter-argument and Expostulation, Background, and Other. The paragraphs were analyzed for their readability and writing quality through Coh-Metrix. With the exception of the measure of Deep Cohesion, the Coh-Metrix results suggest minimal differences in terms of readability and writing quality between counter-argument and support paragraphs. Following the Coh-Metrix analysis, both counter-argument and support corpora were analyzed through Gramulator for their lexical features. The Gramulator results suggest the presence of causal language and fixed expressions in counterarguments, as well as some tagged language in support arguments. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2022 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1329805 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1329805 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 16 StartPage: 256 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Computational Linguistics Type: general – SubjectFull: Connected Discourse Type: general – SubjectFull: Discourse Analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Readability Type: general – SubjectFull: Classification Type: general – SubjectFull: Language Usage Type: general – SubjectFull: Language Processing Type: general – SubjectFull: Cognitive Ability Type: general – SubjectFull: Persuasive Discourse Type: general – SubjectFull: College Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Essays Type: general – SubjectFull: Writing Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Computer Software Type: general – SubjectFull: Advanced Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Writing Instruction Type: general – SubjectFull: Grades (Scholastic) Type: general – SubjectFull: Structural Analysis (Linguistics) Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Corpus Analysis on Students' Counter and Support Arguments in Argumentative Writing Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: McCarthy, Philip M. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Kaddoura, Noor W. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Al-Harthy, Ayah – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Thomas, Anuja M. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Duran, Nicholas D. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ahmed, Khawlah IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2022 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 2146-0655 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 12 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |