A Causal-Comparative Study of South African Pre-Service Primary Mathematics Teachers' Spatial Visualization Ability: Does Common Content Knowledge Matter?

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: A Causal-Comparative Study of South African Pre-Service Primary Mathematics Teachers' Spatial Visualization Ability: Does Common Content Knowledge Matter?
Language: English
Authors: Shongwe, Benjamin (ORCID 0000-0001-8083-6462)
Source: International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. 2022 53(9):2338-2363.
Availability: Taylor & Francis. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 26
Publication Date: 2022
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Tests/Questionnaires
Education Level: High Schools
Secondary Education
Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Elementary Education
Descriptors: Mathematics Skills, Pedagogical Content Knowledge, Spatial Ability, Visualization, Mathematics Teachers, Teaching Methods, Comparative Analysis, Preservice Teachers, Teacher Education Programs, Elementary School Teachers, Misconceptions, Foreign Countries
Geographic Terms: South Africa
DOI: 10.1080/0020739X.2020.1869333
ISSN: 0020-739X
1464-5211
Abstract: This study used a modified mathematical knowledge for teaching (MKT) framework to compare the "common content knowledge" (CCK) of two groups of purposively selected pre-service primary mathematics teachers (n = 86) in relation to spatial visualization. Specifically, thirty-five pre-service teachers (n[subscript 1] = 35) with a pure school mathematics background and fifty-one pre-service teachers (n[subscript 2] = 51) with a high school mathematical literacy background worked on problems that involved spatial objects, their properties and relationships. The responses of pre-service teachers with a mathematical literacy content background to the "Surface Development Test" (SDT) were significantly different from their counterparts' which suggested that their CCK in relation to spatial visualization was thin. Analysis of the "Probes" questionnaire which inquired about the pre-service teachers' views on the concept of spatial visualization showed that misconceptions hindered their performance. Future research directions are discussed.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2023
Accession Number: EJ1367167
Database: ERIC
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Description
Abstract:This study used a modified mathematical knowledge for teaching (MKT) framework to compare the "common content knowledge" (CCK) of two groups of purposively selected pre-service primary mathematics teachers (n = 86) in relation to spatial visualization. Specifically, thirty-five pre-service teachers (n[subscript 1] = 35) with a pure school mathematics background and fifty-one pre-service teachers (n[subscript 2] = 51) with a high school mathematical literacy background worked on problems that involved spatial objects, their properties and relationships. The responses of pre-service teachers with a mathematical literacy content background to the "Surface Development Test" (SDT) were significantly different from their counterparts' which suggested that their CCK in relation to spatial visualization was thin. Analysis of the "Probes" questionnaire which inquired about the pre-service teachers' views on the concept of spatial visualization showed that misconceptions hindered their performance. Future research directions are discussed.
ISSN:0020-739X
1464-5211
DOI:10.1080/0020739X.2020.1869333