How Effective Is Second Language Incidental Vocabulary Learning? A Meta-Analysis
Saved in:
| Title: | How Effective Is Second Language Incidental Vocabulary Learning? A Meta-Analysis |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Webb, Stuart (ORCID |
| Source: | Language Teaching. Apr 2023 56(2):161-180. |
| Availability: | Cambridge University Press. 100 Brook Hill Drive, West Nyack, NY 10994. Tel: 800-872-7423; Tel: 845-353-7500; Fax: 845-353-4141; e-mail: subscriptions_newyork@cambridge.org; Web site: https://www.cambridge.org/core/what-we-publish/journals |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 20 |
| Publication Date: | 2023 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Information Analyses |
| Descriptors: | Second Language Learning, Vocabulary Development, Incidental Learning, Individual Characteristics, Instructional Materials, Learning Activities |
| DOI: | 10.1017/S0261444822000507 |
| ISSN: | 0261-4448 1475-3049 |
| Abstract: | There is a great deal of variation in gains found between studies of second language (L2) incidental vocabulary learning, as well as many factors that affect learning. This meta-analysis investigated the effects of exposure to L2 meaning-focused input on incidental vocabulary learning with an aim to clarify the proportional gains that occur through meaning-focused learning. Twenty-four primary studies were retrieved providing 29 different effect sizes and a total sample size of 2,771 participants (1,517 in experimental groups vs. 1,254 in control groups). Results showed large overall effects for incidental vocabulary learning on first and follow-up posttests. Mean proportions of target words learned ranged from 9-18% on immediate posttests, and 6-17% on delayed posttests. Incidental L2 vocabulary learning gains were similar across reading (17%, 15%), listening (15%, 13%), and reading while listening (13%, 17%) conditions on immediate and delayed posttest. In contrast, the proportion of words learned in viewing conditions on immediate posttests was smaller (7%, 5%). Findings also revealed that the amount of incidental learning varies according to a range of moderator variables including learner characteristics (L2 proficiency, institutional levels), materials (text type and audience), learning activities (spacing, mode of input), and methodological features (approaches to controlling prior word knowledge). |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2023 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1373102 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1373102 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: How Effective Is Second Language Incidental Vocabulary Learning? A Meta-Analysis – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Webb%2C+Stuart%22">Webb, Stuart</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8297-4997">0000-0002-8297-4997</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Uchihara%2C+Takumi%22">Uchihara, Takumi</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Yanagisawa%2C+Akifumi%22">Yanagisawa, Akifumi</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Language+Teaching%22"><i>Language Teaching</i></searchLink>. Apr 2023 56(2):161-180. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Cambridge University Press. 100 Brook Hill Drive, West Nyack, NY 10994. Tel: 800-872-7423; Tel: 845-353-7500; Fax: 845-353-4141; e-mail: subscriptions_newyork@cambridge.org; Web site: https://www.cambridge.org/core/what-we-publish/journals – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 20 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2023 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Information Analyses – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Second+Language+Learning%22">Second Language Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Vocabulary+Development%22">Vocabulary Development</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Incidental+Learning%22">Incidental Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Individual+Characteristics%22">Individual Characteristics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Instructional+Materials%22">Instructional Materials</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Learning+Activities%22">Learning Activities</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1017/S0261444822000507 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 0261-4448<br />1475-3049 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: There is a great deal of variation in gains found between studies of second language (L2) incidental vocabulary learning, as well as many factors that affect learning. This meta-analysis investigated the effects of exposure to L2 meaning-focused input on incidental vocabulary learning with an aim to clarify the proportional gains that occur through meaning-focused learning. Twenty-four primary studies were retrieved providing 29 different effect sizes and a total sample size of 2,771 participants (1,517 in experimental groups vs. 1,254 in control groups). Results showed large overall effects for incidental vocabulary learning on first and follow-up posttests. Mean proportions of target words learned ranged from 9-18% on immediate posttests, and 6-17% on delayed posttests. Incidental L2 vocabulary learning gains were similar across reading (17%, 15%), listening (15%, 13%), and reading while listening (13%, 17%) conditions on immediate and delayed posttest. In contrast, the proportion of words learned in viewing conditions on immediate posttests was smaller (7%, 5%). Findings also revealed that the amount of incidental learning varies according to a range of moderator variables including learner characteristics (L2 proficiency, institutional levels), materials (text type and audience), learning activities (spacing, mode of input), and methodological features (approaches to controlling prior word knowledge). – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2023 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1373102 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1373102 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1017/S0261444822000507 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 20 StartPage: 161 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Second Language Learning Type: general – SubjectFull: Vocabulary Development Type: general – SubjectFull: Incidental Learning Type: general – SubjectFull: Individual Characteristics Type: general – SubjectFull: Instructional Materials Type: general – SubjectFull: Learning Activities Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: How Effective Is Second Language Incidental Vocabulary Learning? A Meta-Analysis Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Webb, Stuart – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Uchihara, Takumi – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Yanagisawa, Akifumi IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 04 Type: published Y: 2023 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0261-4448 – Type: issn-electronic Value: 1475-3049 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 56 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: Language Teaching Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |