Fair High-Stakes Assessment in the Long Shadow of COVID-19

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Fair High-Stakes Assessment in the Long Shadow of COVID-19
Language: English
Authors: Nisbet, Isabel, Shaw, Stuart
Source: Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. 2022 29(5):518-533.
Availability: Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 16
Publication Date: 2022
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Evaluative
Descriptors: High Stakes Tests, Test Bias, COVID-19, Pandemics, Social Justice, Student Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Foreign Countries, Test Validity
Geographic Terms: United Kingdom (England)
DOI: 10.1080/0969594X.2022.2067834
ISSN: 0969-594X
1465-329X
Abstract: Fairness in assessment has become increasingly topical and controversial in recent years. Assessment theoreticians are writing more about fairness and assessment practitioners have developed processes and good practice to minimise unfairness. There is also increased scrutiny by students, parents and the wider public--not only of the fairness of assessments themselves and their outcomes, but of their use, notably for selection for college or university. This is in a context of continued awareness of inequalities in society and their impact on education and assessment. And on top of all these questions has been the impact--and the continuing long shadow--of COVID. Can there be fair assessment in such an unfair world? We consider three types of challenge to fair assessment: (1) Theoretical challenges; (2) Challenges from thinking about social justice; and (3) Challenges from the way that statistics were used to award assessment outcomes in 2020 (particularly in England).
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2023
Accession Number: EJ1376603
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1376603
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Fair High-Stakes Assessment in the Long Shadow of COVID-19
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Nisbet%2C+Isabel%22">Nisbet, Isabel</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Shaw%2C+Stuart%22">Shaw, Stuart</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Assessment+in+Education%3A+Principles%2C+Policy+%26+Practice%22"><i>Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice</i></searchLink>. 2022 29(5):518-533.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 16
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2022
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Evaluative
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22High+Stakes+Tests%22">High Stakes Tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Bias%22">Test Bias</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22COVID-19%22">COVID-19</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Pandemics%22">Pandemics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+Justice%22">Social Justice</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Evaluation%22">Student Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+Methods%22">Evaluation Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Validity%22">Test Validity</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+Kingdom+%28England%29%22">United Kingdom (England)</searchLink>
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1080/0969594X.2022.2067834
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 0969-594X<br />1465-329X
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Fairness in assessment has become increasingly topical and controversial in recent years. Assessment theoreticians are writing more about fairness and assessment practitioners have developed processes and good practice to minimise unfairness. There is also increased scrutiny by students, parents and the wider public--not only of the fairness of assessments themselves and their outcomes, but of their use, notably for selection for college or university. This is in a context of continued awareness of inequalities in society and their impact on education and assessment. And on top of all these questions has been the impact--and the continuing long shadow--of COVID. Can there be fair assessment in such an unfair world? We consider three types of challenge to fair assessment: (1) Theoretical challenges; (2) Challenges from thinking about social justice; and (3) Challenges from the way that statistics were used to award assessment outcomes in 2020 (particularly in England).
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2023
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1376603
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1376603
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/0969594X.2022.2067834
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 16
        StartPage: 518
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: High Stakes Tests
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Test Bias
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: COVID-19
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Pandemics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Social Justice
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Student Evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Evaluation Methods
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Test Validity
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: United Kingdom (England)
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Fair High-Stakes Assessment in the Long Shadow of COVID-19
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Nisbet, Isabel
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Shaw, Stuart
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 2022
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 0969-594X
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 1465-329X
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 29
            – Type: issue
              Value: 5
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice
              Type: main
ResultId 1