Educational Institutions Selection Using Analytic Hierarchy Process Based on National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF) Criteria
Saved in:
| Title: | Educational Institutions Selection Using Analytic Hierarchy Process Based on National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF) Criteria |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Ahirwal, Mitul Kumar, Kumar, Prabhat (ORCID |
| Source: | Interchange: A Quarterly Review of Education. Jun 2023 54(2):203-227. |
| Availability: | Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/ |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 25 |
| Publication Date: | 2023 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Descriptive |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Foreign Countries, College Choice, Selection Criteria, Decision Making, Computation, Models, Institutional Characteristics, Achievement Rating, Universities, College Students, Admission Criteria, Evaluation Criteria |
| Geographic Terms: | India |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s10780-023-09488-6 |
| ISSN: | 0826-4805 1573-1790 |
| Abstract: | Nowadays, with increasing competitiveness in every field, securing a good job may be difficult. In this connection, students aiming to get into the best educational institution (EI) would give them their best chance of quality education and good job opportunities. Institutional evaluation and selection are complex tasks that must simultaneously include different aspects and evaluation criteria. This work addresses the EI selection dilemma by formulating a multi-criteria decision-making computational model. This work utilizes the National Institutional Ranking Framework approved by the Ministry of Human Resource Development India to rank higher education institutions in India. The problem was converted into a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model based on the accumulated criteria. This MCDM problem was further solved with the help of the Analytic Hierarchy Process by formulating a multi-criteria decision-making model for EI/university selection. Further, a new technique based on separated criteria benefits and recommendations (SCBR) has been incorporated with AHP, resulting in the advancement of the basic AHP method. The proposed technique allows comprehensibility of the qualitative method while maintaining the precision of the quantitative methodology for institutional selection of undergraduate and postgraduate students. This work is beneficial not only for the students but also for the academic job aspirants for choosing the appropriate institution. The proposed work is also applicable as a tool for assessing the effectiveness of higher education institutions. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2023 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1378056 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1378056 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Educational Institutions Selection Using Analytic Hierarchy Process Based on National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF) Criteria – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ahirwal%2C+Mitul+Kumar%22">Ahirwal, Mitul Kumar</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kumar%2C+Prabhat%22">Kumar, Prabhat</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2062-1504">0000-0002-2062-1504</externalLink>) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Interchange%3A+A+Quarterly+Review+of+Education%22"><i>Interchange: A Quarterly Review of Education</i></searchLink>. Jun 2023 54(2):203-227. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/ – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 25 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2023 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Descriptive – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Choice%22">College Choice</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Selection+Criteria%22">Selection Criteria</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Decision+Making%22">Decision Making</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computation%22">Computation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Models%22">Models</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Institutional+Characteristics%22">Institutional Characteristics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Achievement+Rating%22">Achievement Rating</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Universities%22">Universities</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Students%22">College Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Admission+Criteria%22">Admission Criteria</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+Criteria%22">Evaluation Criteria</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22India%22">India</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1007/s10780-023-09488-6 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 0826-4805<br />1573-1790 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Nowadays, with increasing competitiveness in every field, securing a good job may be difficult. In this connection, students aiming to get into the best educational institution (EI) would give them their best chance of quality education and good job opportunities. Institutional evaluation and selection are complex tasks that must simultaneously include different aspects and evaluation criteria. This work addresses the EI selection dilemma by formulating a multi-criteria decision-making computational model. This work utilizes the National Institutional Ranking Framework approved by the Ministry of Human Resource Development India to rank higher education institutions in India. The problem was converted into a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model based on the accumulated criteria. This MCDM problem was further solved with the help of the Analytic Hierarchy Process by formulating a multi-criteria decision-making model for EI/university selection. Further, a new technique based on separated criteria benefits and recommendations (SCBR) has been incorporated with AHP, resulting in the advancement of the basic AHP method. The proposed technique allows comprehensibility of the qualitative method while maintaining the precision of the quantitative methodology for institutional selection of undergraduate and postgraduate students. This work is beneficial not only for the students but also for the academic job aspirants for choosing the appropriate institution. The proposed work is also applicable as a tool for assessing the effectiveness of higher education institutions. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2023 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1378056 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1378056 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1007/s10780-023-09488-6 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 25 StartPage: 203 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries Type: general – SubjectFull: College Choice Type: general – SubjectFull: Selection Criteria Type: general – SubjectFull: Decision Making Type: general – SubjectFull: Computation Type: general – SubjectFull: Models Type: general – SubjectFull: Institutional Characteristics Type: general – SubjectFull: Achievement Rating Type: general – SubjectFull: Universities Type: general – SubjectFull: College Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Admission Criteria Type: general – SubjectFull: Evaluation Criteria Type: general – SubjectFull: India Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Educational Institutions Selection Using Analytic Hierarchy Process Based on National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF) Criteria Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ahirwal, Mitul Kumar – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Kumar, Prabhat IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 06 Type: published Y: 2023 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0826-4805 – Type: issn-electronic Value: 1573-1790 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 54 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: Interchange: A Quarterly Review of Education Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |