The Devil Is in the Details: A Randomized Experiment Assessing the Effect of Providing Examples in a Survey Question across Countries
Saved in:
| Title: | The Devil Is in the Details: A Randomized Experiment Assessing the Effect of Providing Examples in a Survey Question across Countries |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Aizpurua, Eva (ORCID |
| Source: | Field Methods. Aug 2023 35(3):198-218. |
| Availability: | SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 21 |
| Publication Date: | 2023 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Descriptors: | Foreign Countries, Surveys, Response Rates (Questionnaires), Test Items, Confidence Testing, Social Media, Effect Size, Models, Cross Cultural Studies |
| Geographic Terms: | Estonia, United Kingdom (Great Britain), Slovenia |
| DOI: | 10.1177/1525822X221115506 |
| ISSN: | 1525-822X 1552-3969 |
| Abstract: | Despite the widespread use of examples in survey questions, very few studies have examined their impact on survey responses, and the evidence is mainly based on data collected in the United States using questionnaires in English. This study builds on previous research by examining the effects of providing examples using data from a cross-national probability-based web panel implemented in Estonia (n = 730), Great Britain (n = 685), and Slovenia (n = 529) during Round 8 of the European Social Survey (2017/18). Respondents were randomly assigned a survey question measuring confidence in social media using Facebook and Twitter as examples, or another condition in which no examples were offered. The results show that confidence in social media was significantly lower in the example condition, although the effect size was small. Confidence in social media varied across countries, and the effect of providing examples was heterogeneous across countries and education levels. The implications of these findings are discussed. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2023 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1384068 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1384068 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: The Devil Is in the Details: A Randomized Experiment Assessing the Effect of Providing Examples in a Survey Question across Countries – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Aizpurua%2C+Eva%22">Aizpurua, Eva</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7045-5535">0000-0001-7045-5535</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Bottoni%2C+Gianmaria%22">Bottoni, Gianmaria</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Fitzgerald%2C+Rory%22">Fitzgerald, Rory</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Field+Methods%22"><i>Field Methods</i></searchLink>. Aug 2023 35(3):198-218. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: https://sagepub.com – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 21 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2023 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Surveys%22">Surveys</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Response+Rates+%28Questionnaires%29%22">Response Rates (Questionnaires)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Items%22">Test Items</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Confidence+Testing%22">Confidence Testing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Social+Media%22">Social Media</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Effect+Size%22">Effect Size</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Models%22">Models</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cross+Cultural+Studies%22">Cross Cultural Studies</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Estonia%22">Estonia</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+Kingdom+%28Great+Britain%29%22">United Kingdom (Great Britain)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Slovenia%22">Slovenia</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1177/1525822X221115506 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 1525-822X<br />1552-3969 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Despite the widespread use of examples in survey questions, very few studies have examined their impact on survey responses, and the evidence is mainly based on data collected in the United States using questionnaires in English. This study builds on previous research by examining the effects of providing examples using data from a cross-national probability-based web panel implemented in Estonia (n = 730), Great Britain (n = 685), and Slovenia (n = 529) during Round 8 of the European Social Survey (2017/18). Respondents were randomly assigned a survey question measuring confidence in social media using Facebook and Twitter as examples, or another condition in which no examples were offered. The results show that confidence in social media was significantly lower in the example condition, although the effect size was small. Confidence in social media varied across countries, and the effect of providing examples was heterogeneous across countries and education levels. The implications of these findings are discussed. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2023 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1384068 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1384068 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1177/1525822X221115506 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 21 StartPage: 198 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries Type: general – SubjectFull: Surveys Type: general – SubjectFull: Response Rates (Questionnaires) Type: general – SubjectFull: Test Items Type: general – SubjectFull: Confidence Testing Type: general – SubjectFull: Social Media Type: general – SubjectFull: Effect Size Type: general – SubjectFull: Models Type: general – SubjectFull: Cross Cultural Studies Type: general – SubjectFull: Estonia Type: general – SubjectFull: United Kingdom (Great Britain) Type: general – SubjectFull: Slovenia Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: The Devil Is in the Details: A Randomized Experiment Assessing the Effect of Providing Examples in a Survey Question across Countries Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Aizpurua, Eva – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Bottoni, Gianmaria – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Fitzgerald, Rory IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 08 Type: published Y: 2023 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 1525-822X – Type: issn-electronic Value: 1552-3969 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 35 – Type: issue Value: 3 Titles: – TitleFull: Field Methods Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |