Metacognitive Intervention: Can It Solve Suspension of Sense-Making in Integration Problem-Solving?
Saved in:
| Title: | Metacognitive Intervention: Can It Solve Suspension of Sense-Making in Integration Problem-Solving? |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Alifiani, Subanji, Permadi, Hendro, Irawati, Santi |
| Source: | Mathematics Teaching Research Journal. Spr 2023 15(1):44-66. |
| Availability: | City University of New York. Creative Commons. 205 East 42 Street, New York, NY 10017. Web site: https://commons.hostos.cuny.edu/mtrj |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 23 |
| Publication Date: | 2023 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Metacognition, Intervention, Concept Formation, Cognitive Processes, Problem Solving, Thinking Skills, Comprehension, College Mathematics, College Students, Foreign Countries |
| Geographic Terms: | Indonesia |
| ISSN: | 2573-4377 |
| Abstract: | This study aims to describe metacognitive interventions for students who experience suspension of sense-making when solving integration problems based on the characteristics of students' thinking. This research applied a qualitative research approach and provided essay tests followed by task-based interviews to classify students who experience suspension of sense-making into two categories based on their thinking characteristics namely pure procedural and mixed conceptual-procedural. The metacognitive intervention in this study was carried out by giving metacognitive questions to the participants based on their thinking characteristics. The metacognitive questions given included comprehension, connection, strategy, and reflection questions. The results of this study indicated that mixed conceptual-procedural students were able to raise their sense-making earlier than pure procedural students. It can be concluded that pure procedural students need metacognitive intervention in the form of complete metacognitive intervention while mixed conceptual-procedural students only need partial metacognitive intervention. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2023 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1391470 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1391470 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1391470 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Metacognitive Intervention: Can It Solve Suspension of Sense-Making in Integration Problem-Solving? – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Alifiani%22">Alifiani</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Subanji%22">Subanji</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Permadi%2C+Hendro%22">Permadi, Hendro</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Irawati%2C+Santi%22">Irawati, Santi</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Mathematics+Teaching+Research+Journal%22"><i>Mathematics Teaching Research Journal</i></searchLink>. Spr 2023 15(1):44-66. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: City University of New York. Creative Commons. 205 East 42 Street, New York, NY 10017. Web site: https://commons.hostos.cuny.edu/mtrj – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 23 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2023 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Metacognition%22">Metacognition</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Intervention%22">Intervention</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Concept+Formation%22">Concept Formation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognitive+Processes%22">Cognitive Processes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Problem+Solving%22">Problem Solving</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Thinking+Skills%22">Thinking Skills</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Comprehension%22">Comprehension</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Mathematics%22">College Mathematics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Students%22">College Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Indonesia%22">Indonesia</searchLink> – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 2573-4377 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This study aims to describe metacognitive interventions for students who experience suspension of sense-making when solving integration problems based on the characteristics of students' thinking. This research applied a qualitative research approach and provided essay tests followed by task-based interviews to classify students who experience suspension of sense-making into two categories based on their thinking characteristics namely pure procedural and mixed conceptual-procedural. The metacognitive intervention in this study was carried out by giving metacognitive questions to the participants based on their thinking characteristics. The metacognitive questions given included comprehension, connection, strategy, and reflection questions. The results of this study indicated that mixed conceptual-procedural students were able to raise their sense-making earlier than pure procedural students. It can be concluded that pure procedural students need metacognitive intervention in the form of complete metacognitive intervention while mixed conceptual-procedural students only need partial metacognitive intervention. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2023 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1391470 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1391470 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 23 StartPage: 44 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Metacognition Type: general – SubjectFull: Intervention Type: general – SubjectFull: Concept Formation Type: general – SubjectFull: Cognitive Processes Type: general – SubjectFull: Problem Solving Type: general – SubjectFull: Thinking Skills Type: general – SubjectFull: Comprehension Type: general – SubjectFull: College Mathematics Type: general – SubjectFull: College Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries Type: general – SubjectFull: Indonesia Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Metacognitive Intervention: Can It Solve Suspension of Sense-Making in Integration Problem-Solving? Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Alifiani – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Subanji – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Permadi, Hendro – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Irawati, Santi IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2023 Identifiers: – Type: issn-electronic Value: 2573-4377 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 15 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: Mathematics Teaching Research Journal Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |