A Comparison of the Efficacies of Differential Item Functioning Detection Methods
Saved in:
| Title: | A Comparison of the Efficacies of Differential Item Functioning Detection Methods |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Basman, Munevver (ORCID |
| Source: | International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education. 2023 10(1):145-159. |
| Availability: | International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education. Pamukkale University, Faculty of Education, Kinikli Campus, Denizli 20070, Turkey. e-mail: ijate.editor@gmail.com; Web site: https://ijate.net/index.php/ijate |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 15 |
| Publication Date: | 2023 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Descriptors: | Test Bias, Test Items, Test Validity, Item Response Theory, Test Theory, Test Length, Sample Size, Monte Carlo Methods, Error Patterns |
| ISSN: | 2148-7456 |
| Abstract: | To ensure the validity of the tests is to check that all items have similar results across different groups of individuals. However, differential item functioning (DIF) occurs when the results of individuals with equal ability levels from different groups differ from each other on the same test item. Based on Item Response Theory and Classic Test Theory, there are some methods, with different advantages and limitations to identify items that show DIF. This study aims to compare the performances of five methods for detecting DIF. The efficacies of Mantel-Haenszel (MH), Logistic Regression (LR), Crossing simultaneous item bias test (CSIBTEST), Lord's chi-square (LORD), and Raju's area measure (RAJU) methods are examined considering conditions of the sample size, DIF ratio, and test length. In this study, to compare the detection methods, power and Type I error rates are evaluated using a simulation study with 100 replications conducted for each condition. Results show that LR and MH have the lowest Type I error and the highest power rate in detecting uniform DIF. In addition, CSIBTEST has a similar power rate to MH and LR. Under DIF conditions, sample size, DIF ratio, test length and their interactions affect Type I error and power rates. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2023 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1393256 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1393256 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1393256 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: A Comparison of the Efficacies of Differential Item Functioning Detection Methods – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Basman%2C+Munevver%22">Basman, Munevver</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3572-7982">0000-0003-3572-7982</externalLink>) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22International+Journal+of+Assessment+Tools+in+Education%22"><i>International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education</i></searchLink>. 2023 10(1):145-159. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education. Pamukkale University, Faculty of Education, Kinikli Campus, Denizli 20070, Turkey. e-mail: ijate.editor@gmail.com; Web site: https://ijate.net/index.php/ijate – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 15 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2023 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Bias%22">Test Bias</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Items%22">Test Items</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Validity%22">Test Validity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Item+Response+Theory%22">Item Response Theory</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Theory%22">Test Theory</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Length%22">Test Length</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sample+Size%22">Sample Size</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Monte+Carlo+Methods%22">Monte Carlo Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Error+Patterns%22">Error Patterns</searchLink> – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 2148-7456 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: To ensure the validity of the tests is to check that all items have similar results across different groups of individuals. However, differential item functioning (DIF) occurs when the results of individuals with equal ability levels from different groups differ from each other on the same test item. Based on Item Response Theory and Classic Test Theory, there are some methods, with different advantages and limitations to identify items that show DIF. This study aims to compare the performances of five methods for detecting DIF. The efficacies of Mantel-Haenszel (MH), Logistic Regression (LR), Crossing simultaneous item bias test (CSIBTEST), Lord's chi-square (LORD), and Raju's area measure (RAJU) methods are examined considering conditions of the sample size, DIF ratio, and test length. In this study, to compare the detection methods, power and Type I error rates are evaluated using a simulation study with 100 replications conducted for each condition. Results show that LR and MH have the lowest Type I error and the highest power rate in detecting uniform DIF. In addition, CSIBTEST has a similar power rate to MH and LR. Under DIF conditions, sample size, DIF ratio, test length and their interactions affect Type I error and power rates. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2023 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1393256 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1393256 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 15 StartPage: 145 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Test Bias Type: general – SubjectFull: Test Items Type: general – SubjectFull: Test Validity Type: general – SubjectFull: Item Response Theory Type: general – SubjectFull: Test Theory Type: general – SubjectFull: Test Length Type: general – SubjectFull: Sample Size Type: general – SubjectFull: Monte Carlo Methods Type: general – SubjectFull: Error Patterns Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: A Comparison of the Efficacies of Differential Item Functioning Detection Methods Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Basman, Munevver IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2023 Identifiers: – Type: issn-electronic Value: 2148-7456 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 10 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |