Using Auxiliary Data to Boost Precision in the Analysis of A/B Tests on an Online Educational Platform: New Data and New Results
Saved in:
| Title: | Using Auxiliary Data to Boost Precision in the Analysis of A/B Tests on an Online Educational Platform: New Data and New Results |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Sales, Adam C. (ORCID |
| Source: | Journal of Educational Data Mining. 2023 15(2):53-85. |
| Availability: | International Educational Data Mining. e-mail: jedm.editor@gmail.com; Web site: https://jedm.educationaldatamining.org/index.php/JEDM |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 33 |
| Publication Date: | 2023 |
| Sponsoring Agency: | Institute of Education Sciences (ED) |
| Contract Number: | R305D210031 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Descriptors: | Data Use, Research Methodology, Randomized Controlled Trials, Educational Technology, Electronic Learning, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Sample Size, Data Collection, Privacy, Accuracy, Statistical Bias, Prediction |
| ISSN: | 2157-2100 |
| Abstract: | Randomized A/B tests within online learning platforms represent an exciting direction in learning sciences. With minimal assumptions, they allow causal effect estimation without confounding bias and exact statistical inference even in small samples. However, often experimental samples and/or treatment effects are small, A/B tests are underpowered, and effect estimates are overly imprecise. Recent methodological advances have shown that power and statistical precision can be substantially boosted by coupling design-based causal estimation to machine-learning models of rich log data from historical users who were not in the experiment. Estimates using these techniques remain unbiased and inference remains exact without any additional assumptions. This paper reviews those methods and applies them to a new dataset including over 250 randomized A/B comparisons conducted within ASSISTments, an online learning platform. We compare results across experiments using four novel deep-learning models of auxiliary data and show that incorporating auxiliary data into causal estimates is roughly equivalent to increasing the sample size by 20% on average, or as much as 50-80% in some cases, relative to t-tests, and by about 10% on average, or as much as 30-50%, compared to cutting-edge machine learning unbiased estimates that use only data from the experiments. We show that the gains can be even larger for estimating subgroup effects, hold even when the remnant is unrepresentative of the A/B test sample, and extend to post-stratification population effects estimators. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| IES Funded: | Yes |
| Entry Date: | 2023 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1396226 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1396226 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1396226 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Using Auxiliary Data to Boost Precision in the Analysis of A/B Tests on an Online Educational Platform: New Data and New Results – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sales%2C+Adam+C%2E%22">Sales, Adam C.</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0416-0610">0000-0003-0416-0610</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Prihar%2C+Ethan+B%2E%22">Prihar, Ethan B.</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5216-9815">0000-0002-5216-9815</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gagnon-Bartsch%2C+Johann+A%2E%22">Gagnon-Bartsch, Johann A.</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7683-2434">0000-0001-7683-2434</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Heffernan%2C+Neil+T%2E%22">Heffernan, Neil T.</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3280-288X">0000-0002-3280-288X</externalLink>) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Journal+of+Educational+Data+Mining%22"><i>Journal of Educational Data Mining</i></searchLink>. 2023 15(2):53-85. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: International Educational Data Mining. e-mail: jedm.editor@gmail.com; Web site: https://jedm.educationaldatamining.org/index.php/JEDM – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 33 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2023 – Name: SourceSuprt Label: Sponsoring Agency Group: SrcSuprt Data: Institute of Education Sciences (ED) – Name: NumberContract Label: Contract Number Group: NumCntrct Data: R305D210031 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+Use%22">Data Use</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+Methodology%22">Research Methodology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Randomized+Controlled+Trials%22">Randomized Controlled Trials</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Technology%22">Educational Technology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Electronic+Learning%22">Electronic Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Intelligent+Tutoring+Systems%22">Intelligent Tutoring Systems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sample+Size%22">Sample Size</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+Collection%22">Data Collection</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Privacy%22">Privacy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Accuracy%22">Accuracy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Statistical+Bias%22">Statistical Bias</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Prediction%22">Prediction</searchLink> – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 2157-2100 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Randomized A/B tests within online learning platforms represent an exciting direction in learning sciences. With minimal assumptions, they allow causal effect estimation without confounding bias and exact statistical inference even in small samples. However, often experimental samples and/or treatment effects are small, A/B tests are underpowered, and effect estimates are overly imprecise. Recent methodological advances have shown that power and statistical precision can be substantially boosted by coupling design-based causal estimation to machine-learning models of rich log data from historical users who were not in the experiment. Estimates using these techniques remain unbiased and inference remains exact without any additional assumptions. This paper reviews those methods and applies them to a new dataset including over 250 randomized A/B comparisons conducted within ASSISTments, an online learning platform. We compare results across experiments using four novel deep-learning models of auxiliary data and show that incorporating auxiliary data into causal estimates is roughly equivalent to increasing the sample size by 20% on average, or as much as 50-80% in some cases, relative to t-tests, and by about 10% on average, or as much as 30-50%, compared to cutting-edge machine learning unbiased estimates that use only data from the experiments. We show that the gains can be even larger for estimating subgroup effects, hold even when the remnant is unrepresentative of the A/B test sample, and extend to post-stratification population effects estimators. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: CodeSource Label: IES Funded Group: SrcInfo Data: Yes – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2023 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1396226 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1396226 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 33 StartPage: 53 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Data Use Type: general – SubjectFull: Research Methodology Type: general – SubjectFull: Randomized Controlled Trials Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Technology Type: general – SubjectFull: Electronic Learning Type: general – SubjectFull: Intelligent Tutoring Systems Type: general – SubjectFull: Sample Size Type: general – SubjectFull: Data Collection Type: general – SubjectFull: Privacy Type: general – SubjectFull: Accuracy Type: general – SubjectFull: Statistical Bias Type: general – SubjectFull: Prediction Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Using Auxiliary Data to Boost Precision in the Analysis of A/B Tests on an Online Educational Platform: New Data and New Results Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Sales, Adam C. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Prihar, Ethan B. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Gagnon-Bartsch, Johann A. – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Heffernan, Neil T. IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2023 Identifiers: – Type: issn-electronic Value: 2157-2100 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 15 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Educational Data Mining Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |