How to Support Co-Creation in Higher Education: The Validation of a Questionnaire
Saved in:
| Title: | How to Support Co-Creation in Higher Education: The Validation of a Questionnaire |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Miranda de Hei, Inge Audenaerde |
| Source: | Higher Education Studies. 2023 13(3):54-68. |
| Availability: | Canadian Center of Science and Education. 1595 Sixteenth Ave Suite 301, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3N9 Canada. Tel: 416-642-2606; Fax: 416-642-2608; e-mail: hes@ccsenet.org; Web site: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/hes |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 15 |
| Publication Date: | 2023 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Higher Education, Partnerships in Education, Cooperative Learning, Questionnaires, Test Validity, Factor Analysis, Accountability, Educational Methods, Group Dynamics, Creativity, Educational Objectives, Program Evaluation, Reflection |
| ISSN: | 1925-4741 1925-475X |
| Abstract: | In this study, we regard co-creation as a collaborative process where students, lecturers and working field professionals from outside the university jointly develop innovative products, processes or knowledge. In co-creation all stakeholders equally contribute to the collaborative process and aim to create beneficial outcomes for each participant. Co-creation can be used as a valuable pedagogical method to support continuous interaction between learning and working in higher education to foster innovation. However, this process is not necessarily mastered by co-creation groups. In order to identify which components of this collaboration process can be further improved, we developed a questionnaire to assess co-creation processes in higher education. Students, lecturers and working field professionals participating in co-creation projects completed the questionnaire. We validated the questionnaire using a principal component analysis. The seven extracted scales proved to be sufficiently reliable. The final questionnaire consists of seven components: positive interdependence, individual accountability, collaboration, shared mental models, safe and supporting conditions, creative community, and group evaluation. We described how the tool can be used in practice. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2023 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1403496 |
| Database: | ERIC |
Be the first to leave a comment!
