View in EDS HTML Full Text PDF Full Text

The Affirmed (White) Teacher in a Cross-Race Context

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The Affirmed (White) Teacher in a Cross-Race Context
Language: English
Authors: Shannon T. Brady (ORCID 0000-0003-3975-3301), Camilla Mutoni Griffiths (ORCID 0000-0002-7300-5553), Geoffrey L. Cohen
Source: Social Psychology of Education: An International Journal. 2024 27(1):47-68.
Availability: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 22
Publication Date: 2024
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Racial Relations, White Teachers, Values Clarification, Values Education, Stress Management, Public School Teachers, Minority Group Students, Beginning Teachers, Well Being, Teacher Student Relationship, Individual Development, Teacher Education Programs
DOI: 10.1007/s11218-023-09812-z
ISSN: 1381-2890
1573-1928
Abstract: Within psychology, efforts to address racial-ethnic disparities in students' academic outcomes have focused primarily on students themselves. But there is another important person in classrooms: the teacher. In the United States, most racial-ethnically minoritized students are taught by White teachers. Drawing on research on cross-race interactions, we argue that for White teachers--especially those new to the profession--this dynamic is likely to elicit psychological threat, which then undermines their relationships with students, their well-being, and their effectiveness as an instructor. We hypothesized that values affirmation, a technique to mitigate threat and stress, could improve these outcomes. We randomly assigned White public school teachers (N = 109) at schools serving predominantly minoritized students to complete a values affirmation exercise or a matched control exercise in the fall of their first year of teaching. Five months later, affirmed teachers reported greater well-being and better teacher-student relationships than their control counterparts, and their classrooms were rated as more rigorous and more supportive of students' academic growth by trained observers.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2024
Accession Number: EJ1408446
Database: ERIC
Full text is not displayed to guests.
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
    Url: https://content.ebscohost.com/cds/retrieve?content=AQICAHj0k_4E0hTGH8RJwT4gCJyBsGNe_WN95AvKlDbXJGqwxwGlYrA90SB-1ChqteWw4-KyAAAA4zCB4AYJKoZIhvcNAQcGoIHSMIHPAgEAMIHJBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHgYJYIZIAWUDBAEuMBEEDCEWE_XJa4MkN9xSXgIBEICBmyCVCt5AY4sMNGpInKFyKIVwjeyqN05pGQ4nL3jQ2QuWSyIYLqwKMzIXX_oGaS69DOtzEsW3OdNkAJ6Uq3pby_kV6H_BO_2H8I0iAdVkjxGae5hfxQPU3jynx0xgvrf_WKA07VRk8vmpEh-MgVb-3pjXWFQNvuPherZLskz9-Mblmi_pIMyT0t5ejXejRQPhNFty7FP00NsFO9T9
Text:
  Availability: 1
  Value: <anid>AN0174953490;luo01feb.24;2024Jan24.05:23;v2.2.500</anid> <title id="AN0174953490-1">The affirmed (White) teacher in a cross-race context </title> <p>Within psychology, efforts to address racial-ethnic disparities in students' academic outcomes have focused primarily on students themselves. But there is another important person in classrooms: the teacher. In the United States, most racial-ethnically minoritized students are taught by White teachers. Drawing on research on cross-race interactions, we argue that for White teachers—especially those new to the profession—this dynamic is likely to elicit psychological threat, which then undermines their relationships with students, their well-being, and their effectiveness as an instructor. We hypothesized that values affirmation, a technique to mitigate threat and stress, could improve these outcomes. We randomly assigned White public school teachers (N = 109) at schools serving predominantly minoritized students to complete a values affirmation exercise or a matched control exercise in the fall of their first year of teaching. Five months later, affirmed teachers reported greater well-being and better teacher–student relationships than their control counterparts, and their classrooms were rated as more rigorous and more supportive of students' academic growth by trained observers.</p> <p>Keywords: Cross-race interactions; Teacher stress and well-being; Psychological threat; Social-psychological intervention; Values affirmation; Teacher–student relationship</p> <p>Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-023-09812-z.</p> <p>"Not only do I look different than my little scholars, but I am often naive, and I fear insensitive, to the areas in which our cultural values and norms differ. I fear our small differences are creating an even greater barrier between us."-White first-year elementary school teacher (Anonymous, [<reflink idref="bib2" id="ref1">2</reflink>])</p> <hd id="AN0174953490-2">Introduction</hd> <p>Racial-ethnic disparities in academic outcomes in the United States are pervasive and persistent. On average, White students perform better academically than their Black, Latinx, and Native counterparts (hereafter, "minoritized"[<reflink idref="bib1" id="ref2">1</reflink>]) and are less likely to experience school discipline (de Brey et al., [<reflink idref="bib18" id="ref3">18</reflink>]; Pearman et al., [<reflink idref="bib40" id="ref4">40</reflink>]). These disparities emerge early and persist throughout students' schooling. Addressing this issue is pressing, as an increasing majority of primary and secondary public school students are now non-White (Hussar & Bailey, [<reflink idref="bib28" id="ref5">28</reflink>]).</p> <p>Structural factors rooted in racism and oppression, such as housing segregation and approaches to school funding, contribute to these disparities (Carter & Welner, [<reflink idref="bib7" id="ref6">7</reflink>]). In addition, psychological factors—informed by this structural context—also play a role. So far, most research has focused on students' psychology. For example, minoritized students can experience stereotype threat in educational environments due to an awareness that, if they perform poorly, they could confirm negative stereotypes about their group's intellectual ability (Steele, [<reflink idref="bib49" id="ref7">49</reflink>]). The added burden of this awareness is stressful and can interfere with academic performance. Encouragingly, psychological interventions to mitigate minoritized students' feelings of threat can bolster their performance and well-being, reducing disparities (e.g., Cohen et al., [<reflink idref="bib11" id="ref8">11</reflink>]).</p> <p>Growing attention is being paid to another key player in the classroom—the teacher—and how their psychology may also contribute to educational disparities (Turetsky et al., [<reflink idref="bib52" id="ref9">52</reflink>]). In general, teachers are stressed, burned out, and generally dissatisfied with their lives and jobs (Friedman, [<reflink idref="bib21" id="ref10">21</reflink>]; Kyriacou, [<reflink idref="bib32" id="ref11">32</reflink>]). A recent survey asked 5,000 K-12 teachers to describe their most frequent daily emotions; among the most common responses were <emph>frustrated, tired, stressed, and overwhelmed</emph> (Cipriano & Brackett, [<reflink idref="bib9" id="ref12">9</reflink>]).</p> <p>To understand how teachers' psychology might contribute to racial-ethnic disparities in education, it is important to understand the racial-ethnic demographics of teachers and students in the United States. The vast majority of current public school teachers in the United States identify racial-ethnically as White (approximately 80%; Taie & Lewis, [<reflink idref="bib50" id="ref13">50</reflink>]). As the percentage of non-White students in public schools grows, these teachers increasingly find themselves teaching in cross-race contexts (Ladson-Billings, [<reflink idref="bib33" id="ref14">33</reflink>]). Even in schools where most students are from minoritized backgrounds (hereafter, "majority-minoritized schools"), 70% of teachers are White (Yeager et al., [<reflink idref="bib58" id="ref15">58</reflink>]). It is these teachers on which the present research focuses.</p> <hd id="AN0174953490-3">Cross-race interactions and the classroom consequences of psychological threat</hd> <p>A robust literature documents that people tend to appraise cross-race interactions as a threat and experience stress (Trawalter et al., [<reflink idref="bib51" id="ref16">51</reflink>]). This is especially true for those unaccustomed to such interactions, as is the case for many White people, including most White teachers when they enter the profession (Frankenberg, [<reflink idref="bib20" id="ref17">20</reflink>]; see also Delpit, [<reflink idref="bib19" id="ref18">19</reflink>]). Indeed, White teachers in majority-minoritized schools report significantly lower job satisfaction than those teaching in predominantly White schools (Renzulli et al., [<reflink idref="bib43" id="ref19">43</reflink>]). Thus, for first-year White teachers at majority-minoritized schools, the already high stress of being a new teacher may be compounded by psychological threat engendered by teaching across racial lines (Cohen et al., [<reflink idref="bib13" id="ref20">13</reflink>]).</p> <p>If White first-year teachers in cross-race contexts chronically experience such psychological threat, what would the consequences be for them and their students? First, threat and stress can interfere with the formation of positive teacher–student relationships (Clunies-Ross et al., [<reflink idref="bib10" id="ref21">10</reflink>]), which are integral to student academic success (Roorda et al., [<reflink idref="bib45" id="ref22">45</reflink>]). For example, White teachers may be avoidant and distant with their minoritized students out of fear of appearing prejudiced (see Shelton & Richeson, [<reflink idref="bib46" id="ref23">46</reflink>]). Second, stress—when too severe or interpreted negatively—taxes executive function (Richeson & Trawalter, [<reflink idref="bib44" id="ref24">44</reflink>]) and impairs performance (Beilock, [<reflink idref="bib4" id="ref25">4</reflink>]). In one illustrative study, White people randomly assigned to teach a Black (versus White) learner were more anxious during the interaction and delivered lessons of poorer instructional quality (Jacoby-Senghor et al., [<reflink idref="bib29" id="ref26">29</reflink>]). Third, the challenge of giving feedback across racial lines can lead White evaluators to engage in the positive feedback bias, reducing rigor and depriving students of a critical resource for growth (Harber, [<reflink idref="bib25" id="ref27">25</reflink>]; Harber et al., [<reflink idref="bib26" id="ref28">26</reflink>]). Consistent with the idea that White teachers who are new to the profession may be particularly susceptible to reducing rigor in cross-race contexts, first-year White teachers tend to have lower expectations for Black students than Black teachers or even White teachers in their second year and beyond (Vinopal & Holt, [<reflink idref="bib53" id="ref29">53</reflink>]). Finally, feelings of threat often jeopardize a person's well-being (Steele, [<reflink idref="bib49" id="ref30">49</reflink>]). For teachers, this might manifest as greater burnout on the job, lower efficacy in the classroom, and a reduced sense of belonging at school.</p> <hd id="AN0174953490-4">Values affirmation</hd> <p>If psychological threat impedes the ability of new White teachers in majority-minoritized schools to sustain positive relationships with their students, to provide rigorous and effective instruction, and to maintain personal well-being, then alleviating threat may improve those outcomes (Steele, [<reflink idref="bib48" id="ref31">48</reflink>]). Values affirmation—a technique to provide people with the opportunity to reflect on their most important values, such as family, friendship, or religion—is one exercise that has been shown repeatedly to lessen feelings of threat stemming from a wide variety of sources (Cohen & Sherman, [<reflink idref="bib12" id="ref32">12</reflink>]). In standard values affirmation procedures, people identify their most important values from a list and then write about why those values are important to them. Doing so bolsters a sense of personal adequacy or "self-integrity" by broadening their perceived sources of self-worth beyond the immediately threatening situation (Critcher & Dunning, [<reflink idref="bib17" id="ref33">17</reflink>]).</p> <p>By alleviating threat, values affirmation can improve people's well-being and coping (Brady et al., [<reflink idref="bib6" id="ref34">6</reflink>]), enhance their problem-solving under stress (Creswell et al., [<reflink idref="bib16" id="ref35">16</reflink>]) and reduce the positive feedback bias (Harber et al., [<reflink idref="bib26" id="ref36">26</reflink>]; for a review, see Cohen & Sherman, [<reflink idref="bib12" id="ref37">12</reflink>]). Consistent with the aforementioned focus on students' psychology, most existing values affirmation studies have focused on students as the experiencers of threat. For example, studies have shown that minoritized students who complete values affirmation exercises often have greater subsequent achievement and belonging than their control counterparts (Brady et al., [<reflink idref="bib6" id="ref38">6</reflink>]; Cohen et al., [<reflink idref="bib11" id="ref39">11</reflink>]) and that the magnitude of these effects is larger in "high threat" contexts (Hanselman et al., [<reflink idref="bib24" id="ref40">24</reflink>]; Wu et al., [<reflink idref="bib57" id="ref41">57</reflink>]). To date, only one affirmation study has focused on teachers. A small pilot field study (<emph>N</emph> = 42) found that affirmed teachers reported less anxiety, greater positive emotions, and more adaptive emotion regulation than their control counterparts, with effects lasting up to 2 weeks (Morgan & Atkin, [<reflink idref="bib37" id="ref42">37</reflink>]).</p> <p>Although values affirmation exercises are brief (approximately 15 minutes) they can set in motion recursive processes, wherein initial benefits beget further benefits, yielding effects that last months or even years (Cohen et al., [<reflink idref="bib11" id="ref43">11</reflink>]; Walton & Wilson, [<reflink idref="bib55" id="ref44">55</reflink>]). The opportunity for small effects to compound is large in a relationship of mutually reciprocal influence such as the teacher–student relationship (Okonofua et al., [<reflink idref="bib39" id="ref45">39</reflink>]). In the case of students, affirmation benefits have been observed more than 7 years post-intervention (Goyer et al., [<reflink idref="bib23" id="ref46">23</reflink>]).</p> <p>In the case of teachers, one can imagine how small initial effects might concatenate and persist over time. For example, a teacher who has just completed a values affirmation should be less encumbered by psychological threat. They may be less anxious and cognitively taxed and, thus, more effective at responding to classroom challenges. They may set higher expectations for students and provide critical feedback. They may, generally, act in ways that bolster instructional quality and encourage positive teacher–student relationships. Over time, students may come to trust the teacher more (cf. Cohen et al., [<reflink idref="bib13" id="ref47">13</reflink>]) and learn more. Seeing students respond positively, the teacher may feel greater affinity for them, believe more strongly in their ability to learn, and engage with them still further, in a cycle that increasingly manifests their potential (Cohen & Sherman, [<reflink idref="bib12" id="ref48">12</reflink>]; Purdie-Vaughns et al., [<reflink idref="bib42" id="ref49">42</reflink>]). In this way, a timely intervention can set in motion a process that yields lasting benefits.</p> <hd id="AN0174953490-5">The present study</hd> <p>The present study examined whether an affirmation delivered to White first-year teachers in majority-minoritized schools could improve their outcomes and the outcomes of their students. To include teachers from different grade levels, schools, and subject areas, we worked with Teach For America (TFA); an alternative teacher certification and training organization that regularly evaluates its first-year teachers using standardized rubrics. In the fall of their first year of teaching, teachers from two sequential cohorts completed either a values affirmation exercise or an active control exercise, randomly assigned at the individual level.</p> <p>We offered teachers these exercises shortly before the Thanksgiving or winter holiday breaks—a time in teachers' first year that has been identified as particularly stressful (Kinnunen & Leskinen, [<reflink idref="bib30" id="ref50">30</reflink>]). We did so based on the belief that this would offer the greatest chance of initiating a positive recursive process. If the affirmation boosted teachers' feelings of adequacy, even modestly, at this time of high stress toward the beginning of the school year (cf. Cook et al., [<reflink idref="bib15" id="ref51">15</reflink>]), it might help them take advantage of the subsequent break to improve their teaching, such as by reflecting on their practice, preparing lessons, or planning how to connect better with students. These actions could then lead to improved teacher–student interactions or lessons, setting the teacher and their class on a positive trajectory.</p> <p>We expected that, if affirmation alleviated teachers' feelings of psychological threat, affirmed teachers would report better relationships with their students and that their students would be more engaged in their learning and more likely to make substantial academic progress. These outcomes measures were assessed directly by TFA. With the second cohort of teachers, we were able to conduct an additional survey designed by the research team, in order to assess additional outcomes. This enabled us to assess whether the affirmation reduced teachers' worries about racial dynamics of interactions at school and improved their well-being. Further, it enabled us to examine how affirmation might change their attributions for student challenges.</p> <hd id="AN0174953490-6">Method</hd> <p></p> <hd id="AN0174953490-7">Participants</hd> <p>Participants were teachers affiliated with the Teach For America (TFA) program. TFA is a non-profit organization that recruits college graduates to teach in under-resourced public schools in several regions of the United States. TFA selects, trains, and works to find the teachers in its program positions in partner school districts. Once hired by a school district, a teacher affiliated with TFA becomes a regular full-time, salaried employee of the district. When a person joins TFA, they commit to teaching for at least 2 years.</p> <p>To maximize statistical power, we focused specifically on teachers who, as a group, we expected to be most likely to experience feelings of threat from teaching in a cross-race context: teachers in their first year of teaching who identified their racial-ethnic background as White. In each of 2 years, first-year teachers in the Oklahoma region of TFA were invited to participate. Teachers who (a) provided consent via an online survey, (b) started experimental materials, (c) and identified their racial-ethnic background as White, either to TFA or to the research team, are included in the present analyses. Although we originally intended to include only secondary teachers, we include all teachers who met the inclusion criteria regardless of grade level in order to maximize sample size. (As noted in the Supplemental Material, grade level does not moderate results.)</p> <p>One hundred nine teachers met the inclusion criteria (<emph>n</emph><subs><emph>control</emph></subs> = 53, <emph>n</emph><subs><emph>affirmation</emph></subs> = 56). Of these, 69% were female. About half (51%) taught in elementary schools or early childhood programs, and half (49%) taught in secondary schools. All taught in low-income, majority-minoritized schools; the percentage of minoritized students in participating teachers' schools ranged from 51.8 to 95.9%. On average, the racial-ethnic composition of students in teachers' schools was 1.3% Asian or Asian American, 31.5% Black or African American, 42.6% Latinx or Hispanic, 4.7% Native or Indigenous, 15.2% White, and 4.4% multiracial. Across schools, the percentage of students eligible for free or reduced price lunch, a proxy for low-income status, was 94%; it ranged from 83.2 to 100%. Teacher and school characteristics were similar across the two cohorts. See Table 1.</p> <p>Table 1 Teacher and school characteristics by cohort</p> <p> <ephtml> <table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th align="left" rowspan="2"><p>Teacher characteristics</p></th><th align="left" colspan="2"><p>Percent or mean (<italic>SD</italic>)</p></th></tr><tr><th align="left"><p>Cohort 1</p><p><italic>N</italic> = 74</p></th><th align="left"><p>Cohort 2</p><p><italic>N</italic> = 35</p></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" colspan="3"><p><italic>Demographics</italic></p></td></tr><tr><td align="left"><p>% White</p></td><td align="left"><p>100%</p></td><td align="left"><p>100%</p></td></tr><tr><td align="left"><p>% Female</p></td><td align="left"><p>69%</p></td><td align="left"><p>69%</p></td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="3"><p><italic>Teacher grade level</italic></p></td></tr><tr><td align="left"><p>% Elementary</p></td><td align="left"><p>50%</p></td><td align="left"><p>54%</p></td></tr><tr><td align="left"><p>% Middle School</p></td><td align="left"><p>31%</p></td><td align="left"><p>32%</p></td></tr><tr><td align="left"><p>% High School</p></td><td align="left"><p>19%</p></td><td align="left"><p>14%</p></td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="3"><p><italic>Teacher content area</italic></p></td></tr><tr><td align="left"><p>% English/Language Arts</p></td><td align="left"><p>19%</p></td><td align="left"><p>12%</p></td></tr><tr><td align="left"><p>% Math</p></td><td align="left"><p>16%</p></td><td align="left"><p>17%</p></td></tr><tr><td align="left"><p>% Science</p></td><td align="left"><p>12%</p></td><td align="left"><p>14%</p></td></tr><tr><td align="left"><p>% Social Studies</p></td><td align="left"><p>3%</p></td><td align="left"><p>3%</p></td></tr><tr><td align="left"><p>% Multi-Subject</p></td><td align="left"><p>50%</p></td><td align="left"><p>54%</p></td></tr></tbody></table> </ephtml> </p> <p>Table 1 Teacher and school characteristics by cohort</p> <p> <ephtml> <table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th align="left"><p>School characteristics (average by teacher)</p></th><th align="left"><p>Cohort 1</p></th><th align="left"><p>Cohort 2</p></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left"><p>% Students: Minoritized (Black, Latinx, Native)</p></td><td align="left"><p>80%</p><p>(12%)</p></td><td align="left"><p>79%</p><p>(11%)</p></td></tr><tr><td align="left"><p>% Students: Free or Reduced Price Lunch</p></td><td align="left"><p>94%</p><p>(5%)</p></td><td align="left"><p>93%</p><p>(5%)</p></td></tr><tr><td align="left"><p>% Students: English Language Learners</p></td><td align="left"><p>28%</p><p>(18%)</p></td><td align="left"><p>27%</p><p>(21%)</p></td></tr><tr><td align="left"><p>Performance Rating (on 100 scale; higher numbers indicate better performance)</p></td><td align="left"><p>55</p><p>(13)</p></td><td align="left"><p>52</p><p>(11)</p></td></tr></tbody></table> </ephtml> </p> <p> <emph>Note.</emph> Data from four schools are omitted because reliable information about the variables of interest could not be obtained. The omitted schools include one middle school and one high school that closed within a year of the study's conclusion and two early childhood centers</p> <hd id="AN0174953490-8">Procedure</hd> <p>Figure 1 depicts the study timeline. As discussed below, the intervention occurred in late fall of teachers' first year of teaching and data collection occurred in late spring of that same academic year.</p> <p>Graph: Fig. 1Study Timeline During Participants' First Year of Teaching. Note. C, Cohort; TFA, Teach For America, a non-profit teacher recruitment and training organization with which participating teachers were affiliated. a Administered by TFA. b Administered by the research team</p> <hd id="AN0174953490-9">Consent</hd> <p>In October (Cohort 1) or November (Cohort 2) of their first year of teaching, teachers received an email from the research team inviting them to participate in a study concerning "first year teacher experiences." Interested teachers were directed to an online consent form. Teachers who did not complete the consent form at this time but who subsequently completed the experimental manipulation were given another opportunity to consent at the end of their first or second year of teaching. As part of the consent form, teachers agreed to allow TFA to share data with the research team.</p> <hd id="AN0174953490-10">Intervention</hd> <p>A few weeks after the study invitation and collection of consent, teachers received an ostensibly unrelated email from a TFA staff member. The email explained that TFA was partnering with outside consultants to learn more about how teachers think about values and requested that teachers complete a brief reflection about their values. Teachers were directed via a link in the email to an online survey. This constituted the experimental values affirmation intervention, described below. TFA staff members were blind to condition assignments and specific hypotheses.</p> <p>Although the values reflection was presented as coming from TFA and thus connected to participants' identities as teachers, it was structured to encourage teachers to write about values <emph>unrelated</emph> to school. Writing about values unrelated to the domain of threat is theorized to help the affirmation broaden the self beyond the domain of threat (Cohen & Sherman, [<reflink idref="bib12" id="ref52">12</reflink>]).</p> <hd id="AN0174953490-11">Mentor evaluations</hd> <p>Over the course of the year, each teacher was mentored by one of 16 trained "managers of teacher learning and development" (hereafter, "mentors") who were full-time employees of TFA. This mentor observed the teacher's classroom and provided instructional coaching. Additionally, the mentor rated the teacher's classroom on several dimensions using a standardized rubric; these were TFA's de facto measures of teacher quality. All of the mentors received the same extensive training on how to reliably conduct classroom observations and use the rubric. Throughout the year, the mentors met with one another to ensure that the rubric was applied consistently across classrooms. For each participant, we obtained their mentor's end-of-year ratings of student engagement with rigorous content and student academic growth, assessed in April or May. All mentors except one were blind to the study hypotheses and all were blind to teachers' condition assignments.</p> <hd id="AN0174953490-12">End-of-year survey</hd> <p>For Cohort 1, TFA administered a survey to the teachers at the end of their first year of teaching. The survey included questions about teachers' relationships with their students as well as other measures of interest to TFA.</p> <p>For Cohort 2, we were able to administer our own, more extensive survey at the end of participants' first year of teaching. The survey assessed teachers' relationships with their students, their well-being, and other aspects of their teaching experience. Teachers received a $10 gift card for completing this survey.</p> <hd id="AN0174953490-13">Experimental materials: values affirmation intervention</hd> <p>Participants completed standard values affirmation or control materials (see Supplemental Material). In the affirmation condition, teachers identified 2–3 values <emph>most</emph> important to them from a list of 12 values (e.g., relationships with friends and family, sense of humor, creativity) and then wrote about why those values were important to them. In the control condition, teachers were presented with the same list of 12 values. They identified 2–3 values <emph>least</emph> important to them and wrote about why those values might be important to someone else other than a student.</p> <p>For Cohort 1, both affirmation and control teachers were offered a second opportunity to reflect on values approximately 4 months after the intervention (see Figure S1). These "booster" exercises retained teachers' original condition assignments: affirmation teachers again wrote about their own values and control teachers again wrote about other people's values. Participation in the booster was high and did not vary by condition (83% in each condition). Due to power limitations and the fact that completion of the booster was not randomized, we do not separately analyze the effects of the booster. We provide examples of affirmation and control responses in the Supplemental Material.</p> <hd id="AN0174953490-14">Measures</hd> <p></p> <hd id="AN0174953490-15">Positive relationships with students</hd> <p>Our key self-report measure was the quality of teachers' relationships with their students. The outcome was assessed by TFA for Cohort 1 and by the research team for Cohort 2.[<reflink idref="bib2" id="ref53">2</reflink>] For Cohort 1, the measure consisted of two items (2 items: "I am successful at building relationships with students" and "I am successful at creating a classroom culture and environment where all students feel safe, valued, welcomed, and comfortable taking risks"; scale: 1 = <emph>strongly disagree</emph>, 7 = <emph>strongly agree</emph>; <ephtml> <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mi>α</mi></math> </ephtml> = 0.92). For Cohort 2, the measure consisted of four items (4 items: "I have a good relationship with my students," "I feel comfortable interacting with my students," "My students have a positive opinion of me," and "My students respect me"; scale: 1 = <emph>not at all true for me</emph>, 5 = <emph>extremely true for me</emph>; <ephtml> <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mi>α</mi></math> </ephtml> = 0.90). The resulting composite for each cohort was standardized to equate their means and variances, and the data were combined across cohorts.</p> <hd id="AN0174953490-16">Mentor-evaluated outcomes</hd> <p>We focused on two outcomes, student engagement with rigorous content and student academic growth, which we would expect to be affected by teachers' level of psychological threat (e.g., Harber et al., [<reflink idref="bib26" id="ref54">26</reflink>]; Jacoby-Senghor et al., [<reflink idref="bib29" id="ref55">29</reflink>]). As noted above, mentor teachers evaluated these outcomes using standardized rubrics developed by TFA.</p> <p>Mentor teachers rated students' engagement with rigorous content using a five-point scale informed by Bloom's classic taxonomy (Bloom et al., [<reflink idref="bib5" id="ref56">5</reflink>]) of the complexity of student learning objectives (<emph>To what extent are students engaging deeply with content and skills needed for success in this course & beyond? Students' academic engagement in the classroom is primarily: </emph>1 = <emph>no academic activities are occurring</emph>, 2 = <emph>academic activities are passive or confusing</emph>, 3 = <emph>academic work requires memorization or recall,</emph> 4 = <emph>academic work requires analysis or explanation</emph>, 5 = <emph>academic work requires evaluation or synthesis</emph>).</p> <p>Mentor teachers also rated the extent to which the classrooms were likely to foster students' academic growth using a five-point scale (<emph>This year students in this class are likely to make</emph>: 1 = <emph>no or limited academic growth</emph>, 2 = <emph>typical academic growth</emph>, 3 = <emph>more than typical academic growth</emph>, 4 = <emph>dramatic academic growth</emph>, 5 = <emph>dramatic and likely enduring academic growth</emph>).</p> <hd id="AN0174953490-17">Additional outcomes in Cohort 2</hd> <p> <bold>Stereotype worries.</bold> In order to explore whether the affirmation specifically reduced worries related to cross-race interactions, teachers in Cohort 2 completed a measure of stereotype worries developed by the research team. The measure assessed the extent to which teachers felt concerned about appearing prejudiced or that their students would negatively evaluate them based on their race (4 items, e.g., "At school, I worry about making race-, class-, or culture-based missteps", scale: 1 = <emph>not at all true for me,</emph> 5 = <emph>extremely true for me</emph>, <ephtml> <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mi>α</mi></math> </ephtml> = 0.80).</p> <p> <bold>Teacher well-being.</bold> In the spring, approximately five and a half months after the affirmation intervention, teachers in Cohort 2 were asked to complete five scales assessing various aspects of their general and school-related well-being, all assessed on 5- or 7-point scales. These included belonging (3 items adapted from Walton & Cohen, [<reflink idref="bib54" id="ref57">54</reflink>]; e.g., "I feel like I belong at my school", <ephtml> <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mi>α</mi></math> </ephtml> = 0.76), belonging uncertainty (2 items adapted from Walton & Cohen, [<reflink idref="bib54" id="ref58">54</reflink>], e.g. "When something bad happens, I feel that maybe I don't belong at my school; <ephtml> <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mi>α</mi></math> </ephtml> = 0.77), perceived stress (4 items adapted from Cohen et al., [<reflink idref="bib14" id="ref59">14</reflink>]; e.g., "In the last month, how often have you felt that you were unable to control the important things in your classroom?"; <ephtml> <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mi>α</mi></math> </ephtml> = 0.92), burnout (7 face-valid items developed by the research team based on Maslach et al.'s ([<reflink idref="bib35" id="ref60">35</reflink>]) model of occupational burnout; e.g. "Sometimes I dread going to school in the morning", <ephtml> <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mi>α</mi></math> </ephtml> = 0.84), and self-integrity (3 items, adapted from Sherman et al., [<reflink idref="bib47" id="ref61">47</reflink>]; e.g., "I have the ability and skills to deal with whatever comes my way", <ephtml> <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mi>α</mi></math> </ephtml> = 0.82). These scales were correlated with each other, 0.32 < <emph>r</emph>s < 0.78 (see Table S4) and all loaded on the same factor in a principal component analysis. To create a single composite measure of teacher well-being, we reverse-scored the belonging uncertainty, burnout, and perceived stress scales, standardized the scores from all five scales, and then averaged them ( <ephtml> <math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mi>α</mi></math> </ephtml> = 0.82). See Supplemental Material, including Table S3, for more information about these scales.</p> <p> <bold>Teachers' perceptions of students.</bold> In order to explore how the affirmation might change teachers' perceptions of their students, we asked them to respond to two scenarios about challenging interactions with students and to make attributions for those challenges. In particular, we were interested in whether teachers saw student difficulties as global (i.e., likely to affect several domains of the student's life) and as stable (i.e., likely to persist across time). The teacher was asked to imagine that they were the teacher in the situation. One scenario involved a student cheating in class and the other involved a student underperforming academically. To assess how global teachers thought the behaviors would be teachers indicated how likely it would be for the students to act this way (a) in other classes, (b) in domains outside of school. To assess how stable teachers thought these behaviors would be, teachers indicated on a 5-point scale how likely it would be for the students to act this way (c) 1 month from now, (d) 1 year from now, and (e) 5 years from now (1 = <emph>not at all likely</emph>, 5 = <emph>very likely</emph>).</p> <hd id="AN0174953490-18">Results</hd> <p></p> <hd id="AN0174953490-19">Analytic approach</hd> <p>Participating teachers (<emph>N</emph> = 109) were nested within cohorts (<emph>N</emph> = 2), within schools (<emph>N</emph> = 57), and within mentor teachers <emph>(N</emph> = 16). To account for this nesting, we controlled for cohort in analyses that included data from both cohorts. (Of note, none of the effects of affirmation were moderated by cohort, <emph>p</emph>s > 0.18.) In analyses of student–teacher relationships and teacher well-being, we included school as a random effect. The sample analytic model below illustrates this, where we estimate self-reported relationships for teacher <emph>i</emph> in school <emph>j</emph>, with condition<subs>Aff</subs> as an indicator for affirmation condition (coded 1 = affirmation, else = 0) and a coefficient for cohort.</p> <p> <ephtml> <math display="block" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mrow><msub><mtext>Relationships</mtext><mi>i</mi></msub><mo>∼</mo><mi>N</mi><mrow><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>α</mi><mrow><mi>j</mi><mo stretchy="false">[</mo><mi>i</mi><mo stretchy="false">]</mo></mrow></msub><mo>+</mo><msub><mi>β</mi><mn>1</mn></msub><mfenced close=")" open="("><msub><mtext>condition</mtext><mtext>Aff</mtext></msub></mfenced><mo>+</mo><msub><mi>β</mi><mn>2</mn></msub><mfenced close=")" open="("><mtext>cohort</mtext></mfenced><mo>,</mo><msup><mi>σ</mi><mn>2</mn></msup><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow></mrow></math> </ephtml> </p> <p>Graph</p> <p> <ephtml> <math display="block" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mrow><msub><mi>α</mi><mi>j</mi></msub><mo>∼</mo><mi>N</mi><mrow><mo stretchy="false">(</mo><msub><mi>μ</mi><mrow><mi>α</mi><mi>j</mi></mrow></msub><mo>,</mo><msubsup><mi>σ</mi><mrow><mi>α</mi><mi>j</mi></mrow><mn>2</mn></msubsup><mo stretchy="false">)</mo></mrow><mo>,</mo><mspace width="0.166667em" /><mtext>for</mtext><mspace width="0.166667em" /><mtext>school</mtext><mspace width="0.166667em" /><mspace width="0.166667em" /><mi>j</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>1</mn><mo>...</mo><mi>j</mi></mrow></math> </ephtml> </p> <p>Graph</p> <p>In analyses of student growth and rigor, we included mentor (instead of school) as a random effect to account for shared variance among teachers with the same mentor. Of note, also including school as a random effect did not improve model fit, so we did not include it.</p> <p>In the models reported below, outcome variables were standardized so that beta values can be interpreted as effect sizes (Acock, [<reflink idref="bib1" id="ref62">1</reflink>]). Condition was coded such that the coefficient can be interpreted as the effect of affirmation. We used the R package lme4 to implement mixed-effects models (Bates et al., [<reflink idref="bib3" id="ref63">3</reflink>]). To calculate p-values, we used the R package lmerTest, which uses a Satterthwaite approximation test to estimate the degrees of freedom (Kuznetsova et al., [<reflink idref="bib31" id="ref64">31</reflink>]). Degrees of freedom vary because of the multi-level nature of the data and because the availability of data varied by outcome.</p> <p>That said, there was very low attrition across time. For the primary outcomes, we obtained data for more than 93% of teachers (see Table 1). For each of the outcomes assessed only in Cohort 2, we obtained data from at least 83% of Cohort 2 participants. For no outcome did the availability of data differ by condition (see Supplemental Material).</p> <hd id="AN0174953490-20">Preliminary analyses</hd> <p>There were no baseline differences by condition in teacher characteristics (i.e., gender, grade level) or school characteristics (e.g., % minoritized students, performance rating). For more information, see Table S2 of the Supplemental Material.</p> <p>Table 2 provides overall descriptive statistics for the dependent measures and the corresponding zero-order correlations. Table 3 provides these descriptive statistics by condition. For correlations among individual well-being scales, see Table S3 of the Supplemental Material.</p> <p>Table 2 Descriptive statistics and zero-order correlations for dependent measures</p> <p> <ephtml> <table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th align="left"><p>Measure</p></th><th align="left"><p><italic>N</italic></p><p>(109 total)</p></th><th align="left"><p><italic>M</italic></p><p>(<italic>SD</italic>)</p></th><th align="left"><p>1</p></th><th align="left"><p>2</p></th><th align="left"><p>3</p></th><th align="left"><p>4</p></th><th align="left"><p>5</p></th><th align="left"><p>6</p></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" colspan="9"><p><italic>Teacher self-report outcomes</italic></p></td></tr><tr><td align="left"><p>1. Positive relationships with students<sup>a</sup></p></td><td align="left"><p>102</p></td><td align="left"><p>0.00</p><p>(1.00)</p></td><td align="left"><p>–</p></td><td align="left" /><td align="left" /><td align="left" /><td align="left" /><td align="left" /></tr><tr><td align="left"><p>2. Stereotype worries</p></td><td align="left"><p>29</p></td><td align="left"><p>2.56</p><p>(0.91)</p></td><td align="left"><p>-.63***</p></td><td align="left"><p>–</p></td><td align="left" /><td align="left" /><td align="left" /><td align="left" /></tr><tr><td align="left"><p>3. Well-being (standardized)</p></td><td align="left"><p>31</p></td><td align="left"><p>0.00</p><p>(0.79)</p></td><td align="left"><p>.75***</p></td><td align="left"><p>-.70***</p></td><td align="left"><p>–</p></td><td align="left" /><td align="left" /><td align="left" /></tr><tr><td align="left"><p>4. Teacher attributions: Globality</p></td><td align="left"><p>29</p></td><td align="left"><p>3.12</p><p>(0.61)</p></td><td align="left"><p>-.02</p></td><td align="left"><p>-.13</p></td><td align="left"><p>.08</p></td><td align="left"><p>–</p></td><td align="left" /><td align="left" /></tr><tr><td align="left"><p>5. Teacher attributions: Stability</p></td><td align="left"><p>29</p></td><td align="left"><p>2.43</p><p>(0.60)</p></td><td align="left"><p>-.40*</p></td><td align="left"><p>.14</p></td><td align="left"><p>-.37<sup>†</sup></p></td><td align="left"><p>.58***</p></td><td align="left"><p>–</p></td><td align="left" /></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="9"><p><italic>Mentor-evaluated outcomes</italic></p></td></tr><tr><td align="left"><p>6. Student engagement with rigorous content<sup>a</sup></p></td><td align="left"><p>104</p></td><td align="left"><p>3.13</p><p>(0.65)</p></td><td align="left"><p>.26**</p></td><td align="left"><p>-.29</p></td><td align="left"><p>.46**</p></td><td align="left"><p>.02</p></td><td align="left"><p>-.01</p></td><td align="left"><p>–</p></td></tr><tr><td align="left"><p>7. Student academic growth<sup>a</sup></p></td><td align="left"><p>104</p></td><td align="left"><p>2.37</p><p>(0.80)</p></td><td align="left"><p>.31**</p></td><td align="left"><p>-.20</p></td><td align="left"><p>.48**</p></td><td align="left"><p>-.15</p></td><td align="left"><p>-.12</p></td><td align="left"><p>.65***</p></td></tr></tbody></table> </ephtml> </p> <p> <emph>Note.</emph> The positive relationships with students measure was standardized by cohort. Individual scales that comprise the well-being measure were standardized before the composite was created <sups>a</sups>Primary outcome assessed in both cohorts <sups>†</sups><emph>p</emph> <.10, *<emph>p</emph> <.05, **<emph>p</emph> <.01, ***<emph>p</emph> <.001</p> <p>Table 3 Descriptive statistics for dependent measures by condition</p> <p> <ephtml> <table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th align="left" rowspan="2"><p>Teacher self-report outcomes</p></th><th align="left" colspan="3"><p>Affirmation</p></th><th align="left" colspan="3"><p>Control</p></th></tr><tr><th align="left"><p><italic>N</italic></p></th><th align="left"><p><italic>M</italic></p></th><th align="left"><p><italic>SD</italic></p></th><th align="left"><p><italic>N</italic></p></th><th align="left"><p><italic>M</italic></p></th><th align="left"><p><italic>SD</italic></p></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left"><p>1. Positive relationships with students<sup>a</sup></p></td><td align="left"><p>50</p></td><td char="." align="char"><p>0.23</p></td><td char="." align="char"><p>0.67</p></td><td align="left"><p>52</p></td><td align="left"><p>-0.22</p></td><td char="." align="char"><p>1.19</p></td></tr><tr><td align="left"><p>2. Stereotype worries</p></td><td align="left"><p>15</p></td><td char="." align="char"><p>2.27</p></td><td char="." align="char"><p>0.86</p></td><td align="left"><p>14</p></td><td align="left"><p>2.88</p></td><td char="." align="char"><p>0.88</p></td></tr><tr><td align="left"><p>3A. Well-being: Perceived stress</p></td><td align="left"><p>16</p></td><td char="." align="char"><p>2.39</p></td><td char="." align="char"><p>0.75</p></td><td align="left"><p>15</p></td><td align="left"><p>2.73</p></td><td char="." align="char"><p>0.92</p></td></tr><tr><td align="left"><p>3B. Well-being: Burnout</p></td><td align="left"><p>16</p></td><td char="." align="char"><p>2.79</p></td><td char="." align="char"><p>0.53</p></td><td align="left"><p>15</p></td><td align="left"><p>3.28</p></td><td char="." align="char"><p>0.97</p></td></tr><tr><td align="left"><p>3C. Well-being: Self-integrity</p></td><td align="left"><p>16</p></td><td char="." align="char"><p>6.25</p></td><td char="." align="char"><p>0.45</p></td><td align="left"><p>15</p></td><td align="left"><p>5.58</p></td><td char="." align="char"><p>0.87</p></td></tr><tr><td align="left"><p>3D. Well-being: Belonging</p></td><td align="left"><p>16</p></td><td char="." align="char"><p>5.56</p></td><td char="." align="char"><p>1.16</p></td><td align="left"><p>15</p></td><td align="left"><p>4.47</p></td><td char="." align="char"><p>1.31</p></td></tr><tr><td align="left"><p>3E. Well-being: Belonging uncertainty</p></td><td align="left"><p>16</p></td><td char="." align="char"><p>3.88</p></td><td char="." align="char"><p>1.61</p></td><td align="left"><p>15</p></td><td align="left"><p>4.97</p></td><td char="." align="char"><p>1.25</p></td></tr><tr><td align="left"><p>4. Teacher attributions: Globality</p></td><td align="left"><p>14</p></td><td char="." align="char"><p>3.02</p></td><td char="." align="char"><p>0.54</p></td><td align="left"><p>15</p></td><td align="left"><p>3.22</p></td><td char="." align="char"><p>0.67</p></td></tr><tr><td align="left"><p>5. Teacher attributions: Stability</p></td><td align="left"><p>14</p></td><td char="." align="char"><p>2.17</p></td><td char="." align="char"><p>0.43</p></td><td align="left"><p>15</p></td><td align="left"><p>2.67</p></td><td char="." align="char"><p>0.64</p></td></tr></tbody></table> </ephtml> </p> <p>Table 3 Descriptive statistics for dependent measures by condition</p> <p> <ephtml> <table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th align="left" rowspan="2"><p>Mentor-evaluated outcomes</p></th><th align="left" colspan="3"><p>Affirmation</p></th><th align="left" colspan="3"><p>Control</p></th></tr><tr><th align="left"><p><italic>N</italic></p></th><th align="left"><p><italic>M</italic></p></th><th align="left"><p><italic>SD</italic></p></th><th align="left"><p><italic>N</italic></p></th><th align="left"><p><italic>M</italic></p></th><th align="left"><p><italic>SD</italic></p></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left"><p>6. Student engagement with rigorous content<sup>a</sup></p></td><td align="left"><p>55</p></td><td char="." align="char"><p>3.22</p></td><td char="." align="char"><p>0.57</p></td><td align="left"><p>49</p></td><td char="." align="char"><p>3.04</p></td><td char="." align="char"><p>0.73</p></td></tr><tr><td align="left"><p>7. Student academic growth<sup>a</sup></p></td><td align="left"><p>55</p></td><td char="." align="char"><p>2.49</p></td><td char="." align="char"><p>0.77</p></td><td align="left"><p>49</p></td><td char="." align="char"><p>2.22</p></td><td char="." align="char"><p>0.82</p></td></tr></tbody></table> </ephtml> </p> <p> <emph>Note.</emph> The positive relationships with students measure was standardized by cohort <sups>a</sups>Primary outcome assessed in both cohorts</p> <hd id="AN0174953490-21">Primary analyses</hd> <p>As expected, affirmed teachers reported significantly better relationships with their students than control teachers, <emph>β</emph> = 0.49<emph>, t</emph>(89.31) = 2.66<emph>, p</emph> =.01. See Fig. 2.</p> <p>Graph: Fig. 2Effect of Affirmation on Positive Relationships with Students. Note. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. * p <.05, ** p <.01</p> <p>Moreover, benefits of the affirmation manifested in classroom interactions: Mentors rated students in the classrooms of affirmed teachers as more engaged with rigorous content than their peers in the classrooms of control teachers; β = 0.36, <emph>t</emph>(94.39) = 1.96, <emph>p</emph> =.05. Mentors also rated student academic growth to be greater in the classrooms of affirmed teachers than in the classrooms of control teachers; β = 0.43, <emph>t</emph>(92.59) = 2.32, <emph>p</emph> =.02. See Fig. 3.</p> <p>Graph: Fig. 3Effect of Affirmation on Mentor-Evaluated Outcomes. Note. Higher numbers indicate greater student engagement with rigorous content and greater student academic growth. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. * p <.05</p> <hd id="AN0174953490-22">Additional analyses (Cohort 2 only)</hd> <p>There was a marginal effect such that affirmed teachers expressed less concern than control teachers about appearing prejudiced or being stereotyped at school, β = -0.61, <emph>t</emph>(<reflink idref="bib27" id="ref65">27</reflink>) =.1.88, <emph>p</emph> =.07. Although this effect was directionally consistent with our predictions, it was not statistically reliable. See Fig. 4.</p> <p>Graph: Fig. 4Effect of Affirmation on Teachers' Stereotype Worries and Well-Being (Cohort 2 Only). Note. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. †p <.10, ** p <.01</p> <p>Affirmed teachers reported significantly higher overall well-being at the end of their first year than did their control counterparts; β = 0.88, <emph>t</emph>(<reflink idref="bib28" id="ref66">28</reflink>) = 2.68<emph>, p</emph> =.01<emph>.</emph> See Fig. 4. On an exploratory basis, we examined the effect of condition on the individual well-being scales. Compared with control teachers, affirmed teachers reported greater self-integrity, β = 0.95, <emph>t</emph>(27.69) = 2.94, CI = [0.27, 1.52], <emph>p</emph> =.007, and greater belonging at school, β = 0.84, (<emph>t</emph>28.3) = 2.53, CI = [0.17, 1.47], <emph>p</emph> =.02. They also reported less belonging uncertainty at school, β = -0.72, (<emph>t</emph>29) = -2.10, CI = [-1.38, -0.05], <emph>p</emph> =.04. Although not statistically significant, affirmed teachers reported directionally lower stress, β = -0.41, <emph>t</emph>(<reflink idref="bib29" id="ref67">29</reflink>) = -1.14, CI = [-1.11, 0.29], <emph>p</emph> =.26, and lower burnout than control teachers, β = 0.61, (<emph>t</emph>29) = -1.76, CI = [-1.29, 0.07], <emph>p</emph> =.09.</p> <p>Regarding teachers' attributions for student difficulties, we found no difference by condition in teachers' assessments of globality, β = -0.38,<emph> t</emph>(22.02) = -1.05, <emph>p</emph> =.31. However, teachers did differ in their assessments of stability, collapsed across the three time points (in 1 month, in 1 year, in 5 years), β = -0.86, <emph>t</emph>(25.49) = -2.54, <emph>p</emph> =.02. Figure 5 disaggregates the three time points to show that although there was not a statistically reliable difference between control and affirmation teachers' attributions about students' behavior 1 month in the future, there were reliable differences by condition in their attributions about students' behavior 1 year and 5 years in the future. Affirmed teachers were less likely than their control counterparts to expect that a student experiencing challenges today would still experience challenges a year or more in the future.</p> <p>Graph: Fig. 5Teacher Attributions for Student Difficulties: Likelihood of Poor Performance in the Future (Cohort 2 Only). Note. Scale: 1 = not at all likely , 5 = very likely. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. ** p <.01</p> <hd id="AN0174953490-23">Discussion</hd> <p>White teachers at majority-minoritized schools who completed a values affirmation toward the beginning of their first year of teaching reported better relationships with students and greater well-being at the end of the year than those who did not. Moreover, affirmation visibly improved their students' educational experiences. More than 5 months post-intervention, trained observers witnessed greater engagement with rigorous content and greater academic growth from the students of affirmed (vs. control) teachers.</p> <p>How did affirmation trigger this long-term change? Psychological threat, on the teacher's part, can induce chronic stress and undermine positive relationships with students and teaching quality through at least three different mechanisms. First, chronic stress can impede teacher's performance by undermining well-being and depleting working memory. Second, chronic stress may put teachers on the defensive, limiting their ability to interact constructively and empathically with students. Third, stress may "leak out" and be interpreted by students as evidence of bias, diminishing their engagement and growth (Yeager et al., [<reflink idref="bib58" id="ref68">58</reflink>]). Positive changes to any of these mechanisms, even if initially modest in magnitude, could concatenate over time in the classroom ecosystem, yielding meaningful benefits for the teacher and their students. Though further research in a larger sample is needed to test mediation, we find evidence consistent with the first two mechanisms. Teachers experienced less burnout and felt more confident in their belonging when affirmed and, ultimately, they fostered more educational classrooms. They also made sense of student difficulty differently. Compared to control teachers, they were more optimistic about the futures of students who were struggling in the present. Research could profitably examine the third mechanism by assessing students' perceptions of their teachers. Relatedly, the strong correlation between teachers' self-reported race-related worries and their positive relationships with students, as well as the marginal effect of affirmation on these worries, begs further investigation into White teachers' racial anxieties.</p> <hd id="AN0174953490-24">Contributions</hd> <p>This research extends past work in three key ways. First, it shows the promise for brief, interventions (Walton & Wilson, [<reflink idref="bib55" id="ref69">55</reflink>]) which target specific social-psychological processes to improve teachers' performance and well-being (see also Okonofua et al., [<reflink idref="bib39" id="ref70">39</reflink>], [<reflink idref="bib38" id="ref71">38</reflink>]). As noted earlier, only a single previous study has examined values affirmation among teachers (Morgan & Atkin, [<reflink idref="bib37" id="ref72">37</reflink>]). The present study more than doubles the sample size of the previous one, measures outcomes for 4 months longer, assesses behavioral outcomes, and hypothesizes a specific psychological process (psychological threat engendered by cross-race interactions) that may make some teachers more sensitive to the benefits of affirmation.</p> <p>Second, we demonstrate the consequences of teacher psychology for student experience. Absent intervention, new White teachers' experiences of psychological threat undermined their own outcomes and those of their students. Yet these feelings of threat are amenable to intervention. When psychological threat is tamped down, such as by affirmation, new White teachers in majority-minoritized schools are more effective in interacting with and educating their students.</p> <p>Finally, and relatedly, we highlight the opportunity for affirmation to have second-order effects, improving the outcomes not only of the original person who was affirmed but also those in their social sphere (Lewin, [<reflink idref="bib34" id="ref73">34</reflink>]; Powers et al., [<reflink idref="bib41" id="ref74">41</reflink>]). By intervening with a single "gatekeeper" teacher, there is the potential to improve outcomes for twenty, forty, or even hundreds of students. An important question for future research will be whether the benefits of affirming teachers carry forward over years for teachers themselves or their students.</p> <hd id="AN0174953490-25">Limitations</hd> <p>Compared to studies that focus on students, studies that focus on teachers necessarily have a smaller population from which to recruit participants. We anticipated this challenge and, therefore, sought to maximize statistical power by attending to features of the study design beyond sample size. In particular, we focused on teachers we most expected to show our theorized effects: White first-year teachers at majority-minoritized schools. To simplify logistics (which might reduce error variance) and to recruit a sample where we would be able to generalize our findings across grade levels on a behavioral measure, we partnered with TFA to administer the study. While reasonable, these study design decisions led to three main limitations.</p> <p>As expected, one limitation of concerns the size of the sample. We were able to collect outcome data from approximately 100 White teachers for our core outcomes, but from only about 30 for the additional outcomes in the second year of the study. As such, these effects should be treated with caution. Encouragingly, however, they are consistent with other findings from the broader affirmation literature (Cohen & Sherman, [<reflink idref="bib12" id="ref75">12</reflink>]).</p> <p>A second limitation concerns the nature of the sample: they are not representative of teachers overall, nor of first-year White teachers. As such, it remains unclear how broad or narrow the benefits of affirmation for teachers might be. Is affirmation of unique value to White teachers (as opposed to non-White teachers), to first-year teachers (as opposed to more veteran teachers), and/or in cross-race contexts (as opposed to situations when the teacher shares the racial-ethnic identity of most of their students)? To what extent would the effects observed here generalize to samples of new White teachers trained through traditional teacher education programs (cf. Matsko et al., [<reflink idref="bib36" id="ref76">36</reflink>]) rather than through TFA? Future research with a broader sample of teachers who vary on key dimensions such as race, years of teaching experience, prior experience in cross-race contexts, and demographic composition of their classroom could directly test the contingencies of when values affirmation or other efforts to reduce stress will improve the outcomes of teachers and their students.</p> <p>A third limitation is that none of our outcomes were assessed at the level of individual students. For example, it would be valuable to have both teacher and student ratings of the quality of the teacher–student relationship and to have student grades or test scores. However, the collection of such data was beyond the scope and capacity of the present study. Where possible, future research should test second-order effects directly. Doing so may illuminate whether student-level benefits of affirming teachers are uniform across students or concentrated among certain groups of students.</p> <hd id="AN0174953490-26">Implications for practice</hd> <p>Collectively, our findings underscore that we can improve classroom experience for both teachers and students by understanding and addressing teachers' psychology (cf. Turetsky et al., [<reflink idref="bib52" id="ref77">52</reflink>]). Because most minoritized students in the United States are currently taught by White teachers, White teachers' psychology is a key target for interventions aimed at educational equity. Although the present study used a values affirmation exercise to alleviate feelings of threat for White teachers, it is not the only way to do so. For example, past research has shown that White teachers give more critical feedback to Black students when they feel supported by administrators (Harber et al., [<reflink idref="bib26" id="ref78">26</reflink>]). Additionally, culturally responsive teaching involves becoming familiar with the prior knowledge and experiences of ethnically diverse students and then using that information to enhance teaching and learning (Gay, [<reflink idref="bib22" id="ref79">22</reflink>]; see also Ladson-Billings, [<reflink idref="bib33" id="ref80">33</reflink>]). Training and supporting teachers in culturally responsive teaching would presumably lower new White teachers' anxiety about teaching in cross-race contexts and improve their well-being and instruction.</p> <hd id="AN0174953490-27">Conclusion</hd> <p>Teachers are stewards of a diverse society. They have the capacity to create classrooms that either alienate or welcome students from a wide range of backgrounds, with long-range consequences for children's success later in life (Chetty et al., [<reflink idref="bib8" id="ref81">8</reflink>]). But cross-race contexts are challenging to navigate because of our collective awareness of and vulnerability to history and stereotypes. The present study contends that many White teachers at majority-minoritized schools experience feelings of threat at work that undermine their effectiveness as educators and their well-being. Consistent with this, the study shows that providing opportunities for these teachers to affirm their sense of self may be one way to alleviate threat and improve those outcomes. Ultimately, better understanding teachers' psychology can put classroom interactions, and students' lives, on a better trajectory.</p> <hd id="AN0174953490-28">Acknowledgements</hd> <p>We thank the teachers who participated in this research; Teach For America Oklahoma staff, especially Bonnie Dilber, Monika Friedman, Abbagail Hamilton, and Loy Maierhauser, for facilitating the project; and Sarita Upadhyay for assistance.</p> <hd id="AN0174953490-29">Author contributions</hd> <p>STB and GLC developed the study concept and design. STB implemented the study and collected the data. CMG conducted primary analyses, with support from STB and GLC. STB drafted the manuscript, and CMG and GLC provided critical revisions.</p> <hd id="AN0174953490-30">Materials and data availability</hd> <p>Study materials are available on OSF: [https://osf.io/jg5tw]. Due to the sensitive nature of the data, they are available upon request from the first author.</p> <hd id="AN0174953490-31">Declarations</hd> <p></p> <hd id="AN0174953490-32">Conflict of interest</hd> <p>We have no known conflicts of interest to disclose.</p> <hd id="AN0174953490-33">Ethics</hd> <p>The Institutional Review Board at Stanford University approved the study procedures. Participating teachers provided active consent.</p> <hd id="AN0174953490-34">Supplementary Information</hd> <p>Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.</p> <p>Graph: Supplementary file1 (DOCX 264 KB)</p> <hd id="AN0174953490-35">Publisher's Note</hd> <p>Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p> <ref id="AN0174953490-36"> <title> References </title> <blist> <bibl id="bib1" idref="ref2" type="bt">1</bibl> <bibtext> Acock AC. A gentle introduction to Stata. 20144; Stata Press</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib2" idref="ref1" type="bt">2</bibl> <bibtext> Anonymous. (2013). Diary of a first-year teacher: The trouble with being white. <ulink href="http://www.takepart.com/article/2013/03/11/diary-first-year-teacher-trouble-being-white-race-classroom">http://www.takepart.com/article/2013/03/11/diary-first-year-teacher-trouble-being-white-race-classroom</ulink></bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib3" idref="ref63" type="bt">3</bibl> <bibtext> Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software. 2015; 67; 1: 1-48. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib4" idref="ref25" type="bt">4</bibl> <bibtext> Beilock SL. Choke: What the secrets of the brain reveal about getting it right when you have to (Reprint edition). 2011; Atria Books</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib5" idref="ref56" type="bt">5</bibl> <bibtext> Bloom BS, Hastings JT, Madaus G. Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning. 1971; McGraw-Hill</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib6" idref="ref34" type="bt">6</bibl> <bibtext> Brady ST, Reeves SL, Garcia J, Purdie-Vaughns V, Cook JE, Taborsky-Barba S, Tomasetti S, Davis EM, Cohen GL. The psychology of the affirmed learner: Spontaneous self-affirmation in the face of stress. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2016; 108; 3: 353-373. 10.1037/edu0000091</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib7" idref="ref6" type="bt">7</bibl> <bibtext> Carter PL, Welner KG. Closing the opportunity gap: What America must do to give every child an even chance. 2013; Oxford University Press</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib8" idref="ref81" type="bt">8</bibl> <bibtext> Chetty R, Friedman JN, Rockoff JE. Measuring the impacts of teachers II: Teacher value-added and student outcomes in adulthood. American Economic Review. 2014; 104; 9: 2633-2679. 10.1257/aer.104.9.2593</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibl id="bib9" idref="ref12" type="bt">9</bibl> <bibtext> Cipriano, C, & Bracket, M. (2020). Teachers are anxious and overwhelmed. They need SEL now more than ever. Edsurge. https://<ulink href="http://www.edsurge.com/news/2020-04-07-teachersare-anxious-and-overwhelmed-they-need-sel-now-more-than-ever">www.edsurge.com/news/2020-04-07-teachersare-anxious-and-overwhelmed-they-need-sel-now-more-than-ever</ulink></bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Clunies-Ross P, Little E, Kienhuis M. Self-reported and actual use of proactive and reactive classroom management strategies and their relationship with teacher stress and student behaviour. Educational Psychology. 2008; 28; 6: 693-710. 10.1080/01443410802206700</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Cohen GL, Garcia J, Purdie-Vaughns V, Apfel N, Brzustoski P. Recursive processes in self-affirmation: Intervening to close the minority achievement gap. Science. 2009; 324; 5925: 400-403. 10.1126/science.1170769</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Cohen GL, Sherman DK. The psychology of change: Self-affirmation and social psychological intervention. Annual Review of Psychology. 2014; 65; 1: 333-371. 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115137</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Cohen GL, Steele CM, Ross LD. The mentor's dilemma: Providing critical feedback across the racial divide. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1999; 25; 10: 1302-1318. 10.1177/0146167299258011</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 1983; 24; 4: 385-396. 10.2307/2136404</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Cook JE, Purdie-Vaughns V, Garcia J, Cohen GL. Chronic threat and contingent belonging: Protective benefits of values affirmation on identity development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2012; 102; 3: 479-496. 10.1037/a0026312</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Creswell JD, Dutcher JM, Klein WM, Harris PR, Levine JM. Self-affirmation improves problem-solving under stress. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8; 5: e62593. 10.1371/journal.pone.0062593</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Critcher CR, Dunning D. Self-affirmations provide a broader perspective on self-threat. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2015; 41; 1: 3-18. 10.1177/0146167214554956</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> de Brey, C, Musu, L, McFarland, J, Wilkinson-Flicker, S, Diliberti, M, Zhang, A, Branstetter, C, & Wang, X. (2019). Status and Trends in the Education of Racial and Ethnic Groups 2018 (NCES 2019–038). US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2019/2019038.pdf</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Delpit L. Other people's children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. 2006; New Press</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Frankenberg E. The segregation of American teachers. Education Policy Analysis Archives. 2009; 17; 1: 1-45. 10.14507/epaa.v17n1.2009</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Friedman IA. Burnout in teachers: Shattered dreams of impeccable professional performance. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2000; 56; 5: 595-606. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(200005)56:5<595:AID-JCLP2>3.0.CO;2-Q</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Gay G. Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. 2010; Teachers College Press</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Goyer JP, Garcia J, Purdie-Vaughns V, Binning KR, Cook JE, Reeves SL, Apfel N, Taborsky-Barba S, Sherman DK, Cohen GL. Self-affirmation facilitates minority middle schoolers' progress along college trajectories. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2017; 114; 29: 7594-7599. 10.1073/pnas.1617923114</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Hanselman P, Bruch SK, Gamoran A, Borman GD. Threat in context: School moderation of the impact of social identity threat on racial/ethnic achievement gaps. Sociology of Education. 2014; 87; 2: 106-124. 10.1177/0038040714525970</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Harber KD. Feedback to minorities: Evidence of a positive bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1998; 74; 3: 622-628. 10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.622</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Harber KD, Stafford R, Kennedy KA. The positive feedback bias as a response to self-image threat. British Journal of Social Psychology. 2010; 49; 1: 207-218. 10.1348/014466609X473956</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Harper SR. Race without racism: How higher education researchers minimize racist institutional norms. The Review of Higher Education. 2012; 36; 1: 9-29. 10.1353/rhe.2012.0047</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Hussar, W. J, & Bailey, T. M. (2020). Projections of Education Statistics to 2028 (NCES 2020-024). US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2020/2020024.pdf</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Jacoby-Senghor DS, Sinclair S, Shelton JN. A lesson in bias: The relationship between implicit racial bias and performance in pedagogical contexts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2016; 63: 50-55. 10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.010</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Kinnunen U, Leskinen E. Teacher stress during a school year: Covariance and mean structure analyses. Journal of Occupational Psychology. 1989; 62; 2: 111-122. 10.1111/j.2044-8325.1989.tb00482.x</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB. lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software. 2017; 82; 13: 1-26. 10.18637/jss.v082.i13</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Kyriacou C. Teacher stress: Directions for future research. Educational Review. 2001; 53; 1: 27-35. 10.1080/00131910120033628</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Ladson-Billings GJ. Crossing over to Canaan: The journey of new teachers in diverse classrooms. 2001; Jossey-Bass</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Lewin K. Forces behind food habits and methods of change. Bulletin of the National Research Council. 1943; 108: 35-65</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Maslach C, Schaufeli WB, Leiter MP. Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology. 2001; 52; 1: 397-422. 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Matsko KK, Ronfeldt M, Nolan HG. How different are they? Comparing teacher preparation offered by traditional, alternative, and residency pathways. Journal of Teacher Education. 2022; 73; 3: 225-239. 10.1177/00224871211015976</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Morgan J, Atkin L. Expelling stress for primary school teachers: Self-affirmation increases positive emotions in teaching and emotion reappraisal. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2016; 13; 5: 500. 10.3390/ijerph13050500</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Okonofua JA, Goyer JP, Lindsay CA, Haugabrook J, Walton GM. A scalable empathic-mindset intervention reduces group disparities in school suspensions. Science Advances. 2022; 8; 12: eabj0691. 10.1126/sciadv.abj0691</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Okonofua JA, Paunesku D, Walton GM. Brief intervention to encourage empathic discipline cuts suspension rates in half among adolescents. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2016; 113; 19: 5221-5226. 10.1073/pnas.1523698113</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Pearman FA, Curran FC, Fisher B, Gardella J. Are achievement gaps related to discipline gaps?. Evidence from National Data. AERA Open. 2019; 5; 4: 1-18. 10.1177/2332858419875440</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Powers JT, Cook JE, Purdie-Vaughns V, Garcia J, Apfel N, Cohen GL. Changing environments by changing individuals: The emergent effects of psychological intervention. Psychological Science. 2016; 27; 2: 150-160. 10.1177/0956797615614591</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Purdie-Vaughns, V, Cohen, G. L, Garcia, J, Sumner, R, Cook, J. C, & Apfel, N. (2009). Improving minority academic performance: How a values-affirmation intervention works. Teachers College Record. https://<ulink href="http://www.tcrecord.org/content.asp?contentid=15774">www.tcrecord.org/content.asp?contentid=15774</ulink></bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Renzulli LA, Parrott HM, Beattie IR. Racial mismatch and school type: Teacher satisfaction and retention in charter and traditional public schools. Sociology of Education. 2011; 84; 1: 23-48. 10.1177/003804071039272</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Richeson JA, Trawalter S. Why do interracial interactions impair executive function? A resource depletion account. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2005; 88; 6: 934-947. 10.1037/0022-3514.88.6.934</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Roorda DL, Koomen HMY, Spilt JL, Oort FJ. The influence of affective teacher–student relationships on students' school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research. 2011; 81; 4: 493-529. 10.3102/0034654311421793</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Shelton JN, Richeson JAZanna MP. Interracial interactions: A relational approach. Advances in experimental social psychology. 2006; Elsevier Academic Press: 121-181. 10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38003-3</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Sherman DK, Cohen GL, Nelson LD, Nussbaum AD, Bunyan DP, Garcia J. Affirmed yet unaware: Exploring the role of awareness in the process of self-affirmation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2009; 97; 5: 745-764. 10.1037/a0015451</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Steele CMBerkowitz L. The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 21. Social psychological studies of the self: Perspectives and programs. 1988; Academic Press: 261-302</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Steele CM. A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist. 1997; 52; 6: 613-629. 10.1037/0003-066X.52.6.613</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Taie, S, & Lewis, L. (2022). Characteristics of 2020–21 Public and Private K–12 School Teachers in the United States: Results from the National Teacher and Principal Survey First Look (NCES 2022-113). US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2022/2022113.pdf</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Trawalter S, Richeson JA, Shelton JN. Predicting behavior during interracial interactions: A stress and coping approach. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2009; 13; 4: 243-268. 10.1177/1088868309345850</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Turetsky KM, Sinclair S, Starck JG, Shelton JN. Beyond students: How teacher psychology shapes educational inequality. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2021; 25; 8: 697-709. 10.1016/j.tics.2021.04.006</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Vinopal K, Holt SB. Rookie mistakes: The interplay of teacher experience and racial representation. Educational Researcher. 2019; 48; 7: 421-437. 10.3102/0013189X19867699</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Walton GM, Cohen GL. A question of belonging: Race, social fit, and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2007; 92; 1: 82-96. 10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.82</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Walton GM, Wilson TD. Wise interventions: Psychological remedies for social and personal problems. Psychological Bulletin. 2018; 125; 5: 617-655. 10.1037/rev0000115</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Williams CL, Hirschi Q, Sublett KV, Hulleman CS, Wilson TD. A brief social belonging intervention improves academic outcomes for minoritized high school students. Motivation Science. 2020; 6; 4: 423-437. 10.1037/mot0000175</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Wu Z, Spreckelsen TF, Cohen GL. A meta-analysis of the effect of values affirmation on academic achievement. Journal of Social Issues. 2021; 77; 3: 702-750. 10.1111/josi.12415</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Yeager DS, Purdie-Vaughns V, Hooper SY, Cohen GL. Loss of institutional trust among racial and ethnic minority adolescents: A consequence of procedural injustice and a cause of life-span outcomes. Child Development. 2017; 88; 2: 658-676. 10.1111/cdev.12697</bibtext> </blist> </ref> <ref id="AN0174953490-37"> <title> Footnotes </title> <blist> <bibtext> We refer to Black, Latinx, and Native students as "minoritized" rather than "minorities" to highlight the socially constructed nature of the subordination of these groups in U.S. educational institutions (Harper, [27], Footnote 1; see also Williams et al., [56]). Indeed, minoritized students represented a plurality of the students in the schools in the present study.</bibtext> </blist> <blist> <bibtext> Between Cohorts 1 and 2, TFA revised their end-of-year assessment, omitting the teacher–student relationship items. Unaware of this, we included our own teacher–student relationship measure in our survey for Cohort 2. This measure, originally intended to be supplemental, became the primary assessment of teacher–student relationships for Cohort 2.</bibtext> </blist> </ref> <aug> <p>By Shannon T. Brady; Camilla Mutoni Griffiths and Geoffrey L. Cohen</p> <p>Reported by Author; Author; Author</p> <p></p> <p>Shannon T. Brady is an assistant professor of psychology at Wake Forest University. Her research examines how people make meaning of themselves and their environments, how various practices and messages affect this meaning-making, and the consequences thereof for diverse outcomes including wellbeing, achievement, relationships, and health. Previously, she was a middle and elementary school teacher at Taopi Cikala Owayawa on the Pine Ridge Reservation in South Dakota. She has a M.S. in education from Black Hills State University and a Ph.D. in developmental and psychological sciences in education from Stanford University.</p> <p>Camilla Mutoni Griffiths is a research scientist at Stanford SPARQ (https://sparq.stanford.edu/), a "do tank" that brings researchers and practitioners together to reduce disparities using behavioral science. She studies how our interactions with American institutions contribute to our racial attitudes and biases. She has a Ph.D. in social psychology from Stanford University.</p> <p>Geoffrey L. Cohen is the James G. March Professor in Organizational Studies in Education and Business, Professor of Psychology and, by courtesy, of Organizational Behavior at the Graduate School of Business at Stanford University. His research includes laboratory experiments, longitudinal studies, content analyses, and randomized field experiments. One specific area of research addresses the effects of group identity on achievement, with a focus on underperformance and racial and gender achievement gaps. Additional research programs address hiring discrimination, the psychology of closed-mindedness and inter-group conflict, and psychological processes underlying anti-social and health-risk behavior.</p> </aug> <nolink nlid="nl1" bibid="bib18" firstref="ref3"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl2" bibid="bib40" firstref="ref4"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl3" bibid="bib28" firstref="ref5"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl4" bibid="bib49" firstref="ref7"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl5" bibid="bib11" firstref="ref8"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl6" bibid="bib52" firstref="ref9"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl7" bibid="bib21" firstref="ref10"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl8" bibid="bib32" firstref="ref11"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl9" bibid="bib50" firstref="ref13"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl10" bibid="bib33" firstref="ref14"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl11" bibid="bib58" firstref="ref15"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl12" bibid="bib51" firstref="ref16"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl13" bibid="bib20" firstref="ref17"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl14" bibid="bib19" firstref="ref18"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl15" bibid="bib43" firstref="ref19"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl16" bibid="bib13" firstref="ref20"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl17" bibid="bib10" firstref="ref21"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl18" bibid="bib45" firstref="ref22"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl19" bibid="bib46" firstref="ref23"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl20" bibid="bib44" firstref="ref24"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl21" bibid="bib29" firstref="ref26"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl22" bibid="bib25" firstref="ref27"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl23" bibid="bib26" firstref="ref28"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl24" bibid="bib53" firstref="ref29"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl25" bibid="bib48" firstref="ref31"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl26" bibid="bib12" firstref="ref32"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl27" bibid="bib17" firstref="ref33"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl28" bibid="bib16" firstref="ref35"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl29" bibid="bib24" firstref="ref40"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl30" bibid="bib57" firstref="ref41"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl31" bibid="bib37" firstref="ref42"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl32" bibid="bib55" firstref="ref44"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl33" bibid="bib39" firstref="ref45"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl34" bibid="bib23" firstref="ref46"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl35" bibid="bib42" firstref="ref49"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl36" bibid="bib30" firstref="ref50"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl37" bibid="bib15" firstref="ref51"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl38" bibid="bib54" firstref="ref57"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl39" bibid="bib14" firstref="ref59"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl40" bibid="bib35" firstref="ref60"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl41" bibid="bib47" firstref="ref61"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl42" bibid="bib31" firstref="ref64"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl43" bibid="bib27" firstref="ref65"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl44" bibid="bib38" firstref="ref71"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl45" bibid="bib34" firstref="ref73"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl46" bibid="bib41" firstref="ref74"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl47" bibid="bib36" firstref="ref76"></nolink> <nolink nlid="nl48" bibid="bib22" firstref="ref79"></nolink>
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1408446
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: The Affirmed (White) Teacher in a Cross-Race Context
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Shannon+T%2E+Brady%22">Shannon T. Brady</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3975-3301">0000-0003-3975-3301</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Camilla+Mutoni+Griffiths%22">Camilla Mutoni Griffiths</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7300-5553">0000-0002-7300-5553</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Geoffrey+L%2E+Cohen%22">Geoffrey L. Cohen</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Social+Psychology+of+Education%3A+An+International+Journal%22"><i>Social Psychology of Education: An International Journal</i></searchLink>. 2024 27(1):47-68.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 22
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2024
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Racial+Relations%22">Racial Relations</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22White+Teachers%22">White Teachers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Values+Clarification%22">Values Clarification</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Values+Education%22">Values Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Stress+Management%22">Stress Management</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Public+School+Teachers%22">Public School Teachers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Minority+Group+Students%22">Minority Group Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Beginning+Teachers%22">Beginning Teachers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Well+Being%22">Well Being</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Student+Relationship%22">Teacher Student Relationship</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Individual+Development%22">Individual Development</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Education+Programs%22">Teacher Education Programs</searchLink>
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1007/s11218-023-09812-z
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 1381-2890<br />1573-1928
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Within psychology, efforts to address racial-ethnic disparities in students' academic outcomes have focused primarily on students themselves. But there is another important person in classrooms: the teacher. In the United States, most racial-ethnically minoritized students are taught by White teachers. Drawing on research on cross-race interactions, we argue that for White teachers--especially those new to the profession--this dynamic is likely to elicit psychological threat, which then undermines their relationships with students, their well-being, and their effectiveness as an instructor. We hypothesized that values affirmation, a technique to mitigate threat and stress, could improve these outcomes. We randomly assigned White public school teachers (N = 109) at schools serving predominantly minoritized students to complete a values affirmation exercise or a matched control exercise in the fall of their first year of teaching. Five months later, affirmed teachers reported greater well-being and better teacher-student relationships than their control counterparts, and their classrooms were rated as more rigorous and more supportive of students' academic growth by trained observers.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2024
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1408446
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1408446
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s11218-023-09812-z
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 22
        StartPage: 47
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Racial Relations
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: White Teachers
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Values Clarification
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Values Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Stress Management
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Public School Teachers
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Minority Group Students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Beginning Teachers
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Well Being
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Teacher Student Relationship
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Individual Development
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Teacher Education Programs
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: The Affirmed (White) Teacher in a Cross-Race Context
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Shannon T. Brady
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Camilla Mutoni Griffiths
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Geoffrey L. Cohen
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 2024
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 1381-2890
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 1573-1928
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 27
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Social Psychology of Education: An International Journal
              Type: main
ResultId 1