Assessment Tool to Understand How Students Justify Their Decisions in Data Comparison Problems
Saved in:
| Title: | Assessment Tool to Understand How Students Justify Their Decisions in Data Comparison Problems |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Karel Kok (ORCID |
| Source: | Physical Review Physics Education Research. 2023 19(2). |
| Availability: | American Physical Society. One Physics Ellipse 4th Floor, College Park, MD 20740-3844. Tel: 301-209-3200; Fax: 301-209-0865; e-mail: assocpub@aps.org; Web site: https://journals.aps.org/prper/ |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 22 |
| Publication Date: | 2023 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Secondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Data Analysis, Comparative Analysis, Secondary School Students, Teaching Methods, Computer Assisted Instruction, Physics, Concept Formation, Measurement Techniques, Distance Education, Foreign Countries, Scientific Concepts |
| Geographic Terms: | Germany |
| DOI: | 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020141 |
| ISSN: | 2469-9896 |
| Abstract: | Students at all levels of education experience difficulties with the concepts of measurement uncertainties. One task that includes concepts of measurement uncertainties is a data comparison problem where students decide whether two datasets are in agreement or not--an authentic scientific practice. To aid students with these concepts and tasks, sensitive instruments are needed that probe students' understanding and track their progress. We present a tool in the form of a coding manual that analyzes students' written justifications for such a data comparison problem. With this coding manual, justifications are coded based on the quantity that is compared and the deciding criterion in this comparison. Our coding manual was used in the evaluation of a digital learning environment (DLE). In this evaluation, 154 participants (aged 14-17 years) wrote a justification for a data comparison problem before and after going through the DLE. These participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups where each group was taught an increased amount of concepts regarding measurement uncertainties. By analyzing the participants' justifications with our coding manual, we could probe their ability to compare datasets on a fine-grained level. The sensitivity of our tool was illustrated by the increase in higher quality codes with the increased conceptual teaching between the three groups. We argue that our tool for coding justifications can be applied to any data comparison problem giving detailed information about what data analysis methods students use and how they reach their conclusion and thus contributes to the research on students' understanding of measurement uncertainties. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2024 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1409492 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1409492 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Assessment Tool to Understand How Students Justify Their Decisions in Data Comparison Problems – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Karel+Kok%22">Karel Kok</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4767-1333">0000-0002-4767-1333</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Burkhard+Priemer%22">Burkhard Priemer</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5399-7631">0000-0001-5399-7631</externalLink>) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Physical+Review+Physics+Education+Research%22"><i>Physical Review Physics Education Research</i></searchLink>. 2023 19(2). – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: American Physical Society. One Physics Ellipse 4th Floor, College Park, MD 20740-3844. Tel: 301-209-3200; Fax: 301-209-0865; e-mail: assocpub@aps.org; Web site: https://journals.aps.org/prper/ – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 22 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2023 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Secondary+Education%22">Secondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Data+Analysis%22">Data Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Comparative+Analysis%22">Comparative Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Secondary+School+Students%22">Secondary School Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teaching+Methods%22">Teaching Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+Assisted+Instruction%22">Computer Assisted Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Physics%22">Physics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Concept+Formation%22">Concept Formation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Measurement+Techniques%22">Measurement Techniques</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Distance+Education%22">Distance Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scientific+Concepts%22">Scientific Concepts</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Germany%22">Germany</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020141 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 2469-9896 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Students at all levels of education experience difficulties with the concepts of measurement uncertainties. One task that includes concepts of measurement uncertainties is a data comparison problem where students decide whether two datasets are in agreement or not--an authentic scientific practice. To aid students with these concepts and tasks, sensitive instruments are needed that probe students' understanding and track their progress. We present a tool in the form of a coding manual that analyzes students' written justifications for such a data comparison problem. With this coding manual, justifications are coded based on the quantity that is compared and the deciding criterion in this comparison. Our coding manual was used in the evaluation of a digital learning environment (DLE). In this evaluation, 154 participants (aged 14-17 years) wrote a justification for a data comparison problem before and after going through the DLE. These participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups where each group was taught an increased amount of concepts regarding measurement uncertainties. By analyzing the participants' justifications with our coding manual, we could probe their ability to compare datasets on a fine-grained level. The sensitivity of our tool was illustrated by the increase in higher quality codes with the increased conceptual teaching between the three groups. We argue that our tool for coding justifications can be applied to any data comparison problem giving detailed information about what data analysis methods students use and how they reach their conclusion and thus contributes to the research on students' understanding of measurement uncertainties. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2024 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1409492 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1409492 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020141 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 22 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Data Analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Comparative Analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Secondary School Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Teaching Methods Type: general – SubjectFull: Computer Assisted Instruction Type: general – SubjectFull: Physics Type: general – SubjectFull: Concept Formation Type: general – SubjectFull: Measurement Techniques Type: general – SubjectFull: Distance Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries Type: general – SubjectFull: Scientific Concepts Type: general – SubjectFull: Germany Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Assessment Tool to Understand How Students Justify Their Decisions in Data Comparison Problems Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Karel Kok – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Burkhard Priemer IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2023 Identifiers: – Type: issn-electronic Value: 2469-9896 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 19 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: Physical Review Physics Education Research Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |