Developing a Boundary Crossing Learning Trajectory: Supporting Engineering Students to Collaborate and Co-Create across Disciplinary, Cultural and Professional Practices

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Developing a Boundary Crossing Learning Trajectory: Supporting Engineering Students to Collaborate and Co-Create across Disciplinary, Cultural and Professional Practices
Language: English
Authors: K. P. J. Fortuin (ORCID 0000-0002-2754-3713), Judith T. M. Gulikers (ORCID 0000-0002-9318-312X), Nynke C. Post Uiterweer, Carla Oonk, Cassandra W. S. Tho
Source: European Journal of Engineering Education. 2024 49(2):212-235.
Availability: Taylor & Francis. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 24
Publication Date: 2024
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Tests/Questionnaires
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Learning Trajectories, Engineering Education, Cooperative Learning, Interdisciplinary Approach, Curriculum Development, Learning Activities, College Students, Participatory Research, Action Research, Educational Innovation, Experiential Learning, Educational Practices
DOI: 10.1080/03043797.2023.2219234
ISSN: 0304-3797
1469-5898
Abstract: The competence to work together and co-create with others outside one's own scientific domain, culture or professional practice is a critical competence for engineers to respond to global challenges. In this context, boundary crossing (BC) competence is crucial. We reflect on a university-wide participatory action research educational innovation project for developing and implementing BC in its education, draw conceptual and practical lessons learned and identify success factors. The BC theory and its four learning mechanisms (identification, coordination, reflection, transformation) are introduced and we argue that they provide a solid foundation for BC competence development in courses and curricula. We show that BC can relatively easy be implemented in existing education, yet it is crucial to use experiential types of learning to make this rather abstract concept tangible for both teachers and students. Two key lessons learned for developing BC education are to see BC competence as a generic competence and boundaries as learning opportunities.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2024
Accession Number: EJ1415031
Database: ERIC
Be the first to leave a comment!
You must be logged in first