Testing Expectations and Retrieval Practice Modulate Repetition Learning of Visuospatial Arrays

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Testing Expectations and Retrieval Practice Modulate Repetition Learning of Visuospatial Arrays
Language: English
Authors: Philipp Musfeld (ORCID 0000-0002-6539-0105), Alessandra S. Souza (ORCID 0000-0002-1057-8426), Klaus Oberauer (ORCID 0000-0003-3902-7318)
Source: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 2024 50(5):740-758.
Availability: American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 19
Publication Date: 2024
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: Short Term Memory, Long Term Memory, Testing, Expectation, Learning Processes, Repetition, Recall (Psychology), Serial Ordering
DOI: 10.1037/xlm0001298
ISSN: 0278-7393
1939-1285
Abstract: One of the best-known demonstrations of long-term learning through repetition is the Hebb effect: Immediate recall of a memory list repeated amidst nonrepeated lists improves steadily with repetitions. However, previous studies often failed to observe this effect for visuospatial arrays. Souza and Oberauer (2022) showed that the strongest determinant for producing learning was the difficulty of the test: Learning was consistently observed when participants recalled all items of a visuospatial array (difficult test) but not if only one item was recalled, or recognition procedures were used (less difficult tests). This suggests that long-term learning was promoted by increased testing demands over the short term. Alternatively, it is possible that lower testing demands still lead to learning but prevented the application of what was learned. In four preregistered experiments (N = 981), we ruled out this alternative explanation: Changing the type of memory test midway through the experiment from less demanding (i.e., single item recall or recognition) to a more demanding test (i.e., full item recall) did not reveal hidden learning, and changing it from the more demanding to a less demanding test did not conceal learning. Mixing high and low demanding tests for nonrepeated arrays, however, eventually produced Hebb learning even for the less demanding testing conditions. We propose that testing affects long-term learning in two ways: Expectations of the test difficulty influence how information is encoded into memory, and retrieval consolidates this information in memory.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2024
Accession Number: EJ1420471
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1420471
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Testing Expectations and Retrieval Practice Modulate Repetition Learning of Visuospatial Arrays
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Philipp+Musfeld%22">Philipp Musfeld</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6539-0105">0000-0002-6539-0105</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Alessandra+S%2E+Souza%22">Alessandra S. Souza</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1057-8426">0000-0002-1057-8426</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Klaus+Oberauer%22">Klaus Oberauer</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3902-7318">0000-0003-3902-7318</externalLink>)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Journal+of+Experimental+Psychology%3A+Learning%2C+Memory%2C+and+Cognition%22"><i>Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition</i></searchLink>. 2024 50(5):740-758.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 19
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2024
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Short+Term+Memory%22">Short Term Memory</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Long+Term+Memory%22">Long Term Memory</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Testing%22">Testing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Expectation%22">Expectation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Learning+Processes%22">Learning Processes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Repetition%22">Repetition</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Recall+%28Psychology%29%22">Recall (Psychology)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Serial+Ordering%22">Serial Ordering</searchLink>
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1037/xlm0001298
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 0278-7393<br />1939-1285
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: One of the best-known demonstrations of long-term learning through repetition is the Hebb effect: Immediate recall of a memory list repeated amidst nonrepeated lists improves steadily with repetitions. However, previous studies often failed to observe this effect for visuospatial arrays. Souza and Oberauer (2022) showed that the strongest determinant for producing learning was the difficulty of the test: Learning was consistently observed when participants recalled all items of a visuospatial array (difficult test) but not if only one item was recalled, or recognition procedures were used (less difficult tests). This suggests that long-term learning was promoted by increased testing demands over the short term. Alternatively, it is possible that lower testing demands still lead to learning but prevented the application of what was learned. In four preregistered experiments (N = 981), we ruled out this alternative explanation: Changing the type of memory test midway through the experiment from less demanding (i.e., single item recall or recognition) to a more demanding test (i.e., full item recall) did not reveal hidden learning, and changing it from the more demanding to a less demanding test did not conceal learning. Mixing high and low demanding tests for nonrepeated arrays, however, eventually produced Hebb learning even for the less demanding testing conditions. We propose that testing affects long-term learning in two ways: Expectations of the test difficulty influence how information is encoded into memory, and retrieval consolidates this information in memory.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2024
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1420471
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1420471
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1037/xlm0001298
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 19
        StartPage: 740
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Short Term Memory
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Long Term Memory
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Testing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Expectation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Learning Processes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Repetition
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Recall (Psychology)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Serial Ordering
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Testing Expectations and Retrieval Practice Modulate Repetition Learning of Visuospatial Arrays
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Philipp Musfeld
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Alessandra S. Souza
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Klaus Oberauer
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 2024
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 0278-7393
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 1939-1285
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 50
            – Type: issue
              Value: 5
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
              Type: main
ResultId 1