The Facilitator Model: Investigating a Novel Dual Credit Experience for Open-Ended Design Coursework

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The Facilitator Model: Investigating a Novel Dual Credit Experience for Open-Ended Design Coursework
Language: English
Authors: Scott Thorne (ORCID 0000-0002-3742-8903), Greg J. Strimel, Nathan Mentzer, David Sears
Source: Journal for STEM Education Research. 2022 5(3):479-508.
Availability: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 30
Publication Date: 2022
Sponsoring Agency: National Science Foundation (NSF), Division of Undergraduate Education (DUE)
Contract Number: 2044288
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: High Schools
Secondary Education
Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: High School Teachers, STEM Education, Dual Enrollment, College School Cooperation, Undergraduate Students, Engineering Education, Curriculum Development, Courses, Charter Schools, Academic Records, Required Courses, College Credits
DOI: 10.1007/s41979-022-00075-5
ISSN: 2520-8705
2520-8713
Abstract: This study explored the implementation of a novel approach to dual credit referred to as the facilitator model that can be suited for STEM-focused coursework such as courses focused on engineering, design, technology, and innovation. Unlike other models, high school teachers facilitate the implementation of a college course for both high school and college credit in "collaboration" with a university instructor who evaluates student learning. This novel approach was specifically implemented for an open-ended undergraduate design course within an engineering technology college, similar to many first-year engineering course experiences that emphasize project-based learning, from a large research-intensive public university. For this study, the facilitator model was piloted with five high school teachers as facilitators of an undergraduate design course for dual credit at two innovative, STEM-focused public charter schools. The qualitative research design focused on examining (1) teacher needs while implementing, and perceptions of, the dual credit facilitator model for an undergraduate design course in urban public charter schools and (2) the impact of this model on student learning. This study included the collection and analysis of over 90 h of interviews, focus groups, surveys, and observations. Results provide a promising outlook for the use of the facilitator model when delivering dual credit content that is open ended and within the context of design, technology, and engineering by (1) navigating multiple institutional policies and processes related to dual-credit implementation, (2) providing ongoing support and fostering collaboration between high schools and university, (3) enabling students to earn directly transcripted college credits that count as a required course toward degree completion, and (4) increasing affordability and access to dual credit coursework. These potential advantages over other dual credit models can help address barriers that may limit access to dual credit coursework, specifically for underserved high schools.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2024
Accession Number: EJ1420664
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1420664
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: The Facilitator Model: Investigating a Novel Dual Credit Experience for Open-Ended Design Coursework
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Scott+Thorne%22">Scott Thorne</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3742-8903">0000-0002-3742-8903</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Greg+J%2E+Strimel%22">Greg J. Strimel</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Nathan+Mentzer%22">Nathan Mentzer</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22David+Sears%22">David Sears</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Journal+for+STEM+Education+Research%22"><i>Journal for STEM Education Research</i></searchLink>. 2022 5(3):479-508.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 30
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2022
– Name: SourceSuprt
  Label: Sponsoring Agency
  Group: SrcSuprt
  Data: National Science Foundation (NSF), Division of Undergraduate Education (DUE)
– Name: NumberContract
  Label: Contract Number
  Group: NumCntrct
  Data: 2044288
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22High+Schools%22">High Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Secondary+Education%22">Secondary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22High+School+Teachers%22">High School Teachers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22STEM+Education%22">STEM Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Dual+Enrollment%22">Dual Enrollment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+School+Cooperation%22">College School Cooperation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Undergraduate+Students%22">Undergraduate Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Engineering+Education%22">Engineering Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Curriculum+Development%22">Curriculum Development</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Courses%22">Courses</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Charter+Schools%22">Charter Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Academic+Records%22">Academic Records</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Required+Courses%22">Required Courses</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Credits%22">College Credits</searchLink>
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1007/s41979-022-00075-5
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 2520-8705<br />2520-8713
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: This study explored the implementation of a novel approach to dual credit referred to as the facilitator model that can be suited for STEM-focused coursework such as courses focused on engineering, design, technology, and innovation. Unlike other models, high school teachers facilitate the implementation of a college course for both high school and college credit in "collaboration" with a university instructor who evaluates student learning. This novel approach was specifically implemented for an open-ended undergraduate design course within an engineering technology college, similar to many first-year engineering course experiences that emphasize project-based learning, from a large research-intensive public university. For this study, the facilitator model was piloted with five high school teachers as facilitators of an undergraduate design course for dual credit at two innovative, STEM-focused public charter schools. The qualitative research design focused on examining (1) teacher needs while implementing, and perceptions of, the dual credit facilitator model for an undergraduate design course in urban public charter schools and (2) the impact of this model on student learning. This study included the collection and analysis of over 90 h of interviews, focus groups, surveys, and observations. Results provide a promising outlook for the use of the facilitator model when delivering dual credit content that is open ended and within the context of design, technology, and engineering by (1) navigating multiple institutional policies and processes related to dual-credit implementation, (2) providing ongoing support and fostering collaboration between high schools and university, (3) enabling students to earn directly transcripted college credits that count as a required course toward degree completion, and (4) increasing affordability and access to dual credit coursework. These potential advantages over other dual credit models can help address barriers that may limit access to dual credit coursework, specifically for underserved high schools.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2024
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1420664
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1420664
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s41979-022-00075-5
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 30
        StartPage: 479
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: High School Teachers
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: STEM Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Dual Enrollment
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: College School Cooperation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Undergraduate Students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Engineering Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Curriculum Development
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Courses
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Charter Schools
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Academic Records
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Required Courses
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: College Credits
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: The Facilitator Model: Investigating a Novel Dual Credit Experience for Open-Ended Design Coursework
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Scott Thorne
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Greg J. Strimel
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Nathan Mentzer
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: David Sears
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 12
              Type: published
              Y: 2022
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 2520-8705
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 2520-8713
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 5
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Journal for STEM Education Research
              Type: main
ResultId 1