Using Qualitative Methods to Measure and Understand Key Features of Adolescent Bullying: A Call to Action
Saved in:
| Title: | Using Qualitative Methods to Measure and Understand Key Features of Adolescent Bullying: A Call to Action |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Natalie Spadafora (ORCID |
| Source: | International Journal of Bullying Prevention. 2022 4(3):230-241. |
| Availability: | Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/ |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 12 |
| Publication Date: | 2022 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Descriptive |
| Descriptors: | Adolescents, Bullying, Victims, Behavior, Prevention, Power Structure, Goal Orientation, Definitions, Theories |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s42380-022-00116-y |
| ISSN: | 2523-3653 2523-3661 |
| Abstract: | Bullying is a significant problem that has received a great amount of research attention, yet a basic definition of bullying has proven challenging for researchers to agree upon. Differences of definitions between academics and the public pose additional problems for the ongoing study and prevention of bullying. Qualitative methodologies may afford unique insights into the conceptualization of bullying and how we might reconcile existing definitional differences. In particular, we focus on the theoretically derived definition created by Volk et al. (2014). In this definition, three main aspects of bullying behavior are considered: (1) there is a power imbalance between the perpetrator and the victim, (2) the behavior is goal-directed, and (3) the behavior has a harmful impact. We review the qualitative evidence in support of the definition while simultaneously drawing attention to the potentials of qualitative research for furthering our understanding of all definitions of bullying. We argue that qualitative methods provide researchers with a unique perspective that cannot be practically obtained by the more common use of quantitative methods and offer suggestions for future methodological practices to study bullying. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2024 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1420709 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1420709 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Using Qualitative Methods to Measure and Understand Key Features of Adolescent Bullying: A Call to Action – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Natalie+Spadafora%22">Natalie Spadafora</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8498-1712">0000-0001-8498-1712</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Anthony+A%2E+Volk%22">Anthony A. Volk</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Andrew+V%2E+Dane%22">Andrew V. Dane</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22International+Journal+of+Bullying+Prevention%22"><i>International Journal of Bullying Prevention</i></searchLink>. 2022 4(3):230-241. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/ – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 12 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2022 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Descriptive – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Adolescents%22">Adolescents</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Bullying%22">Bullying</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Victims%22">Victims</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Behavior%22">Behavior</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Prevention%22">Prevention</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Power+Structure%22">Power Structure</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Goal+Orientation%22">Goal Orientation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Definitions%22">Definitions</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Theories%22">Theories</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1007/s42380-022-00116-y – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 2523-3653<br />2523-3661 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Bullying is a significant problem that has received a great amount of research attention, yet a basic definition of bullying has proven challenging for researchers to agree upon. Differences of definitions between academics and the public pose additional problems for the ongoing study and prevention of bullying. Qualitative methodologies may afford unique insights into the conceptualization of bullying and how we might reconcile existing definitional differences. In particular, we focus on the theoretically derived definition created by Volk et al. (2014). In this definition, three main aspects of bullying behavior are considered: (1) there is a power imbalance between the perpetrator and the victim, (2) the behavior is goal-directed, and (3) the behavior has a harmful impact. We review the qualitative evidence in support of the definition while simultaneously drawing attention to the potentials of qualitative research for furthering our understanding of all definitions of bullying. We argue that qualitative methods provide researchers with a unique perspective that cannot be practically obtained by the more common use of quantitative methods and offer suggestions for future methodological practices to study bullying. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2024 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1420709 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1420709 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1007/s42380-022-00116-y Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 12 StartPage: 230 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Adolescents Type: general – SubjectFull: Bullying Type: general – SubjectFull: Victims Type: general – SubjectFull: Behavior Type: general – SubjectFull: Prevention Type: general – SubjectFull: Power Structure Type: general – SubjectFull: Goal Orientation Type: general – SubjectFull: Definitions Type: general – SubjectFull: Theories Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Using Qualitative Methods to Measure and Understand Key Features of Adolescent Bullying: A Call to Action Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Natalie Spadafora – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Anthony A. Volk – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Andrew V. Dane IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2022 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 2523-3653 – Type: issn-electronic Value: 2523-3661 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 4 – Type: issue Value: 3 Titles: – TitleFull: International Journal of Bullying Prevention Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |