View in EDS

The (Im)Possibility of Education: Theory and Method in Paolo Freire's 'Pedagogy of the Oppressed' and Gayatri Spivak's 'Righting Wrongs'

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The (Im)Possibility of Education: Theory and Method in Paolo Freire's 'Pedagogy of the Oppressed' and Gayatri Spivak's 'Righting Wrongs'
Language: English
Authors: Fredrik Svensson
Source: Dialogic Pedagogy. 2024 12(1):A1-A15.
Availability: University Library System, University of Pittsburgh. 3960 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15260. Tel: 302-831-1266; 302-831-4441; e-mail: dpjournal@pitt.edu; Web site: http://dpj.pitt.edu
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 15
Publication Date: 2024
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Evaluative
Descriptors: Teaching Methods, Student Experience, Active Learning, Discussion (Teaching Technique), Teaching Models, Rote Learning, Instructional Innovation
ISSN: 2325-3290
Abstract: Postcolonial critics Paulo Freire (1921-1997) and Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak (1942-) have both made attempts at offering pedagogical formulas that take into account the student's experiences in order to oust oppressive tendencies from the classroom, and at first glance, many of their ideas seem close to identical: Freire speaks dismissively of "banking" education (75), and Spivak rejects rote learning ("Righting" 551); Freire argues that a reconciliation of the teacher-student contradiction is a prerequisite for proper education (all participants need to be "teachers and students" simultaneously [53]), and Spivak exhorts the educator to "learn to learn from below" (548). In other words, both scholars advocate a pedagogy whose "very legitimacy lies in…dialogue" (Freire 109), and they both undertake what this text labels a methodological leap from theory to practice. The aim of this article, then, is to find out how or to what extent Freire and Spivak render their pedagogical theories practicable and whether they manage to circumvent the danger of transference, of imposing the educator's agenda on the learner. The article's response to this question is no, in Freire's case, and yes, but only provisionally, in Spivak's. When Freire puts his teacher in charge of deciding what voices in the classroom should be heard and what voices should be gagged, he leaves the door open for renewed oppression and a mere turning of the tables, clearly against the grain of his own line of argument. Spivak, on the other hand, leaves no loopholes for oppressive tendencies in her methodology; however, as she usually shuns "the production of models [of practice] as such," withdraws her own formulas, and uses deconstruction as a "safeguard against the repression or exclusion of 'alterities," her settling for a certain praxis can only be temporary and provisional ("Can the Subaltern" 103, Norton 2110).
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2024
Accession Number: EJ1434281
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1434281
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1434281
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: The (Im)Possibility of Education: Theory and Method in Paolo Freire's 'Pedagogy of the Oppressed' and Gayatri Spivak's 'Righting Wrongs'
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Fredrik+Svensson%22">Fredrik Svensson</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Dialogic+Pedagogy%22"><i>Dialogic Pedagogy</i></searchLink>. 2024 12(1):A1-A15.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: University Library System, University of Pittsburgh. 3960 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15260. Tel: 302-831-1266; 302-831-4441; e-mail: dpjournal@pitt.edu; Web site: http://dpj.pitt.edu
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 15
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2024
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Evaluative
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teaching+Methods%22">Teaching Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Experience%22">Student Experience</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Active+Learning%22">Active Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Discussion+%28Teaching+Technique%29%22">Discussion (Teaching Technique)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teaching+Models%22">Teaching Models</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Rote+Learning%22">Rote Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Instructional+Innovation%22">Instructional Innovation</searchLink>
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 2325-3290
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Postcolonial critics Paulo Freire (1921-1997) and Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak (1942-) have both made attempts at offering pedagogical formulas that take into account the student's experiences in order to oust oppressive tendencies from the classroom, and at first glance, many of their ideas seem close to identical: Freire speaks dismissively of "banking" education (75), and Spivak rejects rote learning ("Righting" 551); Freire argues that a reconciliation of the teacher-student contradiction is a prerequisite for proper education (all participants need to be "teachers and students" simultaneously [53]), and Spivak exhorts the educator to "learn to learn from below" (548). In other words, both scholars advocate a pedagogy whose "very legitimacy lies in…dialogue" (Freire 109), and they both undertake what this text labels a methodological leap from theory to practice. The aim of this article, then, is to find out how or to what extent Freire and Spivak render their pedagogical theories practicable and whether they manage to circumvent the danger of transference, of imposing the educator's agenda on the learner. The article's response to this question is no, in Freire's case, and yes, but only provisionally, in Spivak's. When Freire puts his teacher in charge of deciding what voices in the classroom should be heard and what voices should be gagged, he leaves the door open for renewed oppression and a mere turning of the tables, clearly against the grain of his own line of argument. Spivak, on the other hand, leaves no loopholes for oppressive tendencies in her methodology; however, as she usually shuns "the production of models [of practice] as such," withdraws her own formulas, and uses deconstruction as a "safeguard against the repression or exclusion of 'alterities," her settling for a certain praxis can only be temporary and provisional ("Can the Subaltern" 103, Norton 2110).
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2024
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1434281
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1434281
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 15
        StartPage: A1
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Teaching Methods
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Student Experience
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Active Learning
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Discussion (Teaching Technique)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Teaching Models
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Rote Learning
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Instructional Innovation
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: The (Im)Possibility of Education: Theory and Method in Paolo Freire's 'Pedagogy of the Oppressed' and Gayatri Spivak's 'Righting Wrongs'
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Fredrik Svensson
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 2024
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 2325-3290
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 12
            – Type: issue
              Value: 1
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Dialogic Pedagogy
              Type: main
ResultId 1