Competition-Based Active Learning Instruction for Drone Education
Saved in:
| Title: | Competition-Based Active Learning Instruction for Drone Education |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Pramod Abichandani (ORCID |
| Source: | Interactive Learning Environments. 2024 32(5):1795-1813. |
| Availability: | Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 19 |
| Publication Date: | 2024 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Descriptive |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Active Learning, Competition, Undergraduate Students, Aviation Technology, Aviation Mechanics, Robotics, Research Universities, STEM Education, Student Attitudes, Skill Development, Knowledge Level, Shared Resources and Services, Barriers, Teaching Methods, Engineering Education, Graduate Students |
| DOI: | 10.1080/10494820.2022.2128821 |
| ISSN: | 1049-4820 1744-5191 |
| Abstract: | This paper presents a competition-based active learning approach that prepares undergraduate students for careers in the drone industry. The competition-based learning (CBL) approach focuses on preparing students for three key drone industry requirements (1) drone assembly, testing, and validation using commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) parts, (2) simulation of drone flight missions and (3) manual and semi-autonomous drone piloting. The CBL curricular modules were developed using the Interactive-Constructive-Active-Passive (ICAP) framework of cognitive engagement. These modules immersed students in the technical challenges corresponding to the three essential drone industry requirements. The approach was implemented through fourteen (14) drone workshops that culminated in a final drone piloting competition at a STEM research university in the United States. Ninety-seven (97) students from various backgrounds with little to no prior experience in building drones participated in the competition as part of 22 teams in total. Multiple assessment methods were used to evaluate the students' progress and the perceived drone-related skills gained by the end of the workshops. Assessment methods included data from direct formative (weekly or biweekly curricular milestones), direct summative (drone piloting for multiple flight tests), indirect quantitative (Likert-style feedback survey about student perceptions), and indirect qualitative (descriptive feedback comments) tools. Direct quantitative assessments indicated that most students successfully reached the technical milestones of the workshop sessions and gained practical drone piloting skills. The indirect quantitative assessment revealed that students perceived the workshops to be a valuable experience in their drone industry skills and knowledge. Indirect qualitative analysis of the feedback comments revealed that students perceived CBL as an engaging and effective method of introducing drone technology. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2024 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1435247 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1435247 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Competition-Based Active Learning Instruction for Drone Education – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Pramod+Abichandani%22">Pramod Abichandani</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3572-4458">0000-0003-3572-4458</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Deepan+Lobo%22">Deepan Lobo</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7434-8013">0000-0002-7434-8013</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Branislav+Dimitrijevic%22">Branislav Dimitrijevic</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1259-2037">0000-0002-1259-2037</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ashish+Borgaonkar%22">Ashish Borgaonkar</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jaskirat+Sodhi%22">Jaskirat Sodhi</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Smit+Kabrawala%22">Smit Kabrawala</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Daniel+Brateris%22">Daniel Brateris</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Moshe+Kam%22">Moshe Kam</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Interactive+Learning+Environments%22"><i>Interactive Learning Environments</i></searchLink>. 2024 32(5):1795-1813. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 19 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2024 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Descriptive – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Active+Learning%22">Active Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Competition%22">Competition</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Undergraduate+Students%22">Undergraduate Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Aviation+Technology%22">Aviation Technology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Aviation+Mechanics%22">Aviation Mechanics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Robotics%22">Robotics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+Universities%22">Research Universities</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22STEM+Education%22">STEM Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Attitudes%22">Student Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Skill+Development%22">Skill Development</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Knowledge+Level%22">Knowledge Level</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Shared+Resources+and+Services%22">Shared Resources and Services</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Barriers%22">Barriers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teaching+Methods%22">Teaching Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Engineering+Education%22">Engineering Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Graduate+Students%22">Graduate Students</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1080/10494820.2022.2128821 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 1049-4820<br />1744-5191 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This paper presents a competition-based active learning approach that prepares undergraduate students for careers in the drone industry. The competition-based learning (CBL) approach focuses on preparing students for three key drone industry requirements (1) drone assembly, testing, and validation using commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) parts, (2) simulation of drone flight missions and (3) manual and semi-autonomous drone piloting. The CBL curricular modules were developed using the Interactive-Constructive-Active-Passive (ICAP) framework of cognitive engagement. These modules immersed students in the technical challenges corresponding to the three essential drone industry requirements. The approach was implemented through fourteen (14) drone workshops that culminated in a final drone piloting competition at a STEM research university in the United States. Ninety-seven (97) students from various backgrounds with little to no prior experience in building drones participated in the competition as part of 22 teams in total. Multiple assessment methods were used to evaluate the students' progress and the perceived drone-related skills gained by the end of the workshops. Assessment methods included data from direct formative (weekly or biweekly curricular milestones), direct summative (drone piloting for multiple flight tests), indirect quantitative (Likert-style feedback survey about student perceptions), and indirect qualitative (descriptive feedback comments) tools. Direct quantitative assessments indicated that most students successfully reached the technical milestones of the workshop sessions and gained practical drone piloting skills. The indirect quantitative assessment revealed that students perceived the workshops to be a valuable experience in their drone industry skills and knowledge. Indirect qualitative analysis of the feedback comments revealed that students perceived CBL as an engaging and effective method of introducing drone technology. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2024 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1435247 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1435247 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1080/10494820.2022.2128821 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 19 StartPage: 1795 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Active Learning Type: general – SubjectFull: Competition Type: general – SubjectFull: Undergraduate Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Aviation Technology Type: general – SubjectFull: Aviation Mechanics Type: general – SubjectFull: Robotics Type: general – SubjectFull: Research Universities Type: general – SubjectFull: STEM Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: Skill Development Type: general – SubjectFull: Knowledge Level Type: general – SubjectFull: Shared Resources and Services Type: general – SubjectFull: Barriers Type: general – SubjectFull: Teaching Methods Type: general – SubjectFull: Engineering Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Graduate Students Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Competition-Based Active Learning Instruction for Drone Education Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Pramod Abichandani – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Deepan Lobo – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Branislav Dimitrijevic – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ashish Borgaonkar – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Jaskirat Sodhi – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Smit Kabrawala – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Daniel Brateris – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Moshe Kam IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2024 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 1049-4820 – Type: issn-electronic Value: 1744-5191 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 32 – Type: issue Value: 5 Titles: – TitleFull: Interactive Learning Environments Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |