Beyond Omission: Analysing the Erasure of Disability and Inclusion in the Developmentally Appropriate Practices

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Beyond Omission: Analysing the Erasure of Disability and Inclusion in the Developmentally Appropriate Practices
Language: English
Authors: Jennifer Ryan Newton (ORCID 0000-0002-6823-4431), Ruby Batz (ORCID 0000-0003-2266-2462), Courtney O'Grady (ORCID 0000-0003-0489-6265), Megan Vinh (ORCID 0000-0003-4812-2878), Sheresa Boone Blanchard (ORCID 0000-0002-4205-685X)
Source: International Journal of Early Years Education. 2024 32(3):647-657.
Availability: Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 11
Publication Date: 2024
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Evaluative
Education Level: Early Childhood Education
Descriptors: Developmentally Appropriate Practices, Inclusion, Early Childhood Education, Students with Disabilities, Attitudes toward Disabilities, Equal Education, Normalization (Disabilities), Race, Critical Race Theory, Educational Change
DOI: 10.1080/09669760.2024.2343075
ISSN: 0966-9760
1469-8463
Abstract: The 4th edition of the National Association for the Education of Young Children's (NAEYC) guidelines for developmentally appropriate practice (DAP) had an opportunity to provide the field an inclusive blueprint. While there was an attempt in this edition to respond to decades of critiques (e.g. Bloch [1992]. "Critical Perspectives on the Historical Relationship Between Child Development and Early Childhood Education Research." In "Reconceptualizing the Early Childhood Curriculum: Beginning the Dialogue," edited by S. Kessler, and E. B. Swadener, 3-20. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.; Cannella [1997]. "Deconstructing Early Childhood Education: Social Justice and Revolution." New York, NY: Peter Lang.; Escayg [2019]. "Who's got the Power?": A Critical Examination of the Anti-Bias Curriculum." "International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy" 13 (1): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40723-019-0062-9.; Langford [2010]. "Critiquing Child-Centered Pedagogy to Bring Children and Early Childhood Educators Into the Center of a Democratic Pedagogy." "Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood" 11 (1): 113-127. https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2010.11.1.113.; Pérez and Saavedra [2017]. "A Call for Onto-Epistemological Diversity in Early Childhood Education and Care: Centering Global South Conceptualizations of Childhood/s." "Review of Research in Education" 41 (1): 1-29. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X16688621.; Souto-Manning and Rabadi-Raol [2018]. "(Re)Centering Quality in Early Childhood Education: Toward Intersectional Justice for Minoritized Children." "Review of Research in Education" 42 (1): 203-225. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X187595.), the new edition continues to centre dominant developmental approaches where adults hyperfocus on children's differences or individual characteristics rather than on changing educational structures and practices that promote inequity (Ferri and Bacon [2011]. "Beyond Inclusion: Disability Studies in Early Childhood Teacher Education."). The revised guidelines do not go far enough to address inequity and to give teachers and programmes tools for addressing injustice for all young children. This manuscript builds on previous critiques of DAP by explicitly addressing the exclusion of disabled children from the guidelines.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2024
Accession Number: EJ1437436
Database: ERIC
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Be the first to leave a comment!
You must be logged in first