Policymaking to the Test? How International Large-Scale Assessments (ILSAs) Influence Repetition Rates
Saved in:
| Title: | Policymaking to the Test? How International Large-Scale Assessments (ILSAs) Influence Repetition Rates |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Manuel Enrique Cardoso (ORCID |
| Source: | International Studies in Sociology of Education. 2024 33(3):275-300. |
| Availability: | Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 26 |
| Publication Date: | 2024 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Elementary Secondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Foreign Countries, International Assessment, Educational Policy, Grade Repetition, Elementary Secondary Education, Educational Sociology, Instructional Effectiveness |
| Geographic Terms: | Latin America |
| DOI: | 10.1080/09620214.2022.2090414 |
| ISSN: | 0962-0214 1747-5066 |
| Abstract: | Do international large-scale assessments influence education policy? How? Through scripts, lessons, or incentives? For some, they all produce similar outcomes. For others, different assessment data, shaped by different designs, and mediated by international organizations' (IOs) policy directives, prompt different policy decisions. For some, participation in these assessments may be linked to lower repetition rates, as per the policy scripts hypothesis inspired by world society theory. For others, assessments' comparison strategies (age vs. grade) influence repetition in participating countries, according to policy lessons or incentives hypotheses, respectively inspired by educational effectiveness research and the sociology of quantification, and particularly the notion of retroaction. Fixed-effects panel regression models of eighteen Latin American countries (1992-2017) show that participation in assessments is associated with changing repetition rates in primary and secondary, while controlling for other factors. The findings show statistically significant differences between some assessment types. The conclusions spur new questions, delineating a future agenda. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2024 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1438870 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1438870 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Policymaking to the Test? How International Large-Scale Assessments (ILSAs) Influence Repetition Rates – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Manuel+Enrique+Cardoso%22">Manuel Enrique Cardoso</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2706-9839">0000-0002-2706-9839</externalLink>) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22International+Studies+in+Sociology+of+Education%22"><i>International Studies in Sociology of Education</i></searchLink>. 2024 33(3):275-300. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 26 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2024 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Elementary+Secondary+Education%22">Elementary Secondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22International+Assessment%22">International Assessment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Policy%22">Educational Policy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grade+Repetition%22">Grade Repetition</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Elementary+Secondary+Education%22">Elementary Secondary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Sociology%22">Educational Sociology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Instructional+Effectiveness%22">Instructional Effectiveness</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Latin+America%22">Latin America</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1080/09620214.2022.2090414 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 0962-0214<br />1747-5066 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Do international large-scale assessments influence education policy? How? Through scripts, lessons, or incentives? For some, they all produce similar outcomes. For others, different assessment data, shaped by different designs, and mediated by international organizations' (IOs) policy directives, prompt different policy decisions. For some, participation in these assessments may be linked to lower repetition rates, as per the policy scripts hypothesis inspired by world society theory. For others, assessments' comparison strategies (age vs. grade) influence repetition in participating countries, according to policy lessons or incentives hypotheses, respectively inspired by educational effectiveness research and the sociology of quantification, and particularly the notion of retroaction. Fixed-effects panel regression models of eighteen Latin American countries (1992-2017) show that participation in assessments is associated with changing repetition rates in primary and secondary, while controlling for other factors. The findings show statistically significant differences between some assessment types. The conclusions spur new questions, delineating a future agenda. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2024 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1438870 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1438870 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1080/09620214.2022.2090414 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 26 StartPage: 275 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries Type: general – SubjectFull: International Assessment Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Policy Type: general – SubjectFull: Grade Repetition Type: general – SubjectFull: Elementary Secondary Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Sociology Type: general – SubjectFull: Instructional Effectiveness Type: general – SubjectFull: Latin America Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Policymaking to the Test? How International Large-Scale Assessments (ILSAs) Influence Repetition Rates Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Manuel Enrique Cardoso IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2024 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0962-0214 – Type: issn-electronic Value: 1747-5066 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 33 – Type: issue Value: 3 Titles: – TitleFull: International Studies in Sociology of Education Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |