Policymaking to the Test? How International Large-Scale Assessments (ILSAs) Influence Repetition Rates

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Policymaking to the Test? How International Large-Scale Assessments (ILSAs) Influence Repetition Rates
Language: English
Authors: Manuel Enrique Cardoso (ORCID 0000-0002-2706-9839)
Source: International Studies in Sociology of Education. 2024 33(3):275-300.
Availability: Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 26
Publication Date: 2024
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Elementary Secondary Education
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, International Assessment, Educational Policy, Grade Repetition, Elementary Secondary Education, Educational Sociology, Instructional Effectiveness
Geographic Terms: Latin America
DOI: 10.1080/09620214.2022.2090414
ISSN: 0962-0214
1747-5066
Abstract: Do international large-scale assessments influence education policy? How? Through scripts, lessons, or incentives? For some, they all produce similar outcomes. For others, different assessment data, shaped by different designs, and mediated by international organizations' (IOs) policy directives, prompt different policy decisions. For some, participation in these assessments may be linked to lower repetition rates, as per the policy scripts hypothesis inspired by world society theory. For others, assessments' comparison strategies (age vs. grade) influence repetition in participating countries, according to policy lessons or incentives hypotheses, respectively inspired by educational effectiveness research and the sociology of quantification, and particularly the notion of retroaction. Fixed-effects panel regression models of eighteen Latin American countries (1992-2017) show that participation in assessments is associated with changing repetition rates in primary and secondary, while controlling for other factors. The findings show statistically significant differences between some assessment types. The conclusions spur new questions, delineating a future agenda.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2024
Accession Number: EJ1438870
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1438870
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Policymaking to the Test? How International Large-Scale Assessments (ILSAs) Influence Repetition Rates
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Manuel+Enrique+Cardoso%22">Manuel Enrique Cardoso</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2706-9839">0000-0002-2706-9839</externalLink>)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22International+Studies+in+Sociology+of+Education%22"><i>International Studies in Sociology of Education</i></searchLink>. 2024 33(3):275-300.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 26
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2024
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Elementary+Secondary+Education%22">Elementary Secondary Education</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22International+Assessment%22">International Assessment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Policy%22">Educational Policy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grade+Repetition%22">Grade Repetition</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Elementary+Secondary+Education%22">Elementary Secondary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Sociology%22">Educational Sociology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Instructional+Effectiveness%22">Instructional Effectiveness</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Latin+America%22">Latin America</searchLink>
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1080/09620214.2022.2090414
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 0962-0214<br />1747-5066
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Do international large-scale assessments influence education policy? How? Through scripts, lessons, or incentives? For some, they all produce similar outcomes. For others, different assessment data, shaped by different designs, and mediated by international organizations' (IOs) policy directives, prompt different policy decisions. For some, participation in these assessments may be linked to lower repetition rates, as per the policy scripts hypothesis inspired by world society theory. For others, assessments' comparison strategies (age vs. grade) influence repetition in participating countries, according to policy lessons or incentives hypotheses, respectively inspired by educational effectiveness research and the sociology of quantification, and particularly the notion of retroaction. Fixed-effects panel regression models of eighteen Latin American countries (1992-2017) show that participation in assessments is associated with changing repetition rates in primary and secondary, while controlling for other factors. The findings show statistically significant differences between some assessment types. The conclusions spur new questions, delineating a future agenda.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2024
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1438870
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1438870
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/09620214.2022.2090414
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 26
        StartPage: 275
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: International Assessment
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational Policy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Grade Repetition
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Elementary Secondary Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational Sociology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Instructional Effectiveness
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Latin America
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Policymaking to the Test? How International Large-Scale Assessments (ILSAs) Influence Repetition Rates
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Manuel Enrique Cardoso
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 2024
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 0962-0214
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 1747-5066
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 33
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: International Studies in Sociology of Education
              Type: main
ResultId 1