The Conceptualisation Implies the Statistical Model: Implications for Measuring Domains of Teaching Quality

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: The Conceptualisation Implies the Statistical Model: Implications for Measuring Domains of Teaching Quality
Language: English
Authors: Mark White (ORCID 0000-0003-2394-3151), Peter A. Edelsbrunner (ORCID 0000-0001-9102-1090), Christian M. Thurn (ORCID 0000-0002-5942-3273)
Source: Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. 2024 31(3-4):254-278.
Availability: Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 25
Publication Date: 2024
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Descriptive
Descriptors: Teacher Effectiveness, Classroom Observation Techniques, Evaluation Methods, Scoring Rubrics, Comparative Testing, Formative Evaluation, Concept Formation, Coordination, Test Selection, Goodness of Fit
DOI: 10.1080/0969594X.2024.2368252
ISSN: 0969-594X
1465-329X
Abstract: Classroom observation rubrics are a widely adopted tool for measuring the quality of teaching and provide stable conceptualisations of teaching quality that facilitate empirical research. Here, we present four statistical approaches for analysing data from classroom observations: Factor analysis, Rasch modelling, latent class or profile analysis, and formative measurement models. Each statistical model conceptualises the latent variable differently, which may or may not align with the observation rubric's conceptualisation of teaching quality. We discuss the differences across these models, focusing on the alignment between the rubric's conceptualisation of teaching quality and the model's modelling of the latent variable. We discuss the need to align model selection with observation rubric so that the measured teaching quality reflects the theoretically conceptualised teaching quality.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2024
Accession Number: EJ1441005
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1441005
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: The Conceptualisation Implies the Statistical Model: Implications for Measuring Domains of Teaching Quality
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mark+White%22">Mark White</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2394-3151">0000-0003-2394-3151</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Peter+A%2E+Edelsbrunner%22">Peter A. Edelsbrunner</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9102-1090">0000-0001-9102-1090</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Christian+M%2E+Thurn%22">Christian M. Thurn</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5942-3273">0000-0002-5942-3273</externalLink>)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Assessment+in+Education%3A+Principles%2C+Policy+%26+Practice%22"><i>Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice</i></searchLink>. 2024 31(3-4):254-278.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 25
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2024
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Descriptive
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Effectiveness%22">Teacher Effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Classroom+Observation+Techniques%22">Classroom Observation Techniques</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+Methods%22">Evaluation Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scoring+Rubrics%22">Scoring Rubrics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Comparative+Testing%22">Comparative Testing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Formative+Evaluation%22">Formative Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Concept+Formation%22">Concept Formation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Coordination%22">Coordination</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Selection%22">Test Selection</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Goodness+of+Fit%22">Goodness of Fit</searchLink>
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1080/0969594X.2024.2368252
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 0969-594X<br />1465-329X
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Classroom observation rubrics are a widely adopted tool for measuring the quality of teaching and provide stable conceptualisations of teaching quality that facilitate empirical research. Here, we present four statistical approaches for analysing data from classroom observations: Factor analysis, Rasch modelling, latent class or profile analysis, and formative measurement models. Each statistical model conceptualises the latent variable differently, which may or may not align with the observation rubric's conceptualisation of teaching quality. We discuss the differences across these models, focusing on the alignment between the rubric's conceptualisation of teaching quality and the model's modelling of the latent variable. We discuss the need to align model selection with observation rubric so that the measured teaching quality reflects the theoretically conceptualised teaching quality.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2024
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1441005
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1441005
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1080/0969594X.2024.2368252
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 25
        StartPage: 254
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Teacher Effectiveness
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Classroom Observation Techniques
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Evaluation Methods
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Scoring Rubrics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Comparative Testing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Formative Evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Concept Formation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Coordination
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Test Selection
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Goodness of Fit
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: The Conceptualisation Implies the Statistical Model: Implications for Measuring Domains of Teaching Quality
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Mark White
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Peter A. Edelsbrunner
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Christian M. Thurn
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 2024
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 0969-594X
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 1465-329X
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 31
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3-4
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice
              Type: main
ResultId 1