The Conceptualisation Implies the Statistical Model: Implications for Measuring Domains of Teaching Quality
Saved in:
| Title: | The Conceptualisation Implies the Statistical Model: Implications for Measuring Domains of Teaching Quality |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Mark White (ORCID |
| Source: | Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice. 2024 31(3-4):254-278. |
| Availability: | Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 25 |
| Publication Date: | 2024 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Descriptive |
| Descriptors: | Teacher Effectiveness, Classroom Observation Techniques, Evaluation Methods, Scoring Rubrics, Comparative Testing, Formative Evaluation, Concept Formation, Coordination, Test Selection, Goodness of Fit |
| DOI: | 10.1080/0969594X.2024.2368252 |
| ISSN: | 0969-594X 1465-329X |
| Abstract: | Classroom observation rubrics are a widely adopted tool for measuring the quality of teaching and provide stable conceptualisations of teaching quality that facilitate empirical research. Here, we present four statistical approaches for analysing data from classroom observations: Factor analysis, Rasch modelling, latent class or profile analysis, and formative measurement models. Each statistical model conceptualises the latent variable differently, which may or may not align with the observation rubric's conceptualisation of teaching quality. We discuss the differences across these models, focusing on the alignment between the rubric's conceptualisation of teaching quality and the model's modelling of the latent variable. We discuss the need to align model selection with observation rubric so that the measured teaching quality reflects the theoretically conceptualised teaching quality. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2024 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1441005 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1441005 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: The Conceptualisation Implies the Statistical Model: Implications for Measuring Domains of Teaching Quality – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Mark+White%22">Mark White</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2394-3151">0000-0003-2394-3151</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Peter+A%2E+Edelsbrunner%22">Peter A. Edelsbrunner</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9102-1090">0000-0001-9102-1090</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Christian+M%2E+Thurn%22">Christian M. Thurn</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5942-3273">0000-0002-5942-3273</externalLink>) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Assessment+in+Education%3A+Principles%2C+Policy+%26+Practice%22"><i>Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice</i></searchLink>. 2024 31(3-4):254-278. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 530 Walnut Street Suite 850, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Tel: 215-625-8900; Fax: 215-207-0050; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 25 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2024 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Descriptive – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Effectiveness%22">Teacher Effectiveness</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Classroom+Observation+Techniques%22">Classroom Observation Techniques</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+Methods%22">Evaluation Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scoring+Rubrics%22">Scoring Rubrics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Comparative+Testing%22">Comparative Testing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Formative+Evaluation%22">Formative Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Concept+Formation%22">Concept Formation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Coordination%22">Coordination</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Selection%22">Test Selection</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Goodness+of+Fit%22">Goodness of Fit</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1080/0969594X.2024.2368252 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 0969-594X<br />1465-329X – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Classroom observation rubrics are a widely adopted tool for measuring the quality of teaching and provide stable conceptualisations of teaching quality that facilitate empirical research. Here, we present four statistical approaches for analysing data from classroom observations: Factor analysis, Rasch modelling, latent class or profile analysis, and formative measurement models. Each statistical model conceptualises the latent variable differently, which may or may not align with the observation rubric's conceptualisation of teaching quality. We discuss the differences across these models, focusing on the alignment between the rubric's conceptualisation of teaching quality and the model's modelling of the latent variable. We discuss the need to align model selection with observation rubric so that the measured teaching quality reflects the theoretically conceptualised teaching quality. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2024 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1441005 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1441005 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1080/0969594X.2024.2368252 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 25 StartPage: 254 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Teacher Effectiveness Type: general – SubjectFull: Classroom Observation Techniques Type: general – SubjectFull: Evaluation Methods Type: general – SubjectFull: Scoring Rubrics Type: general – SubjectFull: Comparative Testing Type: general – SubjectFull: Formative Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Concept Formation Type: general – SubjectFull: Coordination Type: general – SubjectFull: Test Selection Type: general – SubjectFull: Goodness of Fit Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: The Conceptualisation Implies the Statistical Model: Implications for Measuring Domains of Teaching Quality Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Mark White – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Peter A. Edelsbrunner – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Christian M. Thurn IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2024 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0969-594X – Type: issn-electronic Value: 1465-329X Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 31 – Type: issue Value: 3-4 Titles: – TitleFull: Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |