The Relationship between Interaction Moves during Text-Based SCMC and L2 Vocabulary Learning Efficiency
Saved in:
| Title: | The Relationship between Interaction Moves during Text-Based SCMC and L2 Vocabulary Learning Efficiency |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Leander S. Hughes (ORCID |
| Source: | Technology in Language Teaching & Learning. 2023 5(1):1-22. |
| Availability: | Castledown Publishers. Ground Level, 470 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, 3004, Australia. Tel: +61-3-7003-8355; e-mail: contact@castledown.com; Web site: https://www.castledown.com/journals/tltl |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 22 |
| Publication Date: | 2023 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, Vocabulary Development, Task Analysis, Computer Assisted Instruction, Teaching Methods, Learning Processes, Questioning Techniques, Comparative Analysis, Communicative Competence (Languages), Computer Mediated Communication, Interaction Process Analysis, Phrase Structure, Context Effect, Linguistic Theory, Undergraduate Students, English (Second Language), Educational Benefits, Foreign Countries |
| Geographic Terms: | Japan |
| ISSN: | 2652-1687 |
| Abstract: | Previous research comparing communicative to non-communicative computer-mediated tasks requiring output production found an advantage in L2 vocabulary learning efficiency in favor of the communicative task (Hughes, 2023). The present study analyzes the chat data from Hughes (2023) to determine what features of interaction may have contributed to the advantage in L2 learning efficiency. Notable features included the negotiation of meaning, paraphrasing keywords, and context-elaborative question formulation. Of these, elaborative question formulation was found to correlate most strongly with L2 learning efficiency. Furthermore, a significant difference in L2 learning efficiency was found between participants who had engaged in elaborative question formulation and those who had not in favor of those who had. Learners who had engaged in elaborative question formulation also demonstrated a marginally significant advantage in L2 learning efficiency over participants who completed the non-communicative task. The implications of these results are discussed from a cognitivist perspective. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2024 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1444044 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1444044 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1444044 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: The Relationship between Interaction Moves during Text-Based SCMC and L2 Vocabulary Learning Efficiency – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Leander+S%2E+Hughes%22">Leander S. Hughes</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8579-5989">0000-0001-8579-5989</externalLink>) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Technology+in+Language+Teaching+%26+Learning%22"><i>Technology in Language Teaching & Learning</i></searchLink>. 2023 5(1):1-22. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Castledown Publishers. Ground Level, 470 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, 3004, Australia. Tel: +61-3-7003-8355; e-mail: contact@castledown.com; Web site: https://www.castledown.com/journals/tltl – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 22 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2023 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Second+Language+Learning%22">Second Language Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Second+Language+Instruction%22">Second Language Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Vocabulary+Development%22">Vocabulary Development</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Task+Analysis%22">Task Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+Assisted+Instruction%22">Computer Assisted Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teaching+Methods%22">Teaching Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Learning+Processes%22">Learning Processes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Questioning+Techniques%22">Questioning Techniques</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Comparative+Analysis%22">Comparative Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Communicative+Competence+%28Languages%29%22">Communicative Competence (Languages)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+Mediated+Communication%22">Computer Mediated Communication</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Interaction+Process+Analysis%22">Interaction Process Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Phrase+Structure%22">Phrase Structure</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Context+Effect%22">Context Effect</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Linguistic+Theory%22">Linguistic Theory</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Undergraduate+Students%22">Undergraduate Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22English+%28Second+Language%29%22">English (Second Language)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Benefits%22">Educational Benefits</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Japan%22">Japan</searchLink> – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 2652-1687 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Previous research comparing communicative to non-communicative computer-mediated tasks requiring output production found an advantage in L2 vocabulary learning efficiency in favor of the communicative task (Hughes, 2023). The present study analyzes the chat data from Hughes (2023) to determine what features of interaction may have contributed to the advantage in L2 learning efficiency. Notable features included the negotiation of meaning, paraphrasing keywords, and context-elaborative question formulation. Of these, elaborative question formulation was found to correlate most strongly with L2 learning efficiency. Furthermore, a significant difference in L2 learning efficiency was found between participants who had engaged in elaborative question formulation and those who had not in favor of those who had. Learners who had engaged in elaborative question formulation also demonstrated a marginally significant advantage in L2 learning efficiency over participants who completed the non-communicative task. The implications of these results are discussed from a cognitivist perspective. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2024 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1444044 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1444044 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 22 StartPage: 1 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Second Language Learning Type: general – SubjectFull: Second Language Instruction Type: general – SubjectFull: Vocabulary Development Type: general – SubjectFull: Task Analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Computer Assisted Instruction Type: general – SubjectFull: Teaching Methods Type: general – SubjectFull: Learning Processes Type: general – SubjectFull: Questioning Techniques Type: general – SubjectFull: Comparative Analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Communicative Competence (Languages) Type: general – SubjectFull: Computer Mediated Communication Type: general – SubjectFull: Interaction Process Analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Phrase Structure Type: general – SubjectFull: Context Effect Type: general – SubjectFull: Linguistic Theory Type: general – SubjectFull: Undergraduate Students Type: general – SubjectFull: English (Second Language) Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Benefits Type: general – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries Type: general – SubjectFull: Japan Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: The Relationship between Interaction Moves during Text-Based SCMC and L2 Vocabulary Learning Efficiency Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Leander S. Hughes IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2023 Identifiers: – Type: issn-electronic Value: 2652-1687 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 5 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: Technology in Language Teaching & Learning Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |