Uncovering MOOC Completion: A Comparative Study of Completion Rates from Different Perspectives

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Uncovering MOOC Completion: A Comparative Study of Completion Rates from Different Perspectives
Language: English
Authors: Berkan Celik (ORCID 0000-0002-7068-8918), Kursat Cagiltay (ORCID 0000-0003-1973-7056)
Source: Open Praxis. 2024 16(3):445-456.
Availability: International Council for Open and Distance Education. Lilleakerveien 23, 0283 Oslo, Norway. Tel: +47-22-06-26-30; Fax: +47-22-06-26-31; e-mail: icde@icde.org; Web site: https://openpraxis.org/
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 12
Publication Date: 2024
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: MOOCs, Educational Attainment, Student Educational Objectives, Educational Status Comparison, Intention, Distance Education, Student Attrition, Dropouts, Educational Certificates, Developing Nations
ISSN: 1369-9997
2304-070X
Abstract: Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have received significant global attention but face substantial criticism due to their low completion rates on mainstream platforms. The purpose of this study is to compare MOOC completion rates based on three different perspectives using four MOOCs provided by BilgeIs MOOC Portal. The completion rates based on traditional completion rates, active learners, and learner intentions revealed striking disparities in favor of the completion rates based on learner intentions. Specifically, completion rates based on learner intentions significantly exceeded both the traditional calculation and the active learner assessment for four MOOCs. This outcome underscores the critical importance of contextualizing MOOC completion data. By offering a more holistic perspective, this study contributes significantly to our understanding of the progress of MOOC success, particularly in developing countries. It is worth noting that, even when analyzed from different perspectives, regardless of culture and socio-economic factors, this study also underscored that MOOC dropout remains a prevalent issue in developing countries, lending support to the existing criticisms of completion rates. Nevertheless, it suggests that the issue may not be as severe as portrayed by studies relying solely on traditional completion metrics, as alternative viewpoints reveal completion rates that are notably higher.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2024
Accession Number: EJ1446933
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1446933
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1446933
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Uncovering MOOC Completion: A Comparative Study of Completion Rates from Different Perspectives
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Berkan+Celik%22">Berkan Celik</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7068-8918">0000-0002-7068-8918</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kursat+Cagiltay%22">Kursat Cagiltay</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1973-7056">0000-0003-1973-7056</externalLink>)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Open+Praxis%22"><i>Open Praxis</i></searchLink>. 2024 16(3):445-456.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: International Council for Open and Distance Education. Lilleakerveien 23, 0283 Oslo, Norway. Tel: +47-22-06-26-30; Fax: +47-22-06-26-31; e-mail: icde@icde.org; Web site: https://openpraxis.org/
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 12
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2024
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22MOOCs%22">MOOCs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Attainment%22">Educational Attainment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Educational+Objectives%22">Student Educational Objectives</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Status+Comparison%22">Educational Status Comparison</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Intention%22">Intention</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Distance+Education%22">Distance Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Attrition%22">Student Attrition</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Dropouts%22">Dropouts</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Certificates%22">Educational Certificates</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Developing+Nations%22">Developing Nations</searchLink>
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 1369-9997<br />2304-070X
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have received significant global attention but face substantial criticism due to their low completion rates on mainstream platforms. The purpose of this study is to compare MOOC completion rates based on three different perspectives using four MOOCs provided by BilgeIs MOOC Portal. The completion rates based on traditional completion rates, active learners, and learner intentions revealed striking disparities in favor of the completion rates based on learner intentions. Specifically, completion rates based on learner intentions significantly exceeded both the traditional calculation and the active learner assessment for four MOOCs. This outcome underscores the critical importance of contextualizing MOOC completion data. By offering a more holistic perspective, this study contributes significantly to our understanding of the progress of MOOC success, particularly in developing countries. It is worth noting that, even when analyzed from different perspectives, regardless of culture and socio-economic factors, this study also underscored that MOOC dropout remains a prevalent issue in developing countries, lending support to the existing criticisms of completion rates. Nevertheless, it suggests that the issue may not be as severe as portrayed by studies relying solely on traditional completion metrics, as alternative viewpoints reveal completion rates that are notably higher.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2024
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1446933
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1446933
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 12
        StartPage: 445
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: MOOCs
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational Attainment
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Student Educational Objectives
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational Status Comparison
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Intention
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Distance Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Student Attrition
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Dropouts
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Educational Certificates
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Developing Nations
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Uncovering MOOC Completion: A Comparative Study of Completion Rates from Different Perspectives
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Berkan Celik
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Kursat Cagiltay
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 2024
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 1369-9997
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 2304-070X
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 16
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Open Praxis
              Type: main
ResultId 1