Feedback Practices in Hybrid Writing Courses: Instructor Choices about Modality and Timing
Saved in:
| Title: | Feedback Practices in Hybrid Writing Courses: Instructor Choices about Modality and Timing |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Ariel M. Goldenthal, Jessica Matthews, Courtney Adams Wooten, Brian Fitzpatrick, Lourdes Fernandez |
| Source: | Journal of Response to Writing. 2022 8(2):40-72. |
| Availability: | Journal of Response to Writing. Brigham Young University Department of Linguistics, 4064 JFSB, Provo, UT 84602. Web site: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/journalrw/ |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 34 |
| Publication Date: | 2022 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | College Faculty, College Students, Blended Learning, Feedback (Response), Teacher Response, Writing (Composition), Writing Evaluation, Writing Instruction, Writing Teachers, Evaluation Methods, Time Factors (Learning), Learning Modalities, Computer Mediated Communication |
| ISSN: | 2575-9809 |
| Abstract: | Despite a wealth of research on feedback practices in synchronous and asynchronous courses, little has been done to investigate such practices in hybrid writing pedagogy. How do instructors make choices about providing feedback when both instructional modes are operating in a course? A qualitative study conducted with 14 instructors who teach hybrid writing courses at a large state university reveals how they navigated a series of choices about providing feedback on student writing. This study shows that instructional modality, the use of a learning management system (LMS), and labor conditions influence the decisions instructors make about how and when to provide feedback, especially on low-stakes work. While there is an emerging sense of thoughtful and critical decision-making around types of feedback and modality, this study finds that instructors do not yet have an integrated strategy when using an LMS to provide feedback in hybrid courses. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2024 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1448685 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1448685 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1448685 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Feedback Practices in Hybrid Writing Courses: Instructor Choices about Modality and Timing – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ariel+M%2E+Goldenthal%22">Ariel M. Goldenthal</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jessica+Matthews%22">Jessica Matthews</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Courtney+Adams+Wooten%22">Courtney Adams Wooten</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Brian+Fitzpatrick%22">Brian Fitzpatrick</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lourdes+Fernandez%22">Lourdes Fernandez</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Journal+of+Response+to+Writing%22"><i>Journal of Response to Writing</i></searchLink>. 2022 8(2):40-72. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Journal of Response to Writing. Brigham Young University Department of Linguistics, 4064 JFSB, Provo, UT 84602. Web site: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/journalrw/ – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 34 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2022 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Faculty%22">College Faculty</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Students%22">College Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Blended+Learning%22">Blended Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Feedback+%28Response%29%22">Feedback (Response)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Response%22">Teacher Response</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+%28Composition%29%22">Writing (Composition)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+Evaluation%22">Writing Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+Instruction%22">Writing Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+Teachers%22">Writing Teachers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+Methods%22">Evaluation Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Time+Factors+%28Learning%29%22">Time Factors (Learning)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Learning+Modalities%22">Learning Modalities</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+Mediated+Communication%22">Computer Mediated Communication</searchLink> – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 2575-9809 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Despite a wealth of research on feedback practices in synchronous and asynchronous courses, little has been done to investigate such practices in hybrid writing pedagogy. How do instructors make choices about providing feedback when both instructional modes are operating in a course? A qualitative study conducted with 14 instructors who teach hybrid writing courses at a large state university reveals how they navigated a series of choices about providing feedback on student writing. This study shows that instructional modality, the use of a learning management system (LMS), and labor conditions influence the decisions instructors make about how and when to provide feedback, especially on low-stakes work. While there is an emerging sense of thoughtful and critical decision-making around types of feedback and modality, this study finds that instructors do not yet have an integrated strategy when using an LMS to provide feedback in hybrid courses. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2024 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1448685 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1448685 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 34 StartPage: 40 Subjects: – SubjectFull: College Faculty Type: general – SubjectFull: College Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Blended Learning Type: general – SubjectFull: Feedback (Response) Type: general – SubjectFull: Teacher Response Type: general – SubjectFull: Writing (Composition) Type: general – SubjectFull: Writing Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Writing Instruction Type: general – SubjectFull: Writing Teachers Type: general – SubjectFull: Evaluation Methods Type: general – SubjectFull: Time Factors (Learning) Type: general – SubjectFull: Learning Modalities Type: general – SubjectFull: Computer Mediated Communication Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Feedback Practices in Hybrid Writing Courses: Instructor Choices about Modality and Timing Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ariel M. Goldenthal – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Jessica Matthews – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Courtney Adams Wooten – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Brian Fitzpatrick – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Lourdes Fernandez IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2022 Identifiers: – Type: issn-electronic Value: 2575-9809 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 8 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Response to Writing Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |