Undergraduate Research Course Assessment Practices in a College of Agricultural and Life Sciences
Saved in:
| Title: | Undergraduate Research Course Assessment Practices in a College of Agricultural and Life Sciences |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Wendy J. Dahl, Amanda L. Ford, Allen F. Wysocki |
| Source: | NACTA Journal. 2024 68:9-15. |
| Availability: | North American Colleges and Teachers of Agriculture. 1014 6th Avenue, Huntington, WV 25701. Tel: 208-957-7001; e-mail: support@nacta.org; Web site: https://nactateachers.org/ |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 7 |
| Publication Date: | 2024 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Undergraduate Students, College Faculty, Agricultural Colleges, Agricultural Education, Biological Sciences, Student Research, Research Training, College Credits, Pass Fail Grading, Noncredit Courses, Evaluation Methods, Course Evaluation, Course Descriptions |
| Geographic Terms: | Florida |
| ISSN: | 0149-4910 |
| Abstract: | Undergraduate research experiences provide engaging learning opportunities but are often not formally assessed for gains in knowledge and skills. This study examined undergraduate research assessment practices and the implementation of a satisfactory/unsatisfactory (S/U) research course in all academic units within a college of agricultural and life sciences. During the 2013-2014 academic year, undergraduate students registered for a letter-graded research course, and faculty supervising undergraduate research experiences were surveyed regarding assessment practices. Based on survey responses, an S/U 0-3 credit research course and syllabus template were implemented. Undergraduate students were subsequently surveyed on their 2015 and 2020 fall semester research course experiences. At baseline, most students did not receive a course syllabus (87%), however, they were verbally informed of research expectations (89%). Grades were determined by attendance and participation, and these findings were confirmed by the faculty respondents. Following implementation, 58% agreed or strongly agreed that they were more likely to participate in research with a 0-credit option and that having research on their transcript was important (89%). By 2020, 64% of respondents preferred a 0-credit option. Receiving a syllabus continued to be uncommon. S/U-grading of undergraduate research may be most appropriate for participatory-based assessment; however, steps are needed to promote the 0-credit option and ensure syllabi use for transparency of course expectations and assessment criteria. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2024 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1450459 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Url: https://content.ebscohost.com/cds/retrieve?content=AQICAHj0k_4E0hTGH8RJwT4gCJyBsGNe_WN95AvKlDbXJGqwxwG_Wta6C5El9WkhuQiTdYOzAAAA4zCB4AYJKoZIhvcNAQcGoIHSMIHPAgEAMIHJBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHgYJYIZIAWUDBAEuMBEEDNIwqeBG-08uqeZtLAIBEICBm_nRF9xHXzdRmyJlakyo3lerk8u1UQIPCzWxSI6E5uWuq6SisZdud-yQvrielNkegIS6WUKT-YCDbXUopxfKn7927x7rpAhMv6ZcBIE51PG2x1W0L2tbIL_CyZRsDsE1SRktpIDBk-9VLquaGfYyjzHhbFtuWH3m98ikIuz9SCzydKuIsWWGS9SYAlKi-hNMXQ2iF0YPZlp_ruF4 Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1450459 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1450459 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Undergraduate Research Course Assessment Practices in a College of Agricultural and Life Sciences – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Wendy+J%2E+Dahl%22">Wendy J. Dahl</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Amanda+L%2E+Ford%22">Amanda L. Ford</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Allen+F%2E+Wysocki%22">Allen F. Wysocki</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22NACTA+Journal%22"><i>NACTA Journal</i></searchLink>. 2024 68:9-15. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: North American Colleges and Teachers of Agriculture. 1014 6th Avenue, Huntington, WV 25701. Tel: 208-957-7001; e-mail: support@nacta.org; Web site: https://nactateachers.org/ – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 7 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2024 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Undergraduate+Students%22">Undergraduate Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Faculty%22">College Faculty</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Agricultural+Colleges%22">Agricultural Colleges</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Agricultural+Education%22">Agricultural Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Biological+Sciences%22">Biological Sciences</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Research%22">Student Research</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+Training%22">Research Training</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Credits%22">College Credits</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Pass+Fail+Grading%22">Pass Fail Grading</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Noncredit+Courses%22">Noncredit Courses</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+Methods%22">Evaluation Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Course+Evaluation%22">Course Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Course+Descriptions%22">Course Descriptions</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Florida%22">Florida</searchLink> – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 0149-4910 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Undergraduate research experiences provide engaging learning opportunities but are often not formally assessed for gains in knowledge and skills. This study examined undergraduate research assessment practices and the implementation of a satisfactory/unsatisfactory (S/U) research course in all academic units within a college of agricultural and life sciences. During the 2013-2014 academic year, undergraduate students registered for a letter-graded research course, and faculty supervising undergraduate research experiences were surveyed regarding assessment practices. Based on survey responses, an S/U 0-3 credit research course and syllabus template were implemented. Undergraduate students were subsequently surveyed on their 2015 and 2020 fall semester research course experiences. At baseline, most students did not receive a course syllabus (87%), however, they were verbally informed of research expectations (89%). Grades were determined by attendance and participation, and these findings were confirmed by the faculty respondents. Following implementation, 58% agreed or strongly agreed that they were more likely to participate in research with a 0-credit option and that having research on their transcript was important (89%). By 2020, 64% of respondents preferred a 0-credit option. Receiving a syllabus continued to be uncommon. S/U-grading of undergraduate research may be most appropriate for participatory-based assessment; however, steps are needed to promote the 0-credit option and ensure syllabi use for transparency of course expectations and assessment criteria. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2024 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1450459 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1450459 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 7 StartPage: 9 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Undergraduate Students Type: general – SubjectFull: College Faculty Type: general – SubjectFull: Agricultural Colleges Type: general – SubjectFull: Agricultural Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Biological Sciences Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Research Type: general – SubjectFull: Research Training Type: general – SubjectFull: College Credits Type: general – SubjectFull: Pass Fail Grading Type: general – SubjectFull: Noncredit Courses Type: general – SubjectFull: Evaluation Methods Type: general – SubjectFull: Course Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Course Descriptions Type: general – SubjectFull: Florida Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Undergraduate Research Course Assessment Practices in a College of Agricultural and Life Sciences Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Wendy J. Dahl – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Amanda L. Ford – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Allen F. Wysocki IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2024 Identifiers: – Type: issn-electronic Value: 0149-4910 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 68 Titles: – TitleFull: NACTA Journal Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |