Undergraduate Student Perceptions of Cooperative Discussion Groups as a Classroom Engagement Tool
Saved in:
| Title: | Undergraduate Student Perceptions of Cooperative Discussion Groups as a Classroom Engagement Tool |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | C. Gregg, A. Bowling |
| Source: | NACTA Journal. 2023 67:139-145. |
| Availability: | North American Colleges and Teachers of Agriculture. 1014 6th Avenue, Huntington, WV 25701. Tel: 208-957-7001; e-mail: support@nacta.org; Web site: https://nactateachers.org/ |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 7 |
| Publication Date: | 2023 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Undergraduate Students, Student Attitudes, Cooperative Learning, Discussion Groups, Learner Engagement, Classroom Communication, Reflection, Prompting, Learning Processes, Instructional Materials, Prior Learning, Teaching Methods |
| ISSN: | 0149-4910 |
| Abstract: | The purpose of this project was to explore the experiences of students when facilitating class discussions through Cooperative Discussion Groups. In addition, students particularly compared their experiences within this class with their experiences in Whole Class Discussion in previous classes. Students participated in structured cooperative discussion groups and submitted three written answers to reflection prompts provided as an extra credit opportunity. Based on the written answers, select participants were then purposively sampled for semi-structured interviews. Upon data analysis, five themes arose that described what students took away from this teaching method. Among these themes include how student groups facilitated collaboration among peers, deepened understanding of course materials, and allowed students to reflect on not only their own past experiences but those of their classmates as well. The researchers encourage instructors to consider using this teaching method as they approach curricula that either includes the development of individual philosophies or class sessions where it would be valuable for students to listen to their classmates' experiences |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2024 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1450778 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Links: – Type: pdflink Url: https://content.ebscohost.com/cds/retrieve?content=AQICAHj0k_4E0hTGH8RJwT4gCJyBsGNe_WN95AvKlDbXJGqwxwF0zStxwSA-ojCvwZ54ffuEAAAA4zCB4AYJKoZIhvcNAQcGoIHSMIHPAgEAMIHJBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHgYJYIZIAWUDBAEuMBEEDC0gvBKbr0jhaCn7OwIBEICBm7b7y8pmH_iQsOD9YG60x5qnWFlSuETwCQG7gLRLM5-pYgZSRN-S8YKOlvXgh6RnFaPCyNOKUik_-GomjJ4cnRzurwxMmCja-gyzw1cu3u7ZOx9ea6XGA5TIB3Lf_Tk4B8C-WxYmlUlT__BPUOL4sq5UI6EdSQCuAa_5DVua-zMUn6Ap3SjNLHV7oL7fwNbygb2Kj3eaJUAj7juN Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1450778 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1450778 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Undergraduate Student Perceptions of Cooperative Discussion Groups as a Classroom Engagement Tool – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22C%2E+Gregg%22">C. Gregg</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22A%2E+Bowling%22">A. Bowling</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22NACTA+Journal%22"><i>NACTA Journal</i></searchLink>. 2023 67:139-145. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: North American Colleges and Teachers of Agriculture. 1014 6th Avenue, Huntington, WV 25701. Tel: 208-957-7001; e-mail: support@nacta.org; Web site: https://nactateachers.org/ – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 7 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2023 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Undergraduate+Students%22">Undergraduate Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Attitudes%22">Student Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cooperative+Learning%22">Cooperative Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Discussion+Groups%22">Discussion Groups</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Learner+Engagement%22">Learner Engagement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Classroom+Communication%22">Classroom Communication</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reflection%22">Reflection</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Prompting%22">Prompting</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Learning+Processes%22">Learning Processes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Instructional+Materials%22">Instructional Materials</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Prior+Learning%22">Prior Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teaching+Methods%22">Teaching Methods</searchLink> – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 0149-4910 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: The purpose of this project was to explore the experiences of students when facilitating class discussions through Cooperative Discussion Groups. In addition, students particularly compared their experiences within this class with their experiences in Whole Class Discussion in previous classes. Students participated in structured cooperative discussion groups and submitted three written answers to reflection prompts provided as an extra credit opportunity. Based on the written answers, select participants were then purposively sampled for semi-structured interviews. Upon data analysis, five themes arose that described what students took away from this teaching method. Among these themes include how student groups facilitated collaboration among peers, deepened understanding of course materials, and allowed students to reflect on not only their own past experiences but those of their classmates as well. The researchers encourage instructors to consider using this teaching method as they approach curricula that either includes the development of individual philosophies or class sessions where it would be valuable for students to listen to their classmates' experiences – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2024 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1450778 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1450778 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 7 StartPage: 139 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Undergraduate Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: Cooperative Learning Type: general – SubjectFull: Discussion Groups Type: general – SubjectFull: Learner Engagement Type: general – SubjectFull: Classroom Communication Type: general – SubjectFull: Reflection Type: general – SubjectFull: Prompting Type: general – SubjectFull: Learning Processes Type: general – SubjectFull: Instructional Materials Type: general – SubjectFull: Prior Learning Type: general – SubjectFull: Teaching Methods Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Undergraduate Student Perceptions of Cooperative Discussion Groups as a Classroom Engagement Tool Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: C. Gregg – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: A. Bowling IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2023 Identifiers: – Type: issn-electronic Value: 0149-4910 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 67 Titles: – TitleFull: NACTA Journal Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |