Undergraduate Student Perceptions of Cooperative Discussion Groups as a Classroom Engagement Tool

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Undergraduate Student Perceptions of Cooperative Discussion Groups as a Classroom Engagement Tool
Language: English
Authors: C. Gregg, A. Bowling
Source: NACTA Journal. 2023 67:139-145.
Availability: North American Colleges and Teachers of Agriculture. 1014 6th Avenue, Huntington, WV 25701. Tel: 208-957-7001; e-mail: support@nacta.org; Web site: https://nactateachers.org/
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 7
Publication Date: 2023
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Student Attitudes, Cooperative Learning, Discussion Groups, Learner Engagement, Classroom Communication, Reflection, Prompting, Learning Processes, Instructional Materials, Prior Learning, Teaching Methods
ISSN: 0149-4910
Abstract: The purpose of this project was to explore the experiences of students when facilitating class discussions through Cooperative Discussion Groups. In addition, students particularly compared their experiences within this class with their experiences in Whole Class Discussion in previous classes. Students participated in structured cooperative discussion groups and submitted three written answers to reflection prompts provided as an extra credit opportunity. Based on the written answers, select participants were then purposively sampled for semi-structured interviews. Upon data analysis, five themes arose that described what students took away from this teaching method. Among these themes include how student groups facilitated collaboration among peers, deepened understanding of course materials, and allowed students to reflect on not only their own past experiences but those of their classmates as well. The researchers encourage instructors to consider using this teaching method as they approach curricula that either includes the development of individual philosophies or class sessions where it would be valuable for students to listen to their classmates' experiences
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2024
Accession Number: EJ1450778
Database: ERIC
FullText Links:
  – Type: pdflink
    Url: https://content.ebscohost.com/cds/retrieve?content=AQICAHj0k_4E0hTGH8RJwT4gCJyBsGNe_WN95AvKlDbXJGqwxwF0zStxwSA-ojCvwZ54ffuEAAAA4zCB4AYJKoZIhvcNAQcGoIHSMIHPAgEAMIHJBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHgYJYIZIAWUDBAEuMBEEDC0gvBKbr0jhaCn7OwIBEICBm7b7y8pmH_iQsOD9YG60x5qnWFlSuETwCQG7gLRLM5-pYgZSRN-S8YKOlvXgh6RnFaPCyNOKUik_-GomjJ4cnRzurwxMmCja-gyzw1cu3u7ZOx9ea6XGA5TIB3Lf_Tk4B8C-WxYmlUlT__BPUOL4sq5UI6EdSQCuAa_5DVua-zMUn6Ap3SjNLHV7oL7fwNbygb2Kj3eaJUAj7juN
Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1450778
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1450778
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Undergraduate Student Perceptions of Cooperative Discussion Groups as a Classroom Engagement Tool
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22C%2E+Gregg%22">C. Gregg</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22A%2E+Bowling%22">A. Bowling</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22NACTA+Journal%22"><i>NACTA Journal</i></searchLink>. 2023 67:139-145.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: North American Colleges and Teachers of Agriculture. 1014 6th Avenue, Huntington, WV 25701. Tel: 208-957-7001; e-mail: support@nacta.org; Web site: https://nactateachers.org/
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 7
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2023
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Undergraduate+Students%22">Undergraduate Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Attitudes%22">Student Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cooperative+Learning%22">Cooperative Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Discussion+Groups%22">Discussion Groups</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Learner+Engagement%22">Learner Engagement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Classroom+Communication%22">Classroom Communication</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reflection%22">Reflection</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Prompting%22">Prompting</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Learning+Processes%22">Learning Processes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Instructional+Materials%22">Instructional Materials</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Prior+Learning%22">Prior Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teaching+Methods%22">Teaching Methods</searchLink>
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 0149-4910
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: The purpose of this project was to explore the experiences of students when facilitating class discussions through Cooperative Discussion Groups. In addition, students particularly compared their experiences within this class with their experiences in Whole Class Discussion in previous classes. Students participated in structured cooperative discussion groups and submitted three written answers to reflection prompts provided as an extra credit opportunity. Based on the written answers, select participants were then purposively sampled for semi-structured interviews. Upon data analysis, five themes arose that described what students took away from this teaching method. Among these themes include how student groups facilitated collaboration among peers, deepened understanding of course materials, and allowed students to reflect on not only their own past experiences but those of their classmates as well. The researchers encourage instructors to consider using this teaching method as they approach curricula that either includes the development of individual philosophies or class sessions where it would be valuable for students to listen to their classmates' experiences
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2024
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1450778
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1450778
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 7
        StartPage: 139
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Undergraduate Students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Student Attitudes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Cooperative Learning
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Discussion Groups
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Learner Engagement
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Classroom Communication
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Reflection
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Prompting
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Learning Processes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Instructional Materials
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Prior Learning
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Teaching Methods
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Undergraduate Student Perceptions of Cooperative Discussion Groups as a Classroom Engagement Tool
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: C. Gregg
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: A. Bowling
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 2023
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 0149-4910
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 67
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: NACTA Journal
              Type: main
ResultId 1