The Chinese Freedom Schools: Historicizing and Intersecting 'Lau' with 'Brown'
Saved in:
| Title: | The Chinese Freedom Schools: Historicizing and Intersecting 'Lau' with 'Brown' |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Trish Morita-Mullaney (ORCID |
| Source: | Language Policy. 2024 23(4):365-391. |
| Availability: | Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/ |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 27 |
| Publication Date: | 2024 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Descriptors: | Chinese Americans, Neighborhoods, Racial Integration, Busing, Educational History, Schools, Public Schools, Activism, Racism, Housing, Voting, Access to Education, Employment, Racial Discrimination, Language Attitudes, Asian Americans, News Reporting, Educational Policy, Self Concept, African Americans, Language of Instruction, English (Second Language), Chinese, Sino Tibetan Languages, Whites, Criticism, Court Litigation, Federal Legislation, Civil Rights |
| Geographic Terms: | California (San Francisco) |
| Laws, Policies and Program Identifiers: | Lau v Nichols |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s10993-024-09709-3 |
| ISSN: | 1568-4555 1573-1863 |
| Abstract: | The Chinese of Chinatown, San Francisco largely opposed the city-wide racial integration plan that would bus their children across the city beginning in 1971. Claiming that it was a violation of their language rights, a need for cultural preservation and continued autonomy from the San Francisco that had long excluded them, Chinatown instituted its own school system called the Chinese Freedom Schools. With this boycott of the public schools, the Chinese were constituted as oppositional to the aims of racial integration, searing constructions of them as being pro-White, anti-Black, and separatist. Yet, such a simplistic and binary argument omits the long history of exclusion including employment, schooling, housing, and voting discrimination as evidenced by the Chinese Exclusion Act (1882-1965), the only law to exclude a specifically named ethnolinguistic group. To historicize and understand the Chinese Freedom Schools, I analyze this phenomenon using a racial matrix where Asians have long occupied a liminal, in-between space as perpetually foreign, unassimilable, and as a suspect class. Drawing from the theories and concepts of LangCrit, raciolinguistic ideologies and Asian American studies, I examine how agents, institutions, the press, and policies imposed, assumed, or negotiated specific identities of the Chinese during the development, implementation, and dissolution of the Chinese Freedom Schools. I analyze how the Chinese were constructed as uncooperative, creating a competitive cleavage among Asians and Blacks, while dismissing the centrality of White families who largely moved out of the system, avoiding critique. Implications for language-in-education policy are proposed for Lau's 50th anniversary. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2024 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1452257 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1452257 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: The Chinese Freedom Schools: Historicizing and Intersecting 'Lau' with 'Brown' – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Trish+Morita-Mullaney%22">Trish Morita-Mullaney</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5324-500X">0000-0001-5324-500X</externalLink>) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Language+Policy%22"><i>Language Policy</i></searchLink>. 2024 23(4):365-391. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/ – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 27 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2024 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Chinese+Americans%22">Chinese Americans</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Neighborhoods%22">Neighborhoods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Racial+Integration%22">Racial Integration</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Busing%22">Busing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+History%22">Educational History</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Schools%22">Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Public+Schools%22">Public Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Activism%22">Activism</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Racism%22">Racism</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Housing%22">Housing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Voting%22">Voting</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Access+to+Education%22">Access to Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Employment%22">Employment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Racial+Discrimination%22">Racial Discrimination</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Language+Attitudes%22">Language Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Asian+Americans%22">Asian Americans</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22News+Reporting%22">News Reporting</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Policy%22">Educational Policy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Self+Concept%22">Self Concept</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22African+Americans%22">African Americans</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Language+of+Instruction%22">Language of Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22English+%28Second+Language%29%22">English (Second Language)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Chinese%22">Chinese</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Sino+Tibetan+Languages%22">Sino Tibetan Languages</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Whites%22">Whites</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Criticism%22">Criticism</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Court+Litigation%22">Court Litigation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Federal+Legislation%22">Federal Legislation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Civil+Rights%22">Civil Rights</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22California+%28San+Francisco%29%22">California (San Francisco)</searchLink> – Name: SubjectThesaurus Label: Laws, Policies and Program Identifiers Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22Lau+v+Nichols%22">Lau v Nichols</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1007/s10993-024-09709-3 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 1568-4555<br />1573-1863 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: The Chinese of Chinatown, San Francisco largely opposed the city-wide racial integration plan that would bus their children across the city beginning in 1971. Claiming that it was a violation of their language rights, a need for cultural preservation and continued autonomy from the San Francisco that had long excluded them, Chinatown instituted its own school system called the Chinese Freedom Schools. With this boycott of the public schools, the Chinese were constituted as oppositional to the aims of racial integration, searing constructions of them as being pro-White, anti-Black, and separatist. Yet, such a simplistic and binary argument omits the long history of exclusion including employment, schooling, housing, and voting discrimination as evidenced by the Chinese Exclusion Act (1882-1965), the only law to exclude a specifically named ethnolinguistic group. To historicize and understand the Chinese Freedom Schools, I analyze this phenomenon using a racial matrix where Asians have long occupied a liminal, in-between space as perpetually foreign, unassimilable, and as a suspect class. Drawing from the theories and concepts of LangCrit, raciolinguistic ideologies and Asian American studies, I examine how agents, institutions, the press, and policies imposed, assumed, or negotiated specific identities of the Chinese during the development, implementation, and dissolution of the Chinese Freedom Schools. I analyze how the Chinese were constructed as uncooperative, creating a competitive cleavage among Asians and Blacks, while dismissing the centrality of White families who largely moved out of the system, avoiding critique. Implications for language-in-education policy are proposed for Lau's 50th anniversary. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2024 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1452257 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1452257 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1007/s10993-024-09709-3 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 27 StartPage: 365 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Chinese Americans Type: general – SubjectFull: Neighborhoods Type: general – SubjectFull: Racial Integration Type: general – SubjectFull: Busing Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational History Type: general – SubjectFull: Schools Type: general – SubjectFull: Public Schools Type: general – SubjectFull: Activism Type: general – SubjectFull: Racism Type: general – SubjectFull: Housing Type: general – SubjectFull: Voting Type: general – SubjectFull: Access to Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Employment Type: general – SubjectFull: Racial Discrimination Type: general – SubjectFull: Language Attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: Asian Americans Type: general – SubjectFull: News Reporting Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Policy Type: general – SubjectFull: Self Concept Type: general – SubjectFull: African Americans Type: general – SubjectFull: Language of Instruction Type: general – SubjectFull: English (Second Language) Type: general – SubjectFull: Chinese Type: general – SubjectFull: Sino Tibetan Languages Type: general – SubjectFull: Whites Type: general – SubjectFull: Criticism Type: general – SubjectFull: Court Litigation Type: general – SubjectFull: Federal Legislation Type: general – SubjectFull: Civil Rights Type: general – SubjectFull: California (San Francisco) Type: general – SubjectFull: Lau v Nichols Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: The Chinese Freedom Schools: Historicizing and Intersecting 'Lau' with 'Brown' Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Trish Morita-Mullaney IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 12 Type: published Y: 2024 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 1568-4555 – Type: issn-electronic Value: 1573-1863 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 23 – Type: issue Value: 4 Titles: – TitleFull: Language Policy Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |