Academic Program Development: A Collaborative and Context-Sensitive Approach

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Academic Program Development: A Collaborative and Context-Sensitive Approach
Language: English
Authors: Michele A. Parker (ORCID 0000-0003-2212-8761), Tamara M. Walser (ORCID 0000-0003-4102-4351), Satlaj Dighe (ORCID 0000-0003-4765-3124)
Source: Discover Education. 2024 3.
Availability: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 15
Publication Date: 2024
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Cooperation, Context Effect, Program Development, Doctoral Programs, Research Universities, Academic Achievement, Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation, Schools of Education, Teacher Education Curriculum, Postsecondary Education as a Field of Study, Stakeholders, Attitudes, Institutional Characteristics, Community Involvement
Geographic Terms: North Carolina
DOI: 10.1007/s44217-024-00377-3
ISSN: 2731-5525
Abstract: This perspective paper describes the strategic development of evaluation and organizational learning programs focused on building core knowledge and skills at a university with high research activity. New program development allows academic leaders to introduce relevant and cutting-edge knowledge to students. Nevertheless, the program development process must be more explicit, as it faces many logistical and technical challenges. We argue that academic program development needs to be an integrated and collaborative process paying intentional attention to program needs, context, mission, student learning outcomes, and program of study. The article describes our experiences implementing these processes, explains the interrelationships between the processes, and shares our perspective on academic program development. Our story began with establishing a faculty team and conducting literature reviews to identify gaps in existing evaluation education programs. The interest surveys indicated that 46% of the respondents are interested in pursuing an advanced degree. In addition, 88% of employers and supervisors indicated their preference for a master's degree in evaluation. Forty-two percent of the respondents also pointed to a strong interest in an online program. The program team used this survey data to determine the next steps for program development. Finally, the paper contends that a collaborative stance is central to academic program development. The paper describes our approach to building solid collaborations with students, prospective employers, leadership at the department, college, and university levels, and vocational organizations. Through our program development experience, we advocate for adopting a systematic, collaborative, and context-sensitive approach to program development.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2024
Accession Number: EJ1454000
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1454000
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Academic Program Development: A Collaborative and Context-Sensitive Approach
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Michele+A%2E+Parker%22">Michele A. Parker</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2212-8761">0000-0003-2212-8761</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Tamara+M%2E+Walser%22">Tamara M. Walser</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4102-4351">0000-0003-4102-4351</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Satlaj+Dighe%22">Satlaj Dighe</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4765-3124">0000-0003-4765-3124</externalLink>)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Discover+Education%22"><i>Discover Education</i></searchLink>. 2024 3.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 15
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2024
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cooperation%22">Cooperation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Context+Effect%22">Context Effect</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Program+Development%22">Program Development</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Doctoral+Programs%22">Doctoral Programs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+Universities%22">Research Universities</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Academic+Achievement%22">Academic Achievement</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+Methods%22">Evaluation Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Program+Evaluation%22">Program Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Schools+of+Education%22">Schools of Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Education+Curriculum%22">Teacher Education Curriculum</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Postsecondary+Education+as+a+Field+of+Study%22">Postsecondary Education as a Field of Study</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Stakeholders%22">Stakeholders</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Attitudes%22">Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Institutional+Characteristics%22">Institutional Characteristics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Community+Involvement%22">Community Involvement</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22North+Carolina%22">North Carolina</searchLink>
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1007/s44217-024-00377-3
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 2731-5525
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: This perspective paper describes the strategic development of evaluation and organizational learning programs focused on building core knowledge and skills at a university with high research activity. New program development allows academic leaders to introduce relevant and cutting-edge knowledge to students. Nevertheless, the program development process must be more explicit, as it faces many logistical and technical challenges. We argue that academic program development needs to be an integrated and collaborative process paying intentional attention to program needs, context, mission, student learning outcomes, and program of study. The article describes our experiences implementing these processes, explains the interrelationships between the processes, and shares our perspective on academic program development. Our story began with establishing a faculty team and conducting literature reviews to identify gaps in existing evaluation education programs. The interest surveys indicated that 46% of the respondents are interested in pursuing an advanced degree. In addition, 88% of employers and supervisors indicated their preference for a master's degree in evaluation. Forty-two percent of the respondents also pointed to a strong interest in an online program. The program team used this survey data to determine the next steps for program development. Finally, the paper contends that a collaborative stance is central to academic program development. The paper describes our approach to building solid collaborations with students, prospective employers, leadership at the department, college, and university levels, and vocational organizations. Through our program development experience, we advocate for adopting a systematic, collaborative, and context-sensitive approach to program development.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2024
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1454000
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1454000
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1007/s44217-024-00377-3
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 15
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Cooperation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Context Effect
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Program Development
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Doctoral Programs
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Research Universities
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Academic Achievement
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Evaluation Methods
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Program Evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Schools of Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Teacher Education Curriculum
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Postsecondary Education as a Field of Study
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Stakeholders
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Attitudes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Institutional Characteristics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Community Involvement
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: North Carolina
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Academic Program Development: A Collaborative and Context-Sensitive Approach
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Michele A. Parker
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Tamara M. Walser
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Satlaj Dighe
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 2024
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 2731-5525
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Discover Education
              Type: main
ResultId 1