Clarifying Ethical Dilemmas in Using Artificial Intelligence in Research Writing: A Rapid Review
Saved in:
| Title: | Clarifying Ethical Dilemmas in Using Artificial Intelligence in Research Writing: A Rapid Review |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Ndubuisi Friday Ugwu (ORCID |
| Source: | Higher Learning Research Communications. 2024 14(2):29-47. |
| Availability: | Walden University, LLC. 100 Washington Avenue South Suite 900, Minneapolis, MN 55401. Tel: 800-925-3368; Fax: 612-338-5092; e-mail: HLRCeditor@mail.waldenu.edu; Web site: https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/hlrc/ |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 19 |
| Publication Date: | 2024 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research Information Analyses |
| Descriptors: | Research Papers (Students), Research Reports, Academic Language, Artificial Intelligence, Ethics, Integrity, Writing for Publication, University Presses, Information Policy, Plagiarism, Moral Issues, Cheating, Intellectual Property, Computer Mediated Communication |
| ISSN: | 2157-6254 |
| Abstract: | Objective: The purpose of the study was to clarify, through the lenses of experts and frontline publishers, ethical dilemmas related to the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in research writing. Method: We conducted a rapid review of expert opinions and publishers' policy statements on ethical considerations in using AI for research writing. We included articles published in journals indexed by academic databases that met the criteria. We also included the policy statements and guidelines of seven reputable publishers. Result: The use of AI in scientific writing is acceptable, contingent on addressing ethical considerations bordering on plagiarism, transparency, and disclosure. While AI should not be listed as an author or coauthor on its own, its use in the development of the work deserves acknowledgment. Authors must substantially rephrase AI-generated content in their own words, properly citing sources to avoid claims of plagiarism. Transparency regarding AI usage and oversight of AI-generated drafts are necessary, as there are risks related to inaccuracy and bias if AI is not supervised by human experts. Conclusion: AI can be deployed to support research writing, provided users carefully abide by ethical standards that uphold academic integrity. Implications: The findings offer valuable guidance for researchers, students, and emerging publishers on how AI's capabilities can be ethically and responsibly leveraged in academic writing. By establishing clear principles, the study equips these stakeholders with the means to incorporate AI judiciously into their knowledge production practices. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2024 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1454532 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1454532 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1454532 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Clarifying Ethical Dilemmas in Using Artificial Intelligence in Research Writing: A Rapid Review – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ndubuisi+Friday+Ugwu%22">Ndubuisi Friday Ugwu</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5482-9103">0000-0001-5482-9103</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Adewumi+Segun+Igbinlade%22">Adewumi Segun Igbinlade</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2196-2965">0000-0003-2196-2965</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Raphael+Ezamenyi+Ochiaka%22">Raphael Ezamenyi Ochiaka</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ugochi+Debora+Ezeani%22">Ugochi Debora Ezeani</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Nnaemeka+Chijioke+Okorie%22">Nnaemeka Chijioke Okorie</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jacob+Kehinde+Opele%22">Jacob Kehinde Opele</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5970-6636">0000-0002-5970-6636</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Toyin+Segun+Onayinka%22">Toyin Segun Onayinka</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9222-5327">0000-0001-9222-5327</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Obinna+Iroegbu%22">Obinna Iroegbu</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5884-2559">0000-0001-5884-2559</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ogechi+Kate+Onyekwere%22">Ogechi Kate Onyekwere</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Adijat+Bolanle+Adams%22">Adijat Bolanle Adams</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2752-2231">0000-0003-2752-2231</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Precious+Aigbona%22">Precious Aigbona</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5836-7553">0009-0002-5836-7553</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Folasade+Busayo+Ojobola%22">Folasade Busayo Ojobola</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3408-069x">0000-0002-3408-069x</externalLink>) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Higher+Learning+Research+Communications%22"><i>Higher Learning Research Communications</i></searchLink>. 2024 14(2):29-47. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Walden University, LLC. 100 Washington Avenue South Suite 900, Minneapolis, MN 55401. Tel: 800-925-3368; Fax: 612-338-5092; e-mail: HLRCeditor@mail.waldenu.edu; Web site: https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/hlrc/ – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 19 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2024 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research<br />Information Analyses – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+Papers+%28Students%29%22">Research Papers (Students)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Research+Reports%22">Research Reports</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Academic+Language%22">Academic Language</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Artificial+Intelligence%22">Artificial Intelligence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ethics%22">Ethics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Integrity%22">Integrity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+for+Publication%22">Writing for Publication</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22University+Presses%22">University Presses</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Information+Policy%22">Information Policy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Plagiarism%22">Plagiarism</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Moral+Issues%22">Moral Issues</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cheating%22">Cheating</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Intellectual+Property%22">Intellectual Property</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+Mediated+Communication%22">Computer Mediated Communication</searchLink> – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 2157-6254 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Objective: The purpose of the study was to clarify, through the lenses of experts and frontline publishers, ethical dilemmas related to the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in research writing. Method: We conducted a rapid review of expert opinions and publishers' policy statements on ethical considerations in using AI for research writing. We included articles published in journals indexed by academic databases that met the criteria. We also included the policy statements and guidelines of seven reputable publishers. Result: The use of AI in scientific writing is acceptable, contingent on addressing ethical considerations bordering on plagiarism, transparency, and disclosure. While AI should not be listed as an author or coauthor on its own, its use in the development of the work deserves acknowledgment. Authors must substantially rephrase AI-generated content in their own words, properly citing sources to avoid claims of plagiarism. Transparency regarding AI usage and oversight of AI-generated drafts are necessary, as there are risks related to inaccuracy and bias if AI is not supervised by human experts. Conclusion: AI can be deployed to support research writing, provided users carefully abide by ethical standards that uphold academic integrity. Implications: The findings offer valuable guidance for researchers, students, and emerging publishers on how AI's capabilities can be ethically and responsibly leveraged in academic writing. By establishing clear principles, the study equips these stakeholders with the means to incorporate AI judiciously into their knowledge production practices. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2024 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1454532 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1454532 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 19 StartPage: 29 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Research Papers (Students) Type: general – SubjectFull: Research Reports Type: general – SubjectFull: Academic Language Type: general – SubjectFull: Artificial Intelligence Type: general – SubjectFull: Ethics Type: general – SubjectFull: Integrity Type: general – SubjectFull: Writing for Publication Type: general – SubjectFull: University Presses Type: general – SubjectFull: Information Policy Type: general – SubjectFull: Plagiarism Type: general – SubjectFull: Moral Issues Type: general – SubjectFull: Cheating Type: general – SubjectFull: Intellectual Property Type: general – SubjectFull: Computer Mediated Communication Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Clarifying Ethical Dilemmas in Using Artificial Intelligence in Research Writing: A Rapid Review Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ndubuisi Friday Ugwu – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Adewumi Segun Igbinlade – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Raphael Ezamenyi Ochiaka – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ugochi Debora Ezeani – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Nnaemeka Chijioke Okorie – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Jacob Kehinde Opele – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Toyin Segun Onayinka – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Obinna Iroegbu – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ogechi Kate Onyekwere – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Adijat Bolanle Adams – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Precious Aigbona – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Folasade Busayo Ojobola IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2024 Identifiers: – Type: issn-electronic Value: 2157-6254 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 14 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: Higher Learning Research Communications Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |