Effects of Digital Reading with On-Screen Distractions: An Eye-Tracking Study
Saved in:
| Title: | Effects of Digital Reading with On-Screen Distractions: An Eye-Tracking Study |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Angelica Ronconi (ORCID |
| Source: | Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 2025 41(1). |
| Availability: | Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 17 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Eye Movements, Electronic Learning, Computer Uses in Education, Reading, Attention Control, Student Experience, Technology Uses in Education, Reading Processes, Influence of Technology, Mass Media Effects, Cognitive Processes, Difficulty Level, Reading Comprehension, College Students, Expository Writing, Science Materials, Reader Text Relationship, Short Term Memory, Foreign Countries, Prior Learning |
| Geographic Terms: | Italy |
| DOI: | 10.1111/jcal.13106 |
| ISSN: | 0266-4909 1365-2729 |
| Abstract: | Background: During digital reading on internet-connected devices, students may be exposed to a variety of on-screen distractions. Learning by reading can therefore become a fragmented experience with potentially negative consequences for reading processes and outcomes. Objectives: This study investigated the effects of on-screen distractions, as advertisements and social media notifications, during reading on text processing, perception of cognitive load and text comprehension. Methods: University students (N = 54) participated in a within-participant design. They read two digital science expository texts, one with and the other without distractions. Participants' eye movements were recorded during reading. Process variables were the first-pass fixation time on text areas and the fixation time on distractions. Working memory was taken into account as possible moderator of outcome variables, while controlling for prior knowledge and text topic. Results: Participants spent very short time fixating the distractions. From linear mixed models the main effect of distractions did not emerge for the immediate text processing. Perception of cognitive load and text comprehension were not affected by distractions either. Among individual differences, prior knowledge contributed to text comprehension. Text topic contributed to the perception of cognitive load. Takeaways: The study suggests that simple, static and very usual on-screen distractions during reading do not seem particularly harmful for university students' processing and comprehension of expository texts. Findings indicate the importance of students' top-down attentional control over on-screen distractions not to impair their own comprehension of complex content. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2025 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1459008 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1459008 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Effects of Digital Reading with On-Screen Distractions: An Eye-Tracking Study – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Angelica+Ronconi%22">Angelica Ronconi</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8944-8765">0000-0001-8944-8765</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lucia+Mason%22">Lucia Mason</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7134-0510">0000-0001-7134-0510</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Lucia+Manzione%22">Lucia Manzione</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9161-4785">0000-0001-9161-4785</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Anne+Schüler%22">Anne Schüler</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8799-5028">0000-0001-8799-5028</externalLink>) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Journal+of+Computer+Assisted+Learning%22"><i>Journal of Computer Assisted Learning</i></searchLink>. 2025 41(1). – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 17 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Eye+Movements%22">Eye Movements</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Electronic+Learning%22">Electronic Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+Uses+in+Education%22">Computer Uses in Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reading%22">Reading</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Attention+Control%22">Attention Control</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Experience%22">Student Experience</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Technology+Uses+in+Education%22">Technology Uses in Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reading+Processes%22">Reading Processes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Influence+of+Technology%22">Influence of Technology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mass+Media+Effects%22">Mass Media Effects</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognitive+Processes%22">Cognitive Processes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Difficulty+Level%22">Difficulty Level</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reading+Comprehension%22">Reading Comprehension</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Students%22">College Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Expository+Writing%22">Expository Writing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Science+Materials%22">Science Materials</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Reader+Text+Relationship%22">Reader Text Relationship</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Short+Term+Memory%22">Short Term Memory</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Prior+Learning%22">Prior Learning</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Italy%22">Italy</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1111/jcal.13106 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 0266-4909<br />1365-2729 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Background: During digital reading on internet-connected devices, students may be exposed to a variety of on-screen distractions. Learning by reading can therefore become a fragmented experience with potentially negative consequences for reading processes and outcomes. Objectives: This study investigated the effects of on-screen distractions, as advertisements and social media notifications, during reading on text processing, perception of cognitive load and text comprehension. Methods: University students (N = 54) participated in a within-participant design. They read two digital science expository texts, one with and the other without distractions. Participants' eye movements were recorded during reading. Process variables were the first-pass fixation time on text areas and the fixation time on distractions. Working memory was taken into account as possible moderator of outcome variables, while controlling for prior knowledge and text topic. Results: Participants spent very short time fixating the distractions. From linear mixed models the main effect of distractions did not emerge for the immediate text processing. Perception of cognitive load and text comprehension were not affected by distractions either. Among individual differences, prior knowledge contributed to text comprehension. Text topic contributed to the perception of cognitive load. Takeaways: The study suggests that simple, static and very usual on-screen distractions during reading do not seem particularly harmful for university students' processing and comprehension of expository texts. Findings indicate the importance of students' top-down attentional control over on-screen distractions not to impair their own comprehension of complex content. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1459008 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1459008 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1111/jcal.13106 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 17 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Eye Movements Type: general – SubjectFull: Electronic Learning Type: general – SubjectFull: Computer Uses in Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Reading Type: general – SubjectFull: Attention Control Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Experience Type: general – SubjectFull: Technology Uses in Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Reading Processes Type: general – SubjectFull: Influence of Technology Type: general – SubjectFull: Mass Media Effects Type: general – SubjectFull: Cognitive Processes Type: general – SubjectFull: Difficulty Level Type: general – SubjectFull: Reading Comprehension Type: general – SubjectFull: College Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Expository Writing Type: general – SubjectFull: Science Materials Type: general – SubjectFull: Reader Text Relationship Type: general – SubjectFull: Short Term Memory Type: general – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries Type: general – SubjectFull: Prior Learning Type: general – SubjectFull: Italy Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Effects of Digital Reading with On-Screen Distractions: An Eye-Tracking Study Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Angelica Ronconi – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Lucia Mason – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Lucia Manzione – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Anne Schüler IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 02 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0266-4909 – Type: issn-electronic Value: 1365-2729 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 41 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Computer Assisted Learning Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |