Unlocking Augmented Reality Learning Design Based on Evidence from Empirical Cognitive Load Studies--A Systematic Literature Review
Saved in:
| Title: | Unlocking Augmented Reality Learning Design Based on Evidence from Empirical Cognitive Load Studies--A Systematic Literature Review |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Jana Gonnermann-Müller (ORCID |
| Source: | Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 2025 41(1). |
| Availability: | Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 25 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Information Analyses |
| Descriptors: | Computer Simulation, Computer Assisted Design, Difficulty Level, Cognitive Processes, Learning Strategies, Evidence Based Practice, Spatial Ability, Man Machine Systems, Context Effect, Curriculum Development |
| DOI: | 10.1111/jcal.13095 |
| ISSN: | 0266-4909 1365-2729 |
| Abstract: | Background: Despite the numerous positive effects of augmented reality (AR) on learning, previous research has shown ambiguous results regarding the cognitive demand on the learner arising from, for example, the overlay of virtual elements or novel interaction techniques. At the same time, the number of evidence-based guidelines on designing AR is limited or focuses on global effects, primarily relying on media comparison studies, whose validity is criticised. Objective: To guide the meaningful design of learning and training settings, this paper systematically reviews empirical research on AR design and synthesises the findings to develop evidence-based recommendations for designing AR systems considering cognitive load. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review, initially screening 810 distinct papers and ultimately analysing findings from 27 publications, which report on 29 distinct experimental studies. This selection was based on rigorously defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, adhering to the PRISMA guidelines. Results and Conclusion: The central value of this paper is the aggregation of existing evidence from empirical studies, resulting in 15 recommendations for AR design based on six design dimensions: Spatiality-related, Interaction-related, Contextuality-related, Content-related, Guidance-related and Display Selection. Additionally, with three points for future research, this systematic literature review, first, stresses the need for more empirical evidence and value-added studies. Second, learner characteristics that might influence cognitive load in AR-based learning should be examined. Third, it advocates for the inclusion of measurements beyond the NASA-TLX, and including more physiological measurements (e.g., eye-tracking, EEG) to enhance the applicability of the results for learning and training situations. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Notes: | https://osf.io/u9rt7/?view_only=d6c4d503d593433386a84fe20c8db12c |
| Entry Date: | 2025 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1459025 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1459025 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Unlocking Augmented Reality Learning Design Based on Evidence from Empirical Cognitive Load Studies--A Systematic Literature Review – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jana+Gonnermann-Müller%22">Jana Gonnermann-Müller</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0313-3779">0000-0002-0313-3779</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jule+M%2E+Krüger%22">Jule M. Krüger</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1141-8803">0000-0002-1141-8803</externalLink>) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Journal+of+Computer+Assisted+Learning%22"><i>Journal of Computer Assisted Learning</i></searchLink>. 2025 41(1). – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 25 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Information Analyses – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+Simulation%22">Computer Simulation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+Assisted+Design%22">Computer Assisted Design</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Difficulty+Level%22">Difficulty Level</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Cognitive+Processes%22">Cognitive Processes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Learning+Strategies%22">Learning Strategies</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evidence+Based+Practice%22">Evidence Based Practice</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Spatial+Ability%22">Spatial Ability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Man+Machine+Systems%22">Man Machine Systems</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Context+Effect%22">Context Effect</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Curriculum+Development%22">Curriculum Development</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1111/jcal.13095 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 0266-4909<br />1365-2729 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Background: Despite the numerous positive effects of augmented reality (AR) on learning, previous research has shown ambiguous results regarding the cognitive demand on the learner arising from, for example, the overlay of virtual elements or novel interaction techniques. At the same time, the number of evidence-based guidelines on designing AR is limited or focuses on global effects, primarily relying on media comparison studies, whose validity is criticised. Objective: To guide the meaningful design of learning and training settings, this paper systematically reviews empirical research on AR design and synthesises the findings to develop evidence-based recommendations for designing AR systems considering cognitive load. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review, initially screening 810 distinct papers and ultimately analysing findings from 27 publications, which report on 29 distinct experimental studies. This selection was based on rigorously defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, adhering to the PRISMA guidelines. Results and Conclusion: The central value of this paper is the aggregation of existing evidence from empirical studies, resulting in 15 recommendations for AR design based on six design dimensions: Spatiality-related, Interaction-related, Contextuality-related, Content-related, Guidance-related and Display Selection. Additionally, with three points for future research, this systematic literature review, first, stresses the need for more empirical evidence and value-added studies. Second, learner characteristics that might influence cognitive load in AR-based learning should be examined. Third, it advocates for the inclusion of measurements beyond the NASA-TLX, and including more physiological measurements (e.g., eye-tracking, EEG) to enhance the applicability of the results for learning and training situations. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: Note Label: Notes Group: Note Data: https://osf.io/u9rt7/?view_only=d6c4d503d593433386a84fe20c8db12c – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1459025 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1459025 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1111/jcal.13095 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 25 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Computer Simulation Type: general – SubjectFull: Computer Assisted Design Type: general – SubjectFull: Difficulty Level Type: general – SubjectFull: Cognitive Processes Type: general – SubjectFull: Learning Strategies Type: general – SubjectFull: Evidence Based Practice Type: general – SubjectFull: Spatial Ability Type: general – SubjectFull: Man Machine Systems Type: general – SubjectFull: Context Effect Type: general – SubjectFull: Curriculum Development Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Unlocking Augmented Reality Learning Design Based on Evidence from Empirical Cognitive Load Studies--A Systematic Literature Review Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Jana Gonnermann-Müller – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Jule M. Krüger IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 02 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 0266-4909 – Type: issn-electronic Value: 1365-2729 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 41 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Computer Assisted Learning Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |