Validity, Reliability, and Fairness Evidence for the JD-Next Exam. Research Report. ETS RR-24-04
Saved in:
| Title: | Validity, Reliability, and Fairness Evidence for the JD-Next Exam. Research Report. ETS RR-24-04 |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Steven Holtzman, Jonathan Steinberg, Jonathan Weeks, Christopher Robertson, Jessica Findley, David Klieger |
| Source: | ETS Research Report Series. Dec 2024. |
| Availability: | ETS. Rosedale Road, Mailstop 19R, Princeton, NJ 08541. Tel: 609-921-9000; Fax: 609-734-5410; e-mail: RDweb@ets.org; Web site: https://www.ets.org/ |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 19 |
| Publication Date: | 2024 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Law Schools, College Applicants, Legal Education (Professions), College Entrance Examinations, Alternative Assessment, Evaluation Criteria, Admission Criteria, Test Reliability, Test Validity, Test Bias, Culture Fair Tests, Transitional Programs, Scoring Rubrics, Scoring Formulas |
| ISSN: | 2330-8516 |
| Abstract: | At a time when institutions of higher education are exploring alternatives to traditional admissions testing, institutions are also seeking to better support students and prepare them for academic success. Under such an engaged model, one may seek to measure not just the accumulated knowledge and skills that students would bring to a new academic program but also their ability to grow and learn through the academic program. To help prepare students for law school before they matriculate, the JD-Next is a fully online, noncredit, 7- to 10-week course to train potential juris doctor students in case reading and analysis skills. This study builds on the work presented for previous JD-Next cohorts by introducing new scoring and reliability estimation methodologies based on a recent redesign of the assessment for the 2021 cohort, and it presents updated validity and fairness findings using first-year grades, rather than merely first-semester grades as in prior cohorts. Results support the claim that the JD-Next exam is reliable and valid for predicting law school success, providing a statistically significant increase in predictive power over baseline models, including entrance exam scores and grade point averages. In terms of fairness across racial and ethnic groups, smaller score disparities are found with JD-Next than with traditional admissions assessments, and the assessment is shown to be equally predictive for students from underrepresented minority groups and for first-generation students. These findings, in conjunction with those from previous research, support the use of the JD-Next exam for both preparing and admitting future law school students. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2025 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1459594 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1459594 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1459594 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Validity, Reliability, and Fairness Evidence for the JD-Next Exam. Research Report. ETS RR-24-04 – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Steven+Holtzman%22">Steven Holtzman</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jonathan+Steinberg%22">Jonathan Steinberg</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jonathan+Weeks%22">Jonathan Weeks</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Christopher+Robertson%22">Christopher Robertson</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Jessica+Findley%22">Jessica Findley</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22David+Klieger%22">David Klieger</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22ETS+Research+Report+Series%22"><i>ETS Research Report Series</i></searchLink>. Dec 2024. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: ETS. Rosedale Road, Mailstop 19R, Princeton, NJ 08541. Tel: 609-921-9000; Fax: 609-734-5410; e-mail: RDweb@ets.org; Web site: https://www.ets.org/ – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 19 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2024 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Law+Schools%22">Law Schools</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Applicants%22">College Applicants</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Legal+Education+%28Professions%29%22">Legal Education (Professions)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Entrance+Examinations%22">College Entrance Examinations</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Alternative+Assessment%22">Alternative Assessment</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+Criteria%22">Evaluation Criteria</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Admission+Criteria%22">Admission Criteria</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Reliability%22">Test Reliability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Validity%22">Test Validity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Bias%22">Test Bias</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Culture+Fair+Tests%22">Culture Fair Tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Transitional+Programs%22">Transitional Programs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scoring+Rubrics%22">Scoring Rubrics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scoring+Formulas%22">Scoring Formulas</searchLink> – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 2330-8516 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: At a time when institutions of higher education are exploring alternatives to traditional admissions testing, institutions are also seeking to better support students and prepare them for academic success. Under such an engaged model, one may seek to measure not just the accumulated knowledge and skills that students would bring to a new academic program but also their ability to grow and learn through the academic program. To help prepare students for law school before they matriculate, the JD-Next is a fully online, noncredit, 7- to 10-week course to train potential juris doctor students in case reading and analysis skills. This study builds on the work presented for previous JD-Next cohorts by introducing new scoring and reliability estimation methodologies based on a recent redesign of the assessment for the 2021 cohort, and it presents updated validity and fairness findings using first-year grades, rather than merely first-semester grades as in prior cohorts. Results support the claim that the JD-Next exam is reliable and valid for predicting law school success, providing a statistically significant increase in predictive power over baseline models, including entrance exam scores and grade point averages. In terms of fairness across racial and ethnic groups, smaller score disparities are found with JD-Next than with traditional admissions assessments, and the assessment is shown to be equally predictive for students from underrepresented minority groups and for first-generation students. These findings, in conjunction with those from previous research, support the use of the JD-Next exam for both preparing and admitting future law school students. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1459594 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1459594 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 19 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Law Schools Type: general – SubjectFull: College Applicants Type: general – SubjectFull: Legal Education (Professions) Type: general – SubjectFull: College Entrance Examinations Type: general – SubjectFull: Alternative Assessment Type: general – SubjectFull: Evaluation Criteria Type: general – SubjectFull: Admission Criteria Type: general – SubjectFull: Test Reliability Type: general – SubjectFull: Test Validity Type: general – SubjectFull: Test Bias Type: general – SubjectFull: Culture Fair Tests Type: general – SubjectFull: Transitional Programs Type: general – SubjectFull: Scoring Rubrics Type: general – SubjectFull: Scoring Formulas Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Validity, Reliability, and Fairness Evidence for the JD-Next Exam. Research Report. ETS RR-24-04 Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Steven Holtzman – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Jonathan Steinberg – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Jonathan Weeks – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Christopher Robertson – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Jessica Findley – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: David Klieger IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 12 Type: published Y: 2024 Identifiers: – Type: issn-electronic Value: 2330-8516 Titles: – TitleFull: ETS Research Report Series Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |