A Survey of Exam Methods in College A&P Courses

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: A Survey of Exam Methods in College A&P Courses
Language: English
Authors: Benjamin L. Wiggins, Gregory J. Crowther
Source: HAPS Educator. 2024 28(3):24-44.
Availability: Human Anatomy and Physiology Society. PO Box 2945, LeGrange, GA 30421. e-mail: editor@hapsconnect.org; Web site: https://www.hapsweb.org/page/hapsed_home
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 21
Publication Date: 2024
Sponsoring Agency: National Science Foundation (NSF)
Contract Number: 2412708
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Tests/Questionnaires
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Tests, Advanced Placement Programs, STEM Education, Student Evaluation, Anatomy, Physiology, College Faculty, Testing, Evaluation Methods, Grades (Scholastic), Teacher Attitudes, College Students, Barriers, Teacher Student Relationship, Test Preparation, Test Content, Feedback (Response)
ISSN: 2473-3792
2473-3806
Abstract: Exams are a form of assessment that is ubiquitous in college STEM classrooms yet is infrequently studied from the experiential perspectives of instructors or students. To better understand the forms, methods, and experiences of college STEM exams, we conducted survey-based research with instructors in anatomy and physiology courses, a well-defined and popular subset of STEM courses. We used a combination of qualitative and quantitative questions to learn about exam methods in the classrooms of 63 instructors, through which many thousands of exam-student interactions happen each year. Our data suggest that exams are a significant, possibly onerous undertaking for instructors, including many forms of optional support for students, and that they have an outsized impact on students' grades (and thus their persistence towards STEM careers). Instructors' survey responses imply that sustainability of the methods they use for assessment is a key and pressing concern in their professional lives. This need for sustainability may lead to tradeoffs that impact students, such as decreasing the transparency of the exam experience, sometimes to an extent that exams may be perceived as highly secretive. The feasibility of instructors accommodating students' absences and of students challenging instructors' grading are discussed as exemplars of the complex communication that, for better or worse, is central to student-instructor relationships and the outcomes of STEM classrooms.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2025
Accession Number: EJ1459727
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1459727
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1459727
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: A Survey of Exam Methods in College A&P Courses
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Benjamin+L%2E+Wiggins%22">Benjamin L. Wiggins</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gregory+J%2E+Crowther%22">Gregory J. Crowther</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22HAPS+Educator%22"><i>HAPS Educator</i></searchLink>. 2024 28(3):24-44.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: Human Anatomy and Physiology Society. PO Box 2945, LeGrange, GA 30421. e-mail: editor@hapsconnect.org; Web site: https://www.hapsweb.org/page/hapsed_home
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 21
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2024
– Name: SourceSuprt
  Label: Sponsoring Agency
  Group: SrcSuprt
  Data: National Science Foundation (NSF)
– Name: NumberContract
  Label: Contract Number
  Group: NumCntrct
  Data: 2412708
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research<br />Tests/Questionnaires
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Tests%22">Tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Advanced+Placement+Programs%22">Advanced Placement Programs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22STEM+Education%22">STEM Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Evaluation%22">Student Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Anatomy%22">Anatomy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Physiology%22">Physiology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Faculty%22">College Faculty</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Testing%22">Testing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+Methods%22">Evaluation Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grades+%28Scholastic%29%22">Grades (Scholastic)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Attitudes%22">Teacher Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Students%22">College Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Barriers%22">Barriers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Student+Relationship%22">Teacher Student Relationship</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Preparation%22">Test Preparation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Content%22">Test Content</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Feedback+%28Response%29%22">Feedback (Response)</searchLink>
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 2473-3792<br />2473-3806
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Exams are a form of assessment that is ubiquitous in college STEM classrooms yet is infrequently studied from the experiential perspectives of instructors or students. To better understand the forms, methods, and experiences of college STEM exams, we conducted survey-based research with instructors in anatomy and physiology courses, a well-defined and popular subset of STEM courses. We used a combination of qualitative and quantitative questions to learn about exam methods in the classrooms of 63 instructors, through which many thousands of exam-student interactions happen each year. Our data suggest that exams are a significant, possibly onerous undertaking for instructors, including many forms of optional support for students, and that they have an outsized impact on students' grades (and thus their persistence towards STEM careers). Instructors' survey responses imply that sustainability of the methods they use for assessment is a key and pressing concern in their professional lives. This need for sustainability may lead to tradeoffs that impact students, such as decreasing the transparency of the exam experience, sometimes to an extent that exams may be perceived as highly secretive. The feasibility of instructors accommodating students' absences and of students challenging instructors' grading are discussed as exemplars of the complex communication that, for better or worse, is central to student-instructor relationships and the outcomes of STEM classrooms.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2025
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1459727
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1459727
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 21
        StartPage: 24
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Tests
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Advanced Placement Programs
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: STEM Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Student Evaluation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Anatomy
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Physiology
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: College Faculty
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Testing
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Evaluation Methods
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Grades (Scholastic)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Teacher Attitudes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: College Students
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Barriers
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Teacher Student Relationship
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Test Preparation
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Test Content
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Feedback (Response)
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: A Survey of Exam Methods in College A&P Courses
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Benjamin L. Wiggins
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Gregory J. Crowther
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 2024
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-print
              Value: 2473-3792
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 2473-3806
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 28
            – Type: issue
              Value: 3
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: HAPS Educator
              Type: main
ResultId 1