A Survey of Exam Methods in College A&P Courses
Saved in:
| Title: | A Survey of Exam Methods in College A&P Courses |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Benjamin L. Wiggins, Gregory J. Crowther |
| Source: | HAPS Educator. 2024 28(3):24-44. |
| Availability: | Human Anatomy and Physiology Society. PO Box 2945, LeGrange, GA 30421. e-mail: editor@hapsconnect.org; Web site: https://www.hapsweb.org/page/hapsed_home |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 21 |
| Publication Date: | 2024 |
| Sponsoring Agency: | National Science Foundation (NSF) |
| Contract Number: | 2412708 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research Tests/Questionnaires |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Tests, Advanced Placement Programs, STEM Education, Student Evaluation, Anatomy, Physiology, College Faculty, Testing, Evaluation Methods, Grades (Scholastic), Teacher Attitudes, College Students, Barriers, Teacher Student Relationship, Test Preparation, Test Content, Feedback (Response) |
| ISSN: | 2473-3792 2473-3806 |
| Abstract: | Exams are a form of assessment that is ubiquitous in college STEM classrooms yet is infrequently studied from the experiential perspectives of instructors or students. To better understand the forms, methods, and experiences of college STEM exams, we conducted survey-based research with instructors in anatomy and physiology courses, a well-defined and popular subset of STEM courses. We used a combination of qualitative and quantitative questions to learn about exam methods in the classrooms of 63 instructors, through which many thousands of exam-student interactions happen each year. Our data suggest that exams are a significant, possibly onerous undertaking for instructors, including many forms of optional support for students, and that they have an outsized impact on students' grades (and thus their persistence towards STEM careers). Instructors' survey responses imply that sustainability of the methods they use for assessment is a key and pressing concern in their professional lives. This need for sustainability may lead to tradeoffs that impact students, such as decreasing the transparency of the exam experience, sometimes to an extent that exams may be perceived as highly secretive. The feasibility of instructors accommodating students' absences and of students challenging instructors' grading are discussed as exemplars of the complex communication that, for better or worse, is central to student-instructor relationships and the outcomes of STEM classrooms. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2025 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1459727 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1459727 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1459727 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: A Survey of Exam Methods in College A&P Courses – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Benjamin+L%2E+Wiggins%22">Benjamin L. Wiggins</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Gregory+J%2E+Crowther%22">Gregory J. Crowther</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22HAPS+Educator%22"><i>HAPS Educator</i></searchLink>. 2024 28(3):24-44. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Human Anatomy and Physiology Society. PO Box 2945, LeGrange, GA 30421. e-mail: editor@hapsconnect.org; Web site: https://www.hapsweb.org/page/hapsed_home – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 21 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2024 – Name: SourceSuprt Label: Sponsoring Agency Group: SrcSuprt Data: National Science Foundation (NSF) – Name: NumberContract Label: Contract Number Group: NumCntrct Data: 2412708 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research<br />Tests/Questionnaires – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Tests%22">Tests</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Advanced+Placement+Programs%22">Advanced Placement Programs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22STEM+Education%22">STEM Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Evaluation%22">Student Evaluation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Anatomy%22">Anatomy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Physiology%22">Physiology</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Faculty%22">College Faculty</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Testing%22">Testing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+Methods%22">Evaluation Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Grades+%28Scholastic%29%22">Grades (Scholastic)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Attitudes%22">Teacher Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Students%22">College Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Barriers%22">Barriers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Student+Relationship%22">Teacher Student Relationship</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Preparation%22">Test Preparation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Content%22">Test Content</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Feedback+%28Response%29%22">Feedback (Response)</searchLink> – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 2473-3792<br />2473-3806 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Exams are a form of assessment that is ubiquitous in college STEM classrooms yet is infrequently studied from the experiential perspectives of instructors or students. To better understand the forms, methods, and experiences of college STEM exams, we conducted survey-based research with instructors in anatomy and physiology courses, a well-defined and popular subset of STEM courses. We used a combination of qualitative and quantitative questions to learn about exam methods in the classrooms of 63 instructors, through which many thousands of exam-student interactions happen each year. Our data suggest that exams are a significant, possibly onerous undertaking for instructors, including many forms of optional support for students, and that they have an outsized impact on students' grades (and thus their persistence towards STEM careers). Instructors' survey responses imply that sustainability of the methods they use for assessment is a key and pressing concern in their professional lives. This need for sustainability may lead to tradeoffs that impact students, such as decreasing the transparency of the exam experience, sometimes to an extent that exams may be perceived as highly secretive. The feasibility of instructors accommodating students' absences and of students challenging instructors' grading are discussed as exemplars of the complex communication that, for better or worse, is central to student-instructor relationships and the outcomes of STEM classrooms. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1459727 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1459727 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 21 StartPage: 24 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Tests Type: general – SubjectFull: Advanced Placement Programs Type: general – SubjectFull: STEM Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Evaluation Type: general – SubjectFull: Anatomy Type: general – SubjectFull: Physiology Type: general – SubjectFull: College Faculty Type: general – SubjectFull: Testing Type: general – SubjectFull: Evaluation Methods Type: general – SubjectFull: Grades (Scholastic) Type: general – SubjectFull: Teacher Attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: College Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Barriers Type: general – SubjectFull: Teacher Student Relationship Type: general – SubjectFull: Test Preparation Type: general – SubjectFull: Test Content Type: general – SubjectFull: Feedback (Response) Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: A Survey of Exam Methods in College A&P Courses Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Benjamin L. Wiggins – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Gregory J. Crowther IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2024 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 2473-3792 – Type: issn-electronic Value: 2473-3806 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 28 – Type: issue Value: 3 Titles: – TitleFull: HAPS Educator Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |