Kuhnian Perspectives in Science Education: A Comparative Review of Proponents and Skeptics
Saved in:
| Title: | Kuhnian Perspectives in Science Education: A Comparative Review of Proponents and Skeptics |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Sigit Permansah (ORCID |
| Source: | Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn). 2025 19(2):853-863. |
| Availability: | Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science. C5 Plumbon, Banguntapan, Yogyakarta, 55198, Indonesia. e-mail: edulearn@uad.ac.id; Web site: http://edulearn.intelektual.org/index.php/EduLearn/ |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 11 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Information Analyses |
| Descriptors: | Philosophy, Science Education, Scientific Concepts, Scientific Attitudes, Beliefs, Scientific Principles, Models |
| ISSN: | 2089-9823 2302-9277 |
| Abstract: | Despite the abundance of literature discussing Kuhnian views, it is rare to find studies that comprehensively compare the arguments of Kuhnian supporters and skeptics. This study aims to fill the gap by providing a comparative review and synthesis between the two groups of views using the systematic literature review (SLR) analysis technique. The researcher found 1,413 articles reduced with the standard prism protocol to 32 articles that examined Kuhn's views. Proponents support the existence of Kuhn's scientific paradigm where they not only strengthen and consider the importance of Kuhn's theory, but also expand its application to various fields, showing the flexibility and relevance of the theory in understanding the scientific revolution that occurred in various disciplines. Skeptics criticize Kuhn's views such as the ambiguity of the term "paradigm", the non-recognition of scientific revolutions that lead to scientific evolution, and the doubt of the concept of incommensurability in various disciplines. This shows that Thomas Kuhn made a great contribution to the world of scientific education because it can provoke experts to study his thoughts for the benefit of science. The findings of this study are expected to contribute to policy makers and other researchers in applying and studying Kuhn's paradigm. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2025 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1464146 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1464146 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1464146 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Kuhnian Perspectives in Science Education: A Comparative Review of Proponents and Skeptics – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sigit+Permansah%22">Sigit Permansah</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8686-4197">0000-0002-8686-4197</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Abdul+Rahman%22">Abdul Rahman</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1524-1486">0000-0002-1524-1486</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Dede+Rusmana%22">Dede Rusmana</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2477-0643">0000-0003-2477-0643</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Cicilia+Dyah+Sulistyaningrum+Indrawati%22">Cicilia Dyah Sulistyaningrum Indrawati</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6387-4755">0000-0002-6387-4755</externalLink>) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Journal+of+Education+and+Learning+%28EduLearn%29%22"><i>Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn)</i></searchLink>. 2025 19(2):853-863. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science. C5 Plumbon, Banguntapan, Yogyakarta, 55198, Indonesia. e-mail: edulearn@uad.ac.id; Web site: http://edulearn.intelektual.org/index.php/EduLearn/ – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 11 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Information Analyses – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Philosophy%22">Philosophy</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Science+Education%22">Science Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scientific+Concepts%22">Scientific Concepts</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scientific+Attitudes%22">Scientific Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Beliefs%22">Beliefs</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scientific+Principles%22">Scientific Principles</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Models%22">Models</searchLink> – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 2089-9823<br />2302-9277 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Despite the abundance of literature discussing Kuhnian views, it is rare to find studies that comprehensively compare the arguments of Kuhnian supporters and skeptics. This study aims to fill the gap by providing a comparative review and synthesis between the two groups of views using the systematic literature review (SLR) analysis technique. The researcher found 1,413 articles reduced with the standard prism protocol to 32 articles that examined Kuhn's views. Proponents support the existence of Kuhn's scientific paradigm where they not only strengthen and consider the importance of Kuhn's theory, but also expand its application to various fields, showing the flexibility and relevance of the theory in understanding the scientific revolution that occurred in various disciplines. Skeptics criticize Kuhn's views such as the ambiguity of the term "paradigm", the non-recognition of scientific revolutions that lead to scientific evolution, and the doubt of the concept of incommensurability in various disciplines. This shows that Thomas Kuhn made a great contribution to the world of scientific education because it can provoke experts to study his thoughts for the benefit of science. The findings of this study are expected to contribute to policy makers and other researchers in applying and studying Kuhn's paradigm. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1464146 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1464146 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 11 StartPage: 853 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Philosophy Type: general – SubjectFull: Science Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Scientific Concepts Type: general – SubjectFull: Scientific Attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: Beliefs Type: general – SubjectFull: Scientific Principles Type: general – SubjectFull: Models Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Kuhnian Perspectives in Science Education: A Comparative Review of Proponents and Skeptics Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Sigit Permansah – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Abdul Rahman – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Dede Rusmana – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Cicilia Dyah Sulistyaningrum Indrawati IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 2089-9823 – Type: issn-electronic Value: 2302-9277 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 19 – Type: issue Value: 2 Titles: – TitleFull: Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |