Generative AI and CEFR Levels: Evaluating the Accuracy of Text Generation with ChatGPT-4o through Textual Features
Saved in:
| Title: | Generative AI and CEFR Levels: Evaluating the Accuracy of Text Generation with ChatGPT-4o through Textual Features |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Satoru Uchida (ORCID |
| Source: | Vocabulary Learning and Instruction. 2025 14(1). |
| Availability: | Castledown Publishers. Ground Level, 470 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, 3004, Australia. Tel: +61-3-7003-8355; e-mail: contact@castledown.com; Web site: https://www.castledown.com/journals/vli |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 13 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Descriptors: | Vocabulary Development, Language Proficiency, Rating Scales, Guidelines, Standards, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Software, Textbooks, Technology Integration, English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, Computational Linguistics, Text Structure, Comparative Analysis, Material Development |
| ISSN: | 2981-9954 |
| Abstract: | Since its emergence, generative AI has significantly impacted various fields, including English language education. Numerous academic studies have investigated its capabilities in grammar correction, writing evaluation, and dynamics of user interaction. However, there have been insufficient investigations into whether texts generated by such AI align appropriately with CEFR proficiency levels. This study addresses this gap by exploring the applicability of generative AI to CEFR standards. Multiple texts were generated using ChatGPT-4o with specified CEFR levels and analyzed using a vocabulary level analyzer (CVLA) to evaluate text features. The findings revealed discrepancies between AI-generated texts and textbook standards, significant divergences between levels below B1 and above B2, and a noticeable topic bias. Although AI-generated texts seem to differ by level, they require careful evaluation before being applied to CEFR-based education. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2025 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1466280 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1466280 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1466280 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Generative AI and CEFR Levels: Evaluating the Accuracy of Text Generation with ChatGPT-4o through Textual Features – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Satoru+Uchida%22">Satoru Uchida</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7779-0085">0000-0002-7779-0085</externalLink>) – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Vocabulary+Learning+and+Instruction%22"><i>Vocabulary Learning and Instruction</i></searchLink>. 2025 14(1). – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Castledown Publishers. Ground Level, 470 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, 3004, Australia. Tel: +61-3-7003-8355; e-mail: contact@castledown.com; Web site: https://www.castledown.com/journals/vli – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 13 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Vocabulary+Development%22">Vocabulary Development</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Language+Proficiency%22">Language Proficiency</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Rating+Scales%22">Rating Scales</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Guidelines%22">Guidelines</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Standards%22">Standards</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Artificial+Intelligence%22">Artificial Intelligence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+Software%22">Computer Software</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Textbooks%22">Textbooks</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Technology+Integration%22">Technology Integration</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22English+%28Second+Language%29%22">English (Second Language)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Second+Language+Learning%22">Second Language Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Second+Language+Instruction%22">Second Language Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computational+Linguistics%22">Computational Linguistics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Text+Structure%22">Text Structure</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Comparative+Analysis%22">Comparative Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Material+Development%22">Material Development</searchLink> – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 2981-9954 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: Since its emergence, generative AI has significantly impacted various fields, including English language education. Numerous academic studies have investigated its capabilities in grammar correction, writing evaluation, and dynamics of user interaction. However, there have been insufficient investigations into whether texts generated by such AI align appropriately with CEFR proficiency levels. This study addresses this gap by exploring the applicability of generative AI to CEFR standards. Multiple texts were generated using ChatGPT-4o with specified CEFR levels and analyzed using a vocabulary level analyzer (CVLA) to evaluate text features. The findings revealed discrepancies between AI-generated texts and textbook standards, significant divergences between levels below B1 and above B2, and a noticeable topic bias. Although AI-generated texts seem to differ by level, they require careful evaluation before being applied to CEFR-based education. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1466280 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1466280 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 13 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Vocabulary Development Type: general – SubjectFull: Language Proficiency Type: general – SubjectFull: Rating Scales Type: general – SubjectFull: Guidelines Type: general – SubjectFull: Standards Type: general – SubjectFull: Artificial Intelligence Type: general – SubjectFull: Computer Software Type: general – SubjectFull: Textbooks Type: general – SubjectFull: Technology Integration Type: general – SubjectFull: English (Second Language) Type: general – SubjectFull: Second Language Learning Type: general – SubjectFull: Second Language Instruction Type: general – SubjectFull: Computational Linguistics Type: general – SubjectFull: Text Structure Type: general – SubjectFull: Comparative Analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Material Development Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Generative AI and CEFR Levels: Evaluating the Accuracy of Text Generation with ChatGPT-4o through Textual Features Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Satoru Uchida IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-electronic Value: 2981-9954 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 14 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: Vocabulary Learning and Instruction Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |