Accessibility of GCSE Science Questions That Ask Students to Create and Augment Visuals: Evidence from Question Omit Rates
Saved in:
| Title: | Accessibility of GCSE Science Questions That Ask Students to Create and Augment Visuals: Evidence from Question Omit Rates |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Santi Lestari |
| Source: | Research Matters. 2025 (39):39-65. |
| Availability: | Cambridge University Press & Assessment. Shaftesbury Road Cambridge CB2 8EA. Tel: 44-1223-553311; e-mail: directcs@cambridge.org; Web site: https://www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/our-research/all-published-resources/research-matters/ |
| Peer Reviewed: | N |
| Page Count: | 28 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Secondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Science Education, Secondary Education, Visual Aids, Foreign Countries, Freehand Drawing, Test Construction, Test Items, Accessibility (for Disabled), Evaluation Methods, Testing Accommodations |
| Geographic Terms: | United Kingdom (England) |
| ISSN: | 1755-6031 |
| Abstract: | The ability to draw visual representations such as diagrams and graphs is considered fundamental to science learning. Science exams therefore often include questions which require students to draw a visual representation, or to augment a partially provided one. The design features of such questions (e.g., layout of diagrams, amount of answer space) could, however, influence students' ability to respond to the questions and present potential accessibility issues, which in turn could influence the validity of score inferences. This article reports on a small-scale study examining the accessibility of GCSE science questions involving the creation and augmentation of visuals (e.g., adding an element to a partially provided diagram) by analysing the patterns of question omit rates. Omit rates for questions involving creating or augmenting visuals were compared to those for questions without, and these comparisons were conducted across tiers, subjects, question position, maximum marks and facility values, as well as by gender and attainment group. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2025 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1467358 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1467358 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1467358 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Accessibility of GCSE Science Questions That Ask Students to Create and Augment Visuals: Evidence from Question Omit Rates – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Santi+Lestari%22">Santi Lestari</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Research+Matters%22"><i>Research Matters</i></searchLink>. 2025 (39):39-65. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Cambridge University Press & Assessment. Shaftesbury Road Cambridge CB2 8EA. Tel: 44-1223-553311; e-mail: directcs@cambridge.org; Web site: https://www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/our-research/all-published-resources/research-matters/ – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: N – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 28 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Secondary+Education%22">Secondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Science+Education%22">Science Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Secondary+Education%22">Secondary Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Visual+Aids%22">Visual Aids</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Freehand+Drawing%22">Freehand Drawing</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Construction%22">Test Construction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Items%22">Test Items</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Accessibility+%28for+Disabled%29%22">Accessibility (for Disabled)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Evaluation+Methods%22">Evaluation Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Testing+Accommodations%22">Testing Accommodations</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22United+Kingdom+%28England%29%22">United Kingdom (England)</searchLink> – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 1755-6031 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: The ability to draw visual representations such as diagrams and graphs is considered fundamental to science learning. Science exams therefore often include questions which require students to draw a visual representation, or to augment a partially provided one. The design features of such questions (e.g., layout of diagrams, amount of answer space) could, however, influence students' ability to respond to the questions and present potential accessibility issues, which in turn could influence the validity of score inferences. This article reports on a small-scale study examining the accessibility of GCSE science questions involving the creation and augmentation of visuals (e.g., adding an element to a partially provided diagram) by analysing the patterns of question omit rates. Omit rates for questions involving creating or augmenting visuals were compared to those for questions without, and these comparisons were conducted across tiers, subjects, question position, maximum marks and facility values, as well as by gender and attainment group. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1467358 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1467358 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 28 StartPage: 39 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Science Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Secondary Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Visual Aids Type: general – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries Type: general – SubjectFull: Freehand Drawing Type: general – SubjectFull: Test Construction Type: general – SubjectFull: Test Items Type: general – SubjectFull: Accessibility (for Disabled) Type: general – SubjectFull: Evaluation Methods Type: general – SubjectFull: Testing Accommodations Type: general – SubjectFull: United Kingdom (England) Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Accessibility of GCSE Science Questions That Ask Students to Create and Augment Visuals: Evidence from Question Omit Rates Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Santi Lestari IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 1755-6031 Numbering: – Type: issue Value: 39 Titles: – TitleFull: Research Matters Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |