Appearing Smart, Confident and Motivated: A Lens Model Approach to Judgment Accuracy in an Educational Setting

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Appearing Smart, Confident and Motivated: A Lens Model Approach to Judgment Accuracy in an Educational Setting
Language: English
Authors: Caroline V. Bhowmik (ORCID 0000-0003-3754-4135), Mitja D. Back, Steffen Nestler, Friedrich-Wilhelm Schrader
Source: Social Psychology of Education: An International Journal. 2025 28(1).
Availability: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 34
Publication Date: 2025
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Evaluative Thinking, Accuracy, Teacher Attitudes, College Students, Preservice Teachers, Nonverbal Communication, Cues, Student Motivation, Intelligence, Gender Differences, Assistive Technology, Student Characteristics, Gender Bias
DOI: 10.1007/s11218-025-10057-1
ISSN: 1381-2890
1573-1928
Abstract: Which behavioral and visual information do teachers rely on when judging relevant characteristics of their students and which cues should they rely on? Drawing on Brunswik's Lens Model (Perception and the representative design of psychological experiments, University of California Press, 1956. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520350519), we investigated the role of students' expression of nonverbal behavioral cues (e.g., friendly facial expression) and physical appearance (e.g., wearing eyeglasses) and how this information is utilized during the judgment process by pre-service teachers and psychology students (N = 102). Perceivers provided ratings of students' (N = 45) academic self-concept, intelligence and motivation in brief nonverbal video clips showing one student each in a physics classroom. Numerous behavioral and physical cues (in total 165) were extracted from the stimulus material by two independent raters. Perceivers achieved highest accuracy for students' motivation, whereas intelligence was judged with the lowest accuracy. Lens model parameter analysis indicated that perceivers strongly relied on students' sex, an attentive and self-assured facial expression, and whether or not a student was wearing eyeglasses in their judgments. Cues that were actually related to students' characteristics, on the other hand, involved students' sex, a masculine and distinctive appearance, and a tensed as well as friendly facial expression. An overall favorable judgment for boys points into the direction of a gender bias. Implications for our understanding of teacher judgment processes and outcomes are discussed.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2025
Accession Number: EJ1470215
Database: ERIC
Full text is not displayed to guests.
Be the first to leave a comment!
You must be logged in first