Factors Influencing Bangladeshi English Teachers' Perceptions of Academic Policy, Academic Culture and Knowledge Related to Plagiarism in Higher Education

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Factors Influencing Bangladeshi English Teachers' Perceptions of Academic Policy, Academic Culture and Knowledge Related to Plagiarism in Higher Education
Language: English
Authors: Md. Mahadhi Hasan (ORCID 0000-0003-3921-9889), Anika Sikder (ORCID 0009-0005-1993-3331), Rashed Mahmud (ORCID 0000-0003-2586-2224)
Source: Language Teaching Research Quarterly. 2025 47:20-39.
Availability: European Knowledge Development (EUROKD). e-mail: editorial@eurokd.com; Web site: https://www.eurokd.com/journal/jd/1
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 20
Publication Date: 2025
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Tests/Questionnaires
Education Level: Higher Education
Postsecondary Education
Descriptors: Language Teachers, English (Second Language), Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction, Teacher Attitudes, Teacher Surveys, College Faculty, Plagiarism, Factor Analysis, Foreign Countries, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Software, State Universities, Private Colleges, Technology Uses in Education, Identification, Writing Assignments, Ethics, Integrity, Course Descriptions, Academic Language
Geographic Terms: Bangladesh
ISSN: 2667-6753
Abstract: Some serious instances of plagiarism have been discussed in Bangladesh's institutions, where students, researchers, and even faculty members were given severe penalties. This study explores the factors influencing teachers of English at the tertiary level in Bangladesh regarding plagiarism, including emerging concerns around AI-based plagiarism. A mixed-method research design has been used to answer two research questions: (1) What are the perceptions of English teachers about plagiarism at the tertiary level? and (2) What are the factors that influence these perceptions? Data were collected through a survey questionnaire administered to 128 English teachers from 25 public and private universities in Bangladesh, followed by in-depth interviews with 10 teachers involved in research supervision. Factor analysis revealed institutional negligence, lack of writing courses, absence of plagiarism policies, and infrequent use of plagiarism detection software as major drivers of plagiarism. The thematic analysis identified concerns relating to the misuse of AI tools that escalate plagiarism and make its detection difficult. Respondents expressed the need for guidelines with respect to the ethical application of AI in academic writing. Recommendations include making writing courses mandatory, including plagiarism policies in course outline, and implementing AI-specific plagiarism detection tools to strengthen the academic integrity of higher education.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2025
Accession Number: EJ1472530
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
CustomLinks:
  – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1472530
    Name: ERIC Full Text
    Category: fullText
    Text: Full Text from ERIC
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1472530
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Factors Influencing Bangladeshi English Teachers' Perceptions of Academic Policy, Academic Culture and Knowledge Related to Plagiarism in Higher Education
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Md%2E+Mahadhi+Hasan%22">Md. Mahadhi Hasan</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3921-9889">0000-0003-3921-9889</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Anika+Sikder%22">Anika Sikder</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1993-3331">0009-0005-1993-3331</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Rashed+Mahmud%22">Rashed Mahmud</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2586-2224">0000-0003-2586-2224</externalLink>)
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Language+Teaching+Research+Quarterly%22"><i>Language Teaching Research Quarterly</i></searchLink>. 2025 47:20-39.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: European Knowledge Development (EUROKD). e-mail: editorial@eurokd.com; Web site: https://www.eurokd.com/journal/jd/1
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 20
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2025
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research<br />Tests/Questionnaires
– Name: Audience
  Label: Education Level
  Group: Audnce
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Language+Teachers%22">Language Teachers</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22English+%28Second+Language%29%22">English (Second Language)</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Second+Language+Learning%22">Second Language Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Second+Language+Instruction%22">Second Language Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Attitudes%22">Teacher Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Surveys%22">Teacher Surveys</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22College+Faculty%22">College Faculty</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Plagiarism%22">Plagiarism</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Factor+Analysis%22">Factor Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Artificial+Intelligence%22">Artificial Intelligence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Computer+Software%22">Computer Software</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22State+Universities%22">State Universities</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Private+Colleges%22">Private Colleges</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Technology+Uses+in+Education%22">Technology Uses in Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Identification%22">Identification</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Writing+Assignments%22">Writing Assignments</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ethics%22">Ethics</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Integrity%22">Integrity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Course+Descriptions%22">Course Descriptions</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Academic+Language%22">Academic Language</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Bangladesh%22">Bangladesh</searchLink>
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 2667-6753
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Some serious instances of plagiarism have been discussed in Bangladesh's institutions, where students, researchers, and even faculty members were given severe penalties. This study explores the factors influencing teachers of English at the tertiary level in Bangladesh regarding plagiarism, including emerging concerns around AI-based plagiarism. A mixed-method research design has been used to answer two research questions: (1) What are the perceptions of English teachers about plagiarism at the tertiary level? and (2) What are the factors that influence these perceptions? Data were collected through a survey questionnaire administered to 128 English teachers from 25 public and private universities in Bangladesh, followed by in-depth interviews with 10 teachers involved in research supervision. Factor analysis revealed institutional negligence, lack of writing courses, absence of plagiarism policies, and infrequent use of plagiarism detection software as major drivers of plagiarism. The thematic analysis identified concerns relating to the misuse of AI tools that escalate plagiarism and make its detection difficult. Respondents expressed the need for guidelines with respect to the ethical application of AI in academic writing. Recommendations include making writing courses mandatory, including plagiarism policies in course outline, and implementing AI-specific plagiarism detection tools to strengthen the academic integrity of higher education.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2025
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1472530
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1472530
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 20
        StartPage: 20
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: Language Teachers
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: English (Second Language)
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Second Language Learning
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Second Language Instruction
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Teacher Attitudes
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Teacher Surveys
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: College Faculty
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Plagiarism
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Factor Analysis
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Artificial Intelligence
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Computer Software
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: State Universities
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Private Colleges
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Technology Uses in Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Identification
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Writing Assignments
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Ethics
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Integrity
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Course Descriptions
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Academic Language
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Bangladesh
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Factors Influencing Bangladeshi English Teachers' Perceptions of Academic Policy, Academic Culture and Knowledge Related to Plagiarism in Higher Education
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Md. Mahadhi Hasan
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Anika Sikder
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Rashed Mahmud
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 01
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 2667-6753
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 47
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: Language Teaching Research Quarterly
              Type: main
ResultId 1