A Historic Review and Empirical Revitalization of the Stages of Concern Questionnaire
Saved in:
| Title: | A Historic Review and Empirical Revitalization of the Stages of Concern Questionnaire |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Kent Anderson Seidel |
| Source: | School Leadership Review. 2025 20(1). |
| Availability: | Texas Council of Professors of Educational Administration. Web site: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/slr/ |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 32 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Descriptors: | Questionnaires, Educational Change, Educational Innovation, Intervention, Program Implementation, Models, Decision Making, Test Reliability, Test Validity, Test Items, Item Analysis, Test Interpretation, Scores |
| Assessment and Survey Identifiers: | Stages of Concern Questionnaire |
| ISSN: | 1559-4998 |
| Abstract: | This paper examines one of three central diagnostic tools of the Concerns Based Adoption Model, the Stages of Concern Questionnaire (SoCQ). The SoCQ was developed with a focus on K12 education. It has been used widely since developed in 1973, in early childhood, higher education, medical, business, community, and military settings. The SoCQ captures data about beliefs and intentions of individuals regarding their engagement with a new program or practice. In our search of publications utilizing the SoCQ, we have found studies conducted across the world, with approximately 400 based in the United States 100 conducted outside the US. In the datasets for this paper, we identified applications of the SoCQ to inform leadership of implementing innovations in nearly 1,000 sites between 2008 and 2023. This includes SoCQ administration in 42 US states, and approximately 150 uses outside the US. The SoCQ has been officially translated into nine languages in addition to English. Few instruments have remained relevant as long as the SoCQ, and fewer still have an accessible record of publications and data to study for renewal. We report here an extensive review of use, validity, reliability, and practical advice for future use of the SoCQ. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2025 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1472553 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 CustomLinks: – Url: https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1472553 Name: ERIC Full Text Category: fullText Text: Full Text from ERIC |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1472553 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: A Historic Review and Empirical Revitalization of the Stages of Concern Questionnaire – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kent+Anderson+Seidel%22">Kent Anderson Seidel</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22School+Leadership+Review%22"><i>School Leadership Review</i></searchLink>. 2025 20(1). – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Texas Council of Professors of Educational Administration. Web site: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/slr/ – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 32 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Questionnaires%22">Questionnaires</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Change%22">Educational Change</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Educational+Innovation%22">Educational Innovation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Intervention%22">Intervention</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Program+Implementation%22">Program Implementation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Models%22">Models</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Decision+Making%22">Decision Making</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Reliability%22">Test Reliability</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Validity%22">Test Validity</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Items%22">Test Items</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Item+Analysis%22">Item Analysis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Test+Interpretation%22">Test Interpretation</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Scores%22">Scores</searchLink> – Name: SubjectThesaurus Label: Assessment and Survey Identifiers Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SU" term="%22Stages+of+Concern+Questionnaire%22">Stages of Concern Questionnaire</searchLink> – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 1559-4998 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: This paper examines one of three central diagnostic tools of the Concerns Based Adoption Model, the Stages of Concern Questionnaire (SoCQ). The SoCQ was developed with a focus on K12 education. It has been used widely since developed in 1973, in early childhood, higher education, medical, business, community, and military settings. The SoCQ captures data about beliefs and intentions of individuals regarding their engagement with a new program or practice. In our search of publications utilizing the SoCQ, we have found studies conducted across the world, with approximately 400 based in the United States 100 conducted outside the US. In the datasets for this paper, we identified applications of the SoCQ to inform leadership of implementing innovations in nearly 1,000 sites between 2008 and 2023. This includes SoCQ administration in 42 US states, and approximately 150 uses outside the US. The SoCQ has been officially translated into nine languages in addition to English. Few instruments have remained relevant as long as the SoCQ, and fewer still have an accessible record of publications and data to study for renewal. We report here an extensive review of use, validity, reliability, and practical advice for future use of the SoCQ. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1472553 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1472553 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 32 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Questionnaires Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Change Type: general – SubjectFull: Educational Innovation Type: general – SubjectFull: Intervention Type: general – SubjectFull: Program Implementation Type: general – SubjectFull: Models Type: general – SubjectFull: Decision Making Type: general – SubjectFull: Test Reliability Type: general – SubjectFull: Test Validity Type: general – SubjectFull: Test Items Type: general – SubjectFull: Item Analysis Type: general – SubjectFull: Test Interpretation Type: general – SubjectFull: Scores Type: general – SubjectFull: Stages of Concern Questionnaire Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: A Historic Review and Empirical Revitalization of the Stages of Concern Questionnaire Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Kent Anderson Seidel IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 01 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 1559-4998 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 20 – Type: issue Value: 1 Titles: – TitleFull: School Leadership Review Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |
