View in EDS

Enhancing STEM Outcomes through Mentorship (Mis)matching: An Identity Grafting Approach

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Title: Enhancing STEM Outcomes through Mentorship (Mis)matching: An Identity Grafting Approach
Language: English
Authors: Daphnee Hui Lin Lee, Sze Wing Bertha Mak, Kam Kong Derek Lit, Kwan Choi Thomas Tse, Ching Sing Chai
Source: International Journal of STEM Education. 2025 12.
Availability: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
Peer Reviewed: Y
Page Count: 19
Publication Date: 2025
Document Type: Journal Articles
Reports - Research
Descriptors: STEM Education, Mentors, Self Concept, Teacher Student Relationship, Foreign Countries, Competition, Learning Experience, Transformative Learning, Problem Solving, Student Centered Learning
Geographic Terms: Hong Kong
DOI: 10.1186/s40594-025-00556-0
ISSN: 2196-7822
Abstract: Background: As mentorship programs variably impact STEM identity formation, significant attention is paid to whether mentors and mentees are well-matched. Mentorship-matching studies focus on the salient ethnic and gender influences on the identity formation of underrepresented minorities. We study socioeconomic-matching influences to ascertain whether less salient attributes have a similar impact on mentors and mentees. Beyond demographics, we consider the (mis)matching of uncertainty avoidance values as deep identity influences on STEM identity formation. Our approach is novel, applying identity grafting (IG; blended, integrated, repressed, and reversed) theory developed by the first author to examine the mentorship (mis)matching underpinnings of mentors' and mentees' STEM identity formation. Results: We adopted a case study approach to interpret mixed methods data collected from an interschool STEM competition in Hong Kong, correlating mentors' and mentees' survey scores to sample a team for observation. Unlike salient attributes such as ethnicity and gender, socioeconomic status did not yield the positive benefits reported in the literature. Although sharing similar demographics, even unobvious ones, gave the mentor and mentees an initial rapport, this rapport was not sustained. The mentor and mentees were unaware of each other's socioeconomic backgrounds, and they struggled with mismatched values and expectations in their mentorship. The mentor wanted the mentees to solve real problems rationally, like engineers, while mentees wanted an inspiring vision. Mutually repressing themselves and "reversing" the new information received from one another, they grafted STEM identities that embedded the perspective that being rational and being visionary are irreconcilable. Hence, the team was unable to "integrate" their differences or blend shared attributes. Conclusion: Identity-matched mentorship is more likely to generate empowering experiences, and mismatched mentorship is more likely to generate innovative experiences. Although matched mentorship can improve rapport between mentors and mentees, mismatched mentorship, even in deep identity domains, can facilitate transformative learning for both mentors and mentees, depending on how team members reconcile differences. A paradigm shift is needed in thinking about identity and learning about differences through an IG lens. Schools can prepare children early for diversity by supporting this shift in how mentees and future mentors can feel comfortable experiencing a range of emotions, including excitement, distress, ambivalence, or a blend of emotions, during learning.
Abstractor: As Provided
Entry Date: 2025
Accession Number: EJ1477389
Database: ERIC
FullText Text:
  Availability: 0
Header DbId: eric
DbLabel: ERIC
An: EJ1477389
AccessLevel: 3
PubType: Academic Journal
PubTypeId: academicJournal
PreciseRelevancyScore: 0
IllustrationInfo
Items – Name: Title
  Label: Title
  Group: Ti
  Data: Enhancing STEM Outcomes through Mentorship (Mis)matching: An Identity Grafting Approach
– Name: Language
  Label: Language
  Group: Lang
  Data: English
– Name: Author
  Label: Authors
  Group: Au
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Daphnee+Hui+Lin+Lee%22">Daphnee Hui Lin Lee</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Sze+Wing+Bertha+Mak%22">Sze Wing Bertha Mak</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kam+Kong+Derek+Lit%22">Kam Kong Derek Lit</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kwan+Choi+Thomas+Tse%22">Kwan Choi Thomas Tse</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ching+Sing+Chai%22">Ching Sing Chai</searchLink>
– Name: TitleSource
  Label: Source
  Group: Src
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22International+Journal+of+STEM+Education%22"><i>International Journal of STEM Education</i></searchLink>. 2025 12.
– Name: Avail
  Label: Availability
  Group: Avail
  Data: Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600, New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail: customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://link.springer.com/
– Name: PeerReviewed
  Label: Peer Reviewed
  Group: SrcInfo
  Data: Y
– Name: Pages
  Label: Page Count
  Group: Src
  Data: 19
– Name: DatePubCY
  Label: Publication Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2025
– Name: TypeDocument
  Label: Document Type
  Group: TypDoc
  Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research
– Name: Subject
  Label: Descriptors
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22STEM+Education%22">STEM Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Mentors%22">Mentors</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Self+Concept%22">Self Concept</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teacher+Student+Relationship%22">Teacher Student Relationship</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Foreign+Countries%22">Foreign Countries</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Competition%22">Competition</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Learning+Experience%22">Learning Experience</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Transformative+Learning%22">Transformative Learning</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Problem+Solving%22">Problem Solving</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Centered+Learning%22">Student Centered Learning</searchLink>
– Name: Subject
  Label: Geographic Terms
  Group: Su
  Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Hong+Kong%22">Hong Kong</searchLink>
– Name: DOI
  Label: DOI
  Group: ID
  Data: 10.1186/s40594-025-00556-0
– Name: ISSN
  Label: ISSN
  Group: ISSN
  Data: 2196-7822
– Name: Abstract
  Label: Abstract
  Group: Ab
  Data: Background: As mentorship programs variably impact STEM identity formation, significant attention is paid to whether mentors and mentees are well-matched. Mentorship-matching studies focus on the salient ethnic and gender influences on the identity formation of underrepresented minorities. We study socioeconomic-matching influences to ascertain whether less salient attributes have a similar impact on mentors and mentees. Beyond demographics, we consider the (mis)matching of uncertainty avoidance values as deep identity influences on STEM identity formation. Our approach is novel, applying identity grafting (IG; blended, integrated, repressed, and reversed) theory developed by the first author to examine the mentorship (mis)matching underpinnings of mentors' and mentees' STEM identity formation. Results: We adopted a case study approach to interpret mixed methods data collected from an interschool STEM competition in Hong Kong, correlating mentors' and mentees' survey scores to sample a team for observation. Unlike salient attributes such as ethnicity and gender, socioeconomic status did not yield the positive benefits reported in the literature. Although sharing similar demographics, even unobvious ones, gave the mentor and mentees an initial rapport, this rapport was not sustained. The mentor and mentees were unaware of each other's socioeconomic backgrounds, and they struggled with mismatched values and expectations in their mentorship. The mentor wanted the mentees to solve real problems rationally, like engineers, while mentees wanted an inspiring vision. Mutually repressing themselves and "reversing" the new information received from one another, they grafted STEM identities that embedded the perspective that being rational and being visionary are irreconcilable. Hence, the team was unable to "integrate" their differences or blend shared attributes. Conclusion: Identity-matched mentorship is more likely to generate empowering experiences, and mismatched mentorship is more likely to generate innovative experiences. Although matched mentorship can improve rapport between mentors and mentees, mismatched mentorship, even in deep identity domains, can facilitate transformative learning for both mentors and mentees, depending on how team members reconcile differences. A paradigm shift is needed in thinking about identity and learning about differences through an IG lens. Schools can prepare children early for diversity by supporting this shift in how mentees and future mentors can feel comfortable experiencing a range of emotions, including excitement, distress, ambivalence, or a blend of emotions, during learning.
– Name: AbstractInfo
  Label: Abstractor
  Group: Ab
  Data: As Provided
– Name: DateEntry
  Label: Entry Date
  Group: Date
  Data: 2025
– Name: AN
  Label: Accession Number
  Group: ID
  Data: EJ1477389
PLink https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1477389
RecordInfo BibRecord:
  BibEntity:
    Identifiers:
      – Type: doi
        Value: 10.1186/s40594-025-00556-0
    Languages:
      – Text: English
    PhysicalDescription:
      Pagination:
        PageCount: 19
    Subjects:
      – SubjectFull: STEM Education
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Mentors
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Self Concept
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Teacher Student Relationship
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Foreign Countries
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Competition
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Learning Experience
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Transformative Learning
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Problem Solving
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Student Centered Learning
        Type: general
      – SubjectFull: Hong Kong
        Type: general
    Titles:
      – TitleFull: Enhancing STEM Outcomes through Mentorship (Mis)matching: An Identity Grafting Approach
        Type: main
  BibRelationships:
    HasContributorRelationships:
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Daphnee Hui Lin Lee
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Sze Wing Bertha Mak
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Kam Kong Derek Lit
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Kwan Choi Thomas Tse
      – PersonEntity:
          Name:
            NameFull: Ching Sing Chai
    IsPartOfRelationships:
      – BibEntity:
          Dates:
            – D: 01
              M: 12
              Type: published
              Y: 2025
          Identifiers:
            – Type: issn-electronic
              Value: 2196-7822
          Numbering:
            – Type: volume
              Value: 12
          Titles:
            – TitleFull: International Journal of STEM Education
              Type: main
ResultId 1