Learning Tools Using ChatGPT in the Biochemistry Class: Creating Notes and Performance on Exams
Saved in:
| Title: | Learning Tools Using ChatGPT in the Biochemistry Class: Creating Notes and Performance on Exams |
|---|---|
| Language: | English |
| Authors: | Ana Roman (ORCID |
| Source: | Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education. 2025 53(4):381-388. |
| Availability: | Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us |
| Peer Reviewed: | Y |
| Page Count: | 8 |
| Publication Date: | 2025 |
| Document Type: | Journal Articles Reports - Research |
| Education Level: | Higher Education Postsecondary Education |
| Descriptors: | Artificial Intelligence, Biochemistry, Science Instruction, Technology Uses in Education, Introductory Courses, Student Attitudes, Instructional Materials, Teaching Methods, Notetaking, Undergraduate Students, Science Tests |
| Geographic Terms: | Ohio |
| DOI: | 10.1002/bmb.21904 |
| ISSN: | 1470-8175 1539-3429 |
| Abstract: | ChatGPT has emerged as a popular choice in education that has transformed the experience for both teachers and students. This study investigates the performance of ChatGPT in aiding learning in the biochemistry classroom in two ways. We sought to determine how effective ChatGPT 3.5 was in generating study materials for an introductory biochemistry course. A lecture was delivered in class and transcribed. The resulting transcript was curated, then submitted to ChatGPT 3.5 to generate a summary, a set of notes, and an outline. Each artifact was verified and given to students to help prepare for a quiz. Students were asked about the use of AI-generated materials compared to other study materials. Results were bimodal for the AI-generated materials, with some students indicating that the materials were useful while others preferred traditional study materials such as the text or class notes. We also compared the performance of ChatGPT on open-note biochemistry exams that students had taken. The exams were completed by ChatGPT in two modes: with and without access to external tools. Performance metrics were used to evaluate ChatGPT performance and student responses. The results showed that ChatGPT was unable to pass the exams. This research provides valuable insights into the potential of ChatGPT in educational settings, highlighting strengths and limitations. The implications of these findings may inform the design of future AI-assisted tools and contribute to the ongoing discussions surrounding the integration of AI in education. |
| Abstractor: | As Provided |
| Entry Date: | 2025 |
| Accession Number: | EJ1478119 |
| Database: | ERIC |
| FullText | Text: Availability: 0 |
|---|---|
| Header | DbId: eric DbLabel: ERIC An: EJ1478119 AccessLevel: 3 PubType: Academic Journal PubTypeId: academicJournal PreciseRelevancyScore: 0 |
| IllustrationInfo | |
| Items | – Name: Title Label: Title Group: Ti Data: Learning Tools Using ChatGPT in the Biochemistry Class: Creating Notes and Performance on Exams – Name: Language Label: Language Group: Lang Data: English – Name: Author Label: Authors Group: Au Data: <searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Ana+Roman%22">Ana Roman</searchLink> (ORCID <externalLink term="https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2959-3916">0009-0005-2959-3916</externalLink>)<br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Maria+Simaitis%22">Maria Simaitis</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Kate+Sheely%22">Kate Sheely</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22Yotam+M%2E+Roth%22">Yotam M. Roth</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22John+T%2E+Tansey%22">John T. Tansey</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="AR" term="%22John+Cogan%22">John Cogan</searchLink> – Name: TitleSource Label: Source Group: Src Data: <searchLink fieldCode="SO" term="%22Biochemistry+and+Molecular+Biology+Education%22"><i>Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education</i></searchLink>. 2025 53(4):381-388. – Name: Avail Label: Availability Group: Avail Data: Wiley. Available from: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030. Tel: 800-835-6770; e-mail: cs-journals@wiley.com; Web site: https://www.wiley.com/en-us – Name: PeerReviewed Label: Peer Reviewed Group: SrcInfo Data: Y – Name: Pages Label: Page Count Group: Src Data: 8 – Name: DatePubCY Label: Publication Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: TypeDocument Label: Document Type Group: TypDoc Data: Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research – Name: Audience Label: Education Level Group: Audnce Data: <searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Higher+Education%22">Higher Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="EL" term="%22Postsecondary+Education%22">Postsecondary Education</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Descriptors Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Artificial+Intelligence%22">Artificial Intelligence</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Biochemistry%22">Biochemistry</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Science+Instruction%22">Science Instruction</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Technology+Uses+in+Education%22">Technology Uses in Education</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Introductory+Courses%22">Introductory Courses</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Student+Attitudes%22">Student Attitudes</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Instructional+Materials%22">Instructional Materials</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Teaching+Methods%22">Teaching Methods</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Notetaking%22">Notetaking</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Undergraduate+Students%22">Undergraduate Students</searchLink><br /><searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Science+Tests%22">Science Tests</searchLink> – Name: Subject Label: Geographic Terms Group: Su Data: <searchLink fieldCode="DE" term="%22Ohio%22">Ohio</searchLink> – Name: DOI Label: DOI Group: ID Data: 10.1002/bmb.21904 – Name: ISSN Label: ISSN Group: ISSN Data: 1470-8175<br />1539-3429 – Name: Abstract Label: Abstract Group: Ab Data: ChatGPT has emerged as a popular choice in education that has transformed the experience for both teachers and students. This study investigates the performance of ChatGPT in aiding learning in the biochemistry classroom in two ways. We sought to determine how effective ChatGPT 3.5 was in generating study materials for an introductory biochemistry course. A lecture was delivered in class and transcribed. The resulting transcript was curated, then submitted to ChatGPT 3.5 to generate a summary, a set of notes, and an outline. Each artifact was verified and given to students to help prepare for a quiz. Students were asked about the use of AI-generated materials compared to other study materials. Results were bimodal for the AI-generated materials, with some students indicating that the materials were useful while others preferred traditional study materials such as the text or class notes. We also compared the performance of ChatGPT on open-note biochemistry exams that students had taken. The exams were completed by ChatGPT in two modes: with and without access to external tools. Performance metrics were used to evaluate ChatGPT performance and student responses. The results showed that ChatGPT was unable to pass the exams. This research provides valuable insights into the potential of ChatGPT in educational settings, highlighting strengths and limitations. The implications of these findings may inform the design of future AI-assisted tools and contribute to the ongoing discussions surrounding the integration of AI in education. – Name: AbstractInfo Label: Abstractor Group: Ab Data: As Provided – Name: DateEntry Label: Entry Date Group: Date Data: 2025 – Name: AN Label: Accession Number Group: ID Data: EJ1478119 |
| PLink | https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&db=eric&AN=EJ1478119 |
| RecordInfo | BibRecord: BibEntity: Identifiers: – Type: doi Value: 10.1002/bmb.21904 Languages: – Text: English PhysicalDescription: Pagination: PageCount: 8 StartPage: 381 Subjects: – SubjectFull: Artificial Intelligence Type: general – SubjectFull: Biochemistry Type: general – SubjectFull: Science Instruction Type: general – SubjectFull: Technology Uses in Education Type: general – SubjectFull: Introductory Courses Type: general – SubjectFull: Student Attitudes Type: general – SubjectFull: Instructional Materials Type: general – SubjectFull: Teaching Methods Type: general – SubjectFull: Notetaking Type: general – SubjectFull: Undergraduate Students Type: general – SubjectFull: Science Tests Type: general – SubjectFull: Ohio Type: general Titles: – TitleFull: Learning Tools Using ChatGPT in the Biochemistry Class: Creating Notes and Performance on Exams Type: main BibRelationships: HasContributorRelationships: – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Ana Roman – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Maria Simaitis – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Kate Sheely – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: Yotam M. Roth – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: John T. Tansey – PersonEntity: Name: NameFull: John Cogan IsPartOfRelationships: – BibEntity: Dates: – D: 01 M: 07 Type: published Y: 2025 Identifiers: – Type: issn-print Value: 1470-8175 – Type: issn-electronic Value: 1539-3429 Numbering: – Type: volume Value: 53 – Type: issue Value: 4 Titles: – TitleFull: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education Type: main |
| ResultId | 1 |